Report Summary

  • 42

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    61% of other websites

  • 76

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 42% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 73

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    31% of websites

thecarriedeer.com

Best Home Decorating Ideas | Home Decorating Guide!

Page Load Speed

2.1 sec in total

First Response

150 ms

Resources Loaded

1.8 sec

Page Rendered

159 ms

thecarriedeer.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Thecarriedeer content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about thecarriedeer.com

Get access to our Home Decorating Ideas information at any time of day or night. Hundreds of Home Decorating Ideas questions have been answered here.

Visit thecarriedeer.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Thecarriedeer.com page load time and found that the first response time was 150 ms and then it took 2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 40% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

thecarriedeer.com performance score

42

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.4 s

38/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value4.2 s

43/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value4.5 s

73/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,750 ms

10/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.039

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value11.1 s

20/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

www.thecarriedeer.com

150 ms

bf72666af36309e666f23b63193bfad0.css

19 ms

jquery.min-3.6.0.js

51 ms

css

66 ms

adsbygoogle.js

139 ms

Our browser made a total of 19 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 32% of them (6 requests) were addressed to the original Thecarriedeer.com, 16% (3 requests) were made to Pagead2.googlesyndication.com and 16% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (524 ms) belongs to the original domain Thecarriedeer.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 31.9 kB (7%)

Content Size

438.3 kB

After Optimization

406.3 kB

In fact, the total size of Thecarriedeer.com main page is 438.3 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 20% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 355.7 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-75%

Potential reduce by 31.7 kB

  • Original 42.2 kB
  • After minification 42.0 kB
  • After compression 10.5 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 31.7 kB or 75% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 676 B
  • After minification 676 B

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Thecarriedeer images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 195 B

  • Original 355.7 kB
  • After minification 355.7 kB
  • After compression 355.5 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 84 B

  • Original 39.8 kB
  • After minification 39.8 kB
  • After compression 39.7 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Thecarriedeer.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 6 (43%)

Requests Now

14

After Optimization

8

The browser has sent 14 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Thecarriedeer. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 7 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

thecarriedeer.com accessibility score

76

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

thecarriedeer.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

thecarriedeer.com SEO score

73

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Thecarriedeer.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Thecarriedeer.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Thecarriedeer. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: