2.3 sec in total
659 ms
1.2 sec
408 ms
Welcome to thebigchoice.com homepage info - get ready to check Thebigchoice best content for United Kingdom right away, or after learning these important things about thebigchoice.com
We help graduates and school leavers land amazing opportunities at top firms! Create an account today and connect with the very latest student and graduate opportunities.
Visit thebigchoice.comWe analyzed Thebigchoice.com page load time and found that the first response time was 659 ms and then it took 1.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 35% of websites can load faster.
thebigchoice.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.3 s
18/100
10%
Value4.3 s
40/100
25%
Value4.3 s
76/100
10%
Value140 ms
96/100
30%
Value0.126
83/100
15%
Value6.4 s
60/100
10%
659 ms
55 ms
87 ms
34 ms
160 ms
Our browser made a total of 27 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 0% of them (0 request) were addressed to the original Thebigchoice.com, 11% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 7% (2 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (659 ms) relates to the external source Beetroot.com.
Page size can be reduced by 81.7 kB (19%)
423.5 kB
341.8 kB
In fact, the total size of Thebigchoice.com main page is 423.5 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 25% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 298.4 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 39.2 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 39.2 kB or 63% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 42.4 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Thebigchoice needs image optimization as it can save up to 42.4 kB or 14% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 62 B
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 14 B
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Thebigchoice.com has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 3 (13%)
23
20
The browser has sent 23 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Thebigchoice. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 4 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.beetroot.com
659 ms
gtm.js
55 ms
main.f76810f.min.css
87 ms
css
34 ms
main.f76810f.min.js
160 ms
beetroot-job-search-iphone.png
466 ms
beetroot-message-iphone.png
313 ms
featured-company-kpmg.png
294 ms
featured-company-ibm.png
293 ms
featured-company-pwc.png
292 ms
featured-company-dixons-carphone.png
292 ms
beetroot-startup-meeting.png
388 ms
rocket.svg
391 ms
pink-30x17.jpg
318 ms
facebook-grey.svg
318 ms
instagram-grey.svg
390 ms
linkedin-grey.svg
395 ms
twitter-grey.svg
396 ms
analytics.js
18 ms
beetroot_home_hero.png
460 ms
collect
16 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLGT9Z1xlEw.woff
25 ms
pxiEyp8kv8JHgFVrJJfedA.woff
30 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLEj6Z1xlEw.woff
33 ms
collect
31 ms
js
44 ms
ga-audiences
103 ms
thebigchoice.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
thebigchoice.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
thebigchoice.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Thebigchoice.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Thebigchoice.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
thebigchoice.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Thebigchoice. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: