Tools & Wizards About Us
thebritishjournal.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 17

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    32% of other websites

  • 65

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 30% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 91

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    70% of websites

thebritishjournal.com

The British Journal - Get the latest news stories and headlines from around the world.

Page Load Speed

6.6 sec in total

First Response

317 ms

Resources Loaded

5.8 sec

Page Rendered

486 ms

thebritishjournal.com screenshot

About Website

Visit thebritishjournal.com now to see the best up-to-date The British Journal content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about thebritishjournal.com

TheBritishJournal.com coverage of today's breaking news and headlines from the UK. Top stories,business, sport, culture, photos, videos and detailed news analysis and reporting from inside London...

Visit thebritishjournal.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Thebritishjournal.com page load time and found that the first response time was 317 ms and then it took 6.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

thebritishjournal.com performance score

17

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value6.4 s

2/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value6.9 s

6/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value18.8 s

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value57,860 ms

0/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.052

99/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value76.8 s

0/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

thebritishjournal.com

317 ms

www.thebritishjournal.com

457 ms

js

205 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

311 ms

style.min.css

318 ms

Our browser made a total of 60 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 33% of them (20 requests) were addressed to the original Thebritishjournal.com, 20% (12 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 13% (8 requests) were made to Youtube.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.2 sec) relates to the external source Youtube.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 386.3 kB (57%)

Content Size

672.8 kB

After Optimization

286.5 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Thebritishjournal.com main page is 672.8 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. CSS take 388.9 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-76%

Potential reduce by 39.8 kB

  • Original 52.5 kB
  • After minification 52.4 kB
  • After compression 12.7 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 39.8 kB or 76% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-34%

Potential reduce by 2.2 kB

  • Original 6.4 kB
  • After minification 4.2 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, The British Journal needs image optimization as it can save up to 2.2 kB or 34% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-14%

Potential reduce by 32.3 kB

  • Original 225.1 kB
  • After minification 225.1 kB
  • After compression 192.7 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 32.3 kB or 14% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-80%

Potential reduce by 312.0 kB

  • Original 388.9 kB
  • After minification 388.7 kB
  • After compression 76.8 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Thebritishjournal.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 312.0 kB or 80% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 28 (64%)

Requests Now

44

After Optimization

16

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 44 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of The British Journal. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 23 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 7 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

thebritishjournal.com

thebritishjournal.com

317 ms

www.thebritishjournal.com

www.thebritishjournal.com

457 ms

js

js

205 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

wp-emoji-release.min.js

311 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

318 ms

style.css

style.css

300 ms

reset.css

reset.css

298 ms

font-awesome.css

font-awesome.css

129 ms

media-queries.css

media-queries.css

332 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

467 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

535 ms

adsbygoogle.js

adsbygoogle.js

192 ms

jquery.elastislide.js

jquery.elastislide.js

1006 ms

scripts.js

scripts.js

1009 ms

respond.min.js

respond.min.js

529 ms

retina.js

retina.js

1003 ms

wp-embed.min.js

wp-embed.min.js

1010 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

27 ms

collect

collect

14 ms

collect

collect

31 ms

ga-audiences

ga-audiences

103 ms

css

css

515 ms

TheBritishJournallogo.png

TheBritishJournallogo.png

466 ms

show_ads_impl.js

show_ads_impl.js

394 ms

zrt_lookup.html

zrt_lookup.html

379 ms

social-buttons.png

social-buttons.png

702 ms

menu-fade.png

menu-fade.png

696 ms

white-noise.gif

white-noise.gif

696 ms

ticker-bg.png

ticker-bg.png

702 ms

dark-noise.gif

dark-noise.gif

701 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

152 ms

all.js

all.js

515 ms

TK3_WkUHHAIjg75cFRf3bXL8LICs1_FvgUE.ttf

TK3_WkUHHAIjg75cFRf3bXL8LICs1_FvgUE.ttf

684 ms

TK3_WkUHHAIjg75cFRf3bXL8LICs18NvgUE.ttf

TK3_WkUHHAIjg75cFRf3bXL8LICs18NvgUE.ttf

780 ms

TK3_WkUHHAIjg75cFRf3bXL8LICs169vgUE.ttf

TK3_WkUHHAIjg75cFRf3bXL8LICs169vgUE.ttf

781 ms

TK3_WkUHHAIjg75cFRf3bXL8LICs13FvgUE.ttf

TK3_WkUHHAIjg75cFRf3bXL8LICs13FvgUE.ttf

786 ms

TK3_WkUHHAIjg75cFRf3bXL8LICs1y9ogUE.ttf

TK3_WkUHHAIjg75cFRf3bXL8LICs1y9ogUE.ttf

785 ms

TK3_WkUHHAIjg75cFRf3bXL8LICs1xZogUE.ttf

TK3_WkUHHAIjg75cFRf3bXL8LICs1xZogUE.ttf

783 ms

z7NFdQDnbTkabZAIOl9il_O6KJj73e7Ff0GmPuI.ttf

z7NFdQDnbTkabZAIOl9il_O6KJj73e7Ff0GmPuI.ttf

785 ms

z7NFdQDnbTkabZAIOl9il_O6KJj73e7Ff1GhPuI.ttf

z7NFdQDnbTkabZAIOl9il_O6KJj73e7Ff1GhPuI.ttf

984 ms

4UacrEBBsBhlBjvfkQjt71kZfyBzPgNG9hUI_A.ttf

4UacrEBBsBhlBjvfkQjt71kZfyBzPgNG9hUI_A.ttf

1064 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0C4n.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0C4n.ttf

1064 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1y4n.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1y4n.ttf

1064 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1y4n.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1y4n.ttf

1092 ms

cookie.js

cookie.js

626 ms

integrator.js

integrator.js

589 ms

ads

ads

221 ms

all.js

all.js

198 ms

F7FxphSVRZk

F7FxphSVRZk

594 ms

-jQKFLPFG5Q

-jQKFLPFG5Q

1154 ms

gm54N3mSOxg

gm54N3mSOxg

1220 ms

www-player.css

www-player.css

69 ms

www-embed-player.js

www-embed-player.js

56 ms

base.js

base.js

185 ms

fetch-polyfill.js

fetch-polyfill.js

15 ms

ad_status.js

ad_status.js

365 ms

NAdTarfwBmmVN2jO9_ZDZXbW2JobdXK1pZJ09rC2Bcw.js

NAdTarfwBmmVN2jO9_ZDZXbW2JobdXK1pZJ09rC2Bcw.js

174 ms

embed.js

embed.js

99 ms

id

id

94 ms

VM1LbcxuQZ7urdjSm15-Kft2IdlldgxYJTjOL3p1Mjw.js

VM1LbcxuQZ7urdjSm15-Kft2IdlldgxYJTjOL3p1Mjw.js

174 ms

Accessibility Review

thebritishjournal.com accessibility score

65

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

High

Links do not have a discernible name

High

<object> elements do not have alternate text

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

thebritishjournal.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

thebritishjournal.com SEO score

91

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Thebritishjournal.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Thebritishjournal.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

thebritishjournal.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of The British Journal. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: