1.5 sec in total
138 ms
1.1 sec
299 ms
Visit thedesignerseye.com now to see the best up-to-date The Designers Eye content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about thedesignerseye.com
Check out The Designer's Eye! We're serving Tucson with all of their design needs, from drafting through home staging!
Visit thedesignerseye.comWe analyzed Thedesignerseye.com page load time and found that the first response time was 138 ms and then it took 1.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 30% of websites can load faster.
thedesignerseye.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.0 s
51/100
10%
Value17.9 s
0/100
25%
Value7.8 s
23/100
10%
Value530 ms
55/100
30%
Value0.237
52/100
15%
Value14.2 s
9/100
10%
138 ms
306 ms
60 ms
50 ms
27 ms
Our browser made a total of 70 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 4% of them (3 requests) were addressed to the original Thedesignerseye.com, 60% (42 requests) were made to V692aa.p3cdn1.secureserver.net and 23% (16 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (482 ms) relates to the external source V692aa.p3cdn1.secureserver.net.
Page size can be reduced by 687.7 kB (20%)
3.4 MB
2.7 MB
In fact, the total size of Thedesignerseye.com main page is 3.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 2.6 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 308.8 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 308.8 kB or 88% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 374.1 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, The Designers Eye needs image optimization as it can save up to 374.1 kB or 14% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 2.8 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 2.1 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Thedesignerseye.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 2.1 kB or 11% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 21 (41%)
51
30
The browser has sent 51 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of The Designers Eye. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 19 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
thedesignerseye.com
138 ms
thedesignerseye.com
306 ms
styles.css
60 ms
wp_head.css
50 ms
sharethis.js
27 ms
et-divi-customizer-global.min.css
39 ms
hooks.min.js
49 ms
i18n.min.js
144 ms
index.js
39 ms
index.js
76 ms
jquery.min.js
76 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
76 ms
scripts.min.js
77 ms
wp_footer.js
77 ms
smoothscroll.js
78 ms
magnific-popup.js
143 ms
salvattore.js
128 ms
common.js
194 ms
wpcf7-recaptcha-controls.js
142 ms
api.js
38 ms
ga.js
31 ms
analytics.js
75 ms
swishtopbg.fw_.png
227 ms
Website-Header-Art-2_name-and-slogan-logo_the-designers-eye_shawn-barghout_2017.png
117 ms
liz-interior-2014.png
211 ms
Cindy-K-staging-consultation.png
216 ms
florence-staging-2016.png
215 ms
kennedy-remodel.png
215 ms
caesar-interior-1.png
191 ms
ladehoff-2012.png
300 ms
daun-interior.png
272 ms
maureen-interior.png
367 ms
deeter-interior-2015.png
292 ms
sprinkle-plans.png
302 ms
jennifer-condo-staging.png
366 ms
miller-organizer-professional.png
422 ms
caroline-t-interior.png
416 ms
Hayes-design.png
385 ms
caroline-interior.png
407 ms
tierney-interio.png
482 ms
drew-2012-construction.png
429 ms
goldsmith-2014.png
474 ms
Google-Reviews_Read-More_the-designers-eye_shawn-barghout-300x194.png
431 ms
subscribe-loader.gif
432 ms
PBR-Crop-3998.jpg
455 ms
TUZ3zwprpvBS1izr_vOMscG6eg.woff
114 ms
TUZ3zwprpvBS1izr_vOMscG6eQ.ttf
166 ms
TUZyzwprpvBS1izr_vO0Dg.woff
166 ms
TUZyzwprpvBS1izr_vO0DQ.ttf
168 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0C4k.woff
168 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0C4n.ttf
166 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0C4k.woff
168 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0C4n.ttf
167 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1y4k.woff
189 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1y4n.ttf
189 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1y4k.woff
188 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1y4n.ttf
187 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgshZ1y4k.woff
187 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgshZ1y4n.ttf
188 ms
__utm.gif
85 ms
modules.woff
445 ms
collect
139 ms
recaptcha__en.js
89 ms
IMG_3803.jpg
319 ms
aa-swish.png
319 ms
KtkxAKiDZI_td1Lkx62xHZHDtgO_Y-bvfY0.woff
70 ms
KtkxAKiDZI_td1Lkx62xHZHDtgO_Y-bvfY4.ttf
29 ms
404.html
62 ms
js
98 ms
style.min.css
24 ms
thedesignerseye.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
thedesignerseye.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
thedesignerseye.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Thedesignerseye.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Thedesignerseye.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
thedesignerseye.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of The Designers Eye. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: