4.8 sec in total
314 ms
3.9 sec
527 ms
Click here to check amazing Thefilter content for United Kingdom. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about thefilter.com
Our personalization platform harnesses AI & data science to drive content engagement. 24iQ is available as pre-integrated packages or with additional managed services.
Visit thefilter.comWe analyzed Thefilter.com page load time and found that the first response time was 314 ms and then it took 4.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.
thefilter.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.3 s
39/100
10%
Value8.5 s
2/100
25%
Value9.1 s
14/100
10%
Value410 ms
67/100
30%
Value0.105
88/100
15%
Value15.6 s
6/100
10%
314 ms
45 ms
81 ms
162 ms
164 ms
Our browser made a total of 74 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 70% of them (52 requests) were addressed to the original Thefilter.com, 7% (5 requests) were made to Platform.twitter.com and 3% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.4 sec) belongs to the original domain Thefilter.com.
Page size can be reduced by 1.6 MB (62%)
2.5 MB
953.6 kB
In fact, the total size of Thefilter.com main page is 2.5 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. CSS take 1.2 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 46.6 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 46.6 kB or 80% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 227.3 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Thefilter needs image optimization as it can save up to 227.3 kB or 25% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 217.7 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 217.7 kB or 63% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 1.1 MB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Thefilter.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 1.1 MB or 89% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 52 (78%)
67
15
The browser has sent 67 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Thefilter. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 20 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 21 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.thefilter.com
314 ms
css
45 ms
styles.css
81 ms
style.css
162 ms
widget-style.php
164 ms
form-style.php
166 ms
frontend.css
166 ms
grid.css
168 ms
base.css
180 ms
layout.css
316 ms
shortcodes.css
325 ms
magnific-popup.css
247 ms
mediaelementplayer.css
247 ms
enfold.css
341 ms
custom.css
250 ms
js_composer.min.css
548 ms
custom.css
351 ms
jquery.js
403 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
390 ms
public.js
392 ms
avia-compat.js
394 ms
jquery.form.min.js
380 ms
scripts.js
455 ms
avia.js
689 ms
shortcodes.js
689 ms
jquery.magnific-popup.min.js
460 ms
mediaelement-and-player.min.js
467 ms
wp-mediaelement.js
687 ms
comment-reply.min.js
688 ms
wp-embed.min.js
689 ms
js_composer_front.min.js
691 ms
conversion.js
34 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
661 ms
analytics.js
76 ms
White-Web-Logo2-300x91.gif
95 ms
Logo_clients_bar_Enlrg_1200pxW_v2.png
454 ms
Home_Inspire_devices_v2-grey.gif
168 ms
Homepage_icon_segmentation.png
96 ms
Homepage_icon_combinations.png
97 ms
Homepage_icon_personalisation.png
164 ms
Homepage_icon_business-rule.png
167 ms
Homepage_icon_dashboard.png
168 ms
Homepage_icon_integrations.png
168 ms
8635409874_3754c0aafd_k-300x200.jpg
393 ms
3235065459_-300x200.jpg
393 ms
SplitShire-8881-300x200.jpg
395 ms
Footer_Location_icon.png
392 ms
Footer_Email_icon.png
391 ms
Footer_social_Twitter.png
449 ms
Footer_social_Linkedin.png
449 ms
Footer_social_google.png
448 ms
Footer_social_Facebook.png
448 ms
homepage_header_image2.jpg
1368 ms
widgets.js
104 ms
collect
25 ms
cJZKeOuBrn4kERxqtaUH3bO3LdcAZYWl9Si6vvxL-qU.woff
66 ms
MTP_ySUJH_bn48VBG8sNSqRDOzjiPcYnFooOUGCOsRk.woff
66 ms
entypo-fontello.woff
522 ms
collect
282 ms
219 ms
timeline.d11f7a3b3287fb94220e8ee6d03cc772.js
162 ms
ga-audiences
79 ms
58 ms
syndication
103 ms
679669739019464705
139 ms
proxy.jpg
31 ms
timeline.47ab5d19e8ed22531abcf4f86f3ae53a.dark.ltr.css
48 ms
timeline.47ab5d19e8ed22531abcf4f86f3ae53a.dark.ltr.css
72 ms
dlVxBv1g_normal.png
77 ms
syndication_bundle_v1_64fcb3dd2f6da5b5f976d91a319ef73e329c1a5d.css
90 ms
syndication_bundle_v1_64fcb3dd2f6da5b5f976d91a319ef73e329c1a5d.css
87 ms
proxy.jpg
6 ms
jot.html
29 ms
print.css
82 ms
thefilter.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
thefilter.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
thefilter.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Thefilter.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Thefilter.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
thefilter.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Thefilter. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: