Tools & Wizards About Us
thefoodpig.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 56

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    72% of other websites

  • 85

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 58% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 92

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    74% of websites

thefoodpig.com

The Food Pig – A Rebels Guide to Food

Page Load Speed

1 sec in total

First Response

184 ms

Resources Loaded

652 ms

Page Rendered

177 ms

thefoodpig.com screenshot

About Website

Visit thefoodpig.com now to see the best up-to-date The Food Pig content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about thefoodpig.com

Cooking, Baking, Food Preparation

Visit thefoodpig.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Thefoodpig.com page load time and found that the first response time was 184 ms and then it took 829 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 15% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

thefoodpig.com performance score

56

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.2 s

78/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value2.9 s

81/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value3.6 s

86/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,560 ms

13/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value20.8 s

2/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

www.thefoodpig.com

184 ms

google-fonts.min.css

10 ms

google-plus-fonts.min.css

15 ms

ga_pub_692.js

168 ms

style.min.css

27 ms

Our browser made a total of 41 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 88% of them (36 requests) were addressed to the original Thefoodpig.com, 7% (3 requests) were made to Bcdn.grmtas.com and 2% (1 request) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (218 ms) relates to the external source Googletagmanager.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 86.6 kB (23%)

Content Size

379.0 kB

After Optimization

292.4 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Thefoodpig.com main page is 379.0 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 123.9 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-78%

Potential reduce by 66.9 kB

  • Original 85.9 kB
  • After minification 84.3 kB
  • After compression 19.1 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 66.9 kB or 78% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 330 B

  • Original 123.9 kB
  • After minification 123.6 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. The Food Pig images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-11%

Potential reduce by 12.5 kB

  • Original 109.1 kB
  • After minification 109.1 kB
  • After compression 96.6 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 12.5 kB or 11% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-11%

Potential reduce by 6.9 kB

  • Original 60.1 kB
  • After minification 60.1 kB
  • After compression 53.2 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Thefoodpig.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 6.9 kB or 11% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 23 (59%)

Requests Now

39

After Optimization

16

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 39 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of The Food Pig. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 15 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 10 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

www.thefoodpig.com

www.thefoodpig.com

184 ms

google-fonts.min.css

google-fonts.min.css

10 ms

google-plus-fonts.min.css

google-plus-fonts.min.css

15 ms

ga_pub_692.js

ga_pub_692.js

168 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

27 ms

style.css

style.css

21 ms

atw-posts-style.min.css

atw-posts-style.min.css

26 ms

fonts.min.css

fonts.min.css

35 ms

style-weaverx.min.css

style-weaverx.min.css

36 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

41 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

32 ms

weaverxjslib.min.js

weaverxjslib.min.js

33 ms

jquery.smartmenus.min.js

jquery.smartmenus.min.js

31 ms

tfp-style.css

tfp-style.css

32 ms

js

js

218 ms

mediaelementplayer-legacy.min.css

mediaelementplayer-legacy.min.css

33 ms

wp-mediaelement.min.css

wp-mediaelement.min.css

32 ms

comment-reply.min.js

comment-reply.min.js

38 ms

weaverxjslib-end.min.js

weaverxjslib-end.min.js

97 ms

printomat.js

printomat.js

96 ms

print_elements.js

print_elements.js

95 ms

ga-fixed-widget.js

ga-fixed-widget.js

95 ms

akismet-frontend.js

akismet-frontend.js

96 ms

mediaelement-and-player.min.js

mediaelement-and-player.min.js

94 ms

mediaelement-migrate.min.js

mediaelement-migrate.min.js

108 ms

wp-mediaelement.min.js

wp-mediaelement.min.js

109 ms

vimeo.min.js

vimeo.min.js

108 ms

gourmetads-logo.jpg

gourmetads-logo.jpg

61 ms

GADS_featured_publisher_250x140.gif

GADS_featured_publisher_250x140.gif

126 ms

cropped-Pic-220-1.jpg

cropped-Pic-220-1.jpg

26 ms

b6fad0fb-8bc9-40f1-a225-fea6dec5b8ed-150x150.webp

b6fad0fb-8bc9-40f1-a225-fea6dec5b8ed-150x150.webp

18 ms

IMG_20171203_090617769_HDR-150x150.jpg

IMG_20171203_090617769_HDR-150x150.jpg

19 ms

IMG_3996-150x150.jpg

IMG_3996-150x150.jpg

22 ms

5a0865209cdf9-150x150.jpeg

5a0865209cdf9-150x150.jpeg

23 ms

DanMeatballs2-150x150.jpg

DanMeatballs2-150x150.jpg

22 ms

Pic-2151-150x150.jpg

Pic-2151-150x150.jpg

23 ms

blueberrypie-150x150.jpg

blueberrypie-150x150.jpg

23 ms

Too-many-cooks-spoil-the-broth-300x243.jpg

Too-many-cooks-spoil-the-broth-300x243.jpg

24 ms

mejs-controls.svg

mejs-controls.svg

35 ms

Genericons.svg

Genericons.svg

31 ms

8AAnjaY2BgYGQAgjO2i86D6AshzNIwGgBAmQUAAAA=

8AAnjaY2BgYGQAgjO2i86D6AshzNIwGgBAmQUAAAA=

29 ms

Accessibility Review

thefoodpig.com accessibility score

85

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Best Practices

thefoodpig.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

thefoodpig.com SEO score

92

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Thefoodpig.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Thefoodpig.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

thefoodpig.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of The Food Pig. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: