Tools & Wizards About Us
thedailyreview.net screenshot

Report Summary

  • 66

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    79% of other websites

  • 76

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 42% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 75

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    32% of websites

thedailyreview.net

thedailyreview.net

Page Load Speed

1.6 sec in total

First Response

163 ms

Resources Loaded

781 ms

Page Rendered

682 ms

thedailyreview.net screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Thedailyreview content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about thedailyreview.net

Visit thedailyreview.net

Key Findings

We analyzed Thedailyreview.net page load time and found that the first response time was 163 ms and then it took 1.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 30% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

thedailyreview.net performance score

66

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.9 s

26/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value6.1 s

12/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value4.2 s

78/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value100 ms

98/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value4.7 s

80/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

thedailyreview.net

163 ms

css

53 ms

css

59 ms

bootstrap.min.css

62 ms

icofont.min.css

112 ms

Our browser made a total of 69 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 65% of them (45 requests) were addressed to the original Thedailyreview.net, 16% (11 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 6% (4 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (377 ms) belongs to the original domain Thedailyreview.net.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 59.5 kB (3%)

Content Size

1.8 MB

After Optimization

1.7 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Thedailyreview.net main page is 1.8 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.6 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-79%

Potential reduce by 28.4 kB

  • Original 35.9 kB
  • After minification 33.4 kB
  • After compression 7.4 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 28.4 kB or 79% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 29.0 kB

  • Original 1.6 MB
  • After minification 1.5 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Thedailyreview images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 581 B

  • Original 123.2 kB
  • After minification 123.2 kB
  • After compression 122.6 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 1.5 kB

  • Original 81.6 kB
  • After minification 81.6 kB
  • After compression 80.1 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Thedailyreview.net has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 29 (53%)

Requests Now

55

After Optimization

26

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 55 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Thedailyreview. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 16 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 15 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

thedailyreview.net

thedailyreview.net

163 ms

css

css

53 ms

css

css

59 ms

bootstrap.min.css

bootstrap.min.css

62 ms

icofont.min.css

icofont.min.css

112 ms

boxicons.min.css

boxicons.min.css

108 ms

venobox.css

venobox.css

106 ms

line-awesome.min.css

line-awesome.min.css

116 ms

owl.carousel.min.css

owl.carousel.min.css

108 ms

aos.css

aos.css

119 ms

style.css

style.css

160 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

170 ms

clipboard.min.js

clipboard.min.js

55 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

67 ms

css

css

54 ms

bootstrap.min.css

bootstrap.min.css

66 ms

icon

icon

57 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

67 ms

jquery-3.5.1.min.js

jquery-3.5.1.min.js

45 ms

popper.min.js

popper.min.js

43 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

73 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

166 ms

bootstrap.bundle.min.js

bootstrap.bundle.min.js

166 ms

jquery.easing.min.js

jquery.easing.min.js

165 ms

validate.js

validate.js

166 ms

jquery.waypoints.min.js

jquery.waypoints.min.js

252 ms

counterup.min.js

counterup.min.js

253 ms

venobox.min.js

venobox.min.js

252 ms

owl.carousel.min.js

owl.carousel.min.js

253 ms

isotope.pkgd.min.js

isotope.pkgd.min.js

253 ms

aos.js

aos.js

254 ms

main.js

main.js

297 ms

thedaily-logo.png

thedaily-logo.png

236 ms

alex-new.png

alex-new.png

369 ms

s1.jpg

s1.jpg

71 ms

s2.jpg

s2.jpg

70 ms

s3.jpg

s3.jpg

69 ms

s4.jpg

s4.jpg

69 ms

a7.jpg

a7.jpg

130 ms

a88.jpg

a88.jpg

235 ms

a99.jpg

a99.jpg

168 ms

bb.jpg

bb.jpg

114 ms

t1.jpg

t1.jpg

112 ms

t2.jpg

t2.jpg

165 ms

t3.jpg

t3.jpg

169 ms

t4.jpg

t4.jpg

209 ms

t5.jpg

t5.jpg

235 ms

t6.jpg

t6.jpg

235 ms

t7.jpg

t7.jpg

236 ms

t8.jpg

t8.jpg

254 ms

a22.jpg

a22.jpg

270 ms

a44.jpg

a44.jpg

273 ms

a55.jpg

a55.jpg

275 ms

waa.jpg

waa.jpg

278 ms

a11.jpg

a11.jpg

360 ms

lub.jpg

lub.jpg

377 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

12 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

22 ms

ea8Aad44WunzF9a-dL6toA8r8kqSK3A.ttf

ea8Aad44WunzF9a-dL6toA8r8kqSK3A.ttf

101 ms

pxiEyp8kv8JHgFVrJJfedw.ttf

pxiEyp8kv8JHgFVrJJfedw.ttf

112 ms

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLGT9Z1xlEA.ttf

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLGT9Z1xlEA.ttf

128 ms

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLDz8Z1xlEA.ttf

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLDz8Z1xlEA.ttf

140 ms

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLEj6Z1xlEA.ttf

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLEj6Z1xlEA.ttf

140 ms

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLCz7Z1xlEA.ttf

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLCz7Z1xlEA.ttf

139 ms

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVvoorCIPrQ.ttf

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVvoorCIPrQ.ttf

140 ms

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVvaorCIPrQ.ttf

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVvaorCIPrQ.ttf

141 ms

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVuEorCIPrQ.ttf

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVuEorCIPrQ.ttf

140 ms

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVsEpbCIPrQ.ttf

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVsEpbCIPrQ.ttf

142 ms

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVs9pbCIPrQ.ttf

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVs9pbCIPrQ.ttf

142 ms

Accessibility Review

thedailyreview.net accessibility score

76

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

thedailyreview.net best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

thedailyreview.net SEO score

75

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Thedailyreview.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Thedailyreview.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

thedailyreview.net

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Thedailyreview. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: