Tools & Wizards About Us
thegoodbedcompany.co.uk screenshot

Report Summary

  • 28

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    47% of other websites

  • 93

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 80% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 99

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    93% of websites

thegoodbedcompany.co.uk

M&S, John Lewis or Debenhams Double, King or Super King Size Beds? - TheGoodBedCompany.co.uk

Page Load Speed

6 sec in total

First Response

289 ms

Resources Loaded

4 sec

Page Rendered

1.7 sec

thegoodbedcompany.co.uk screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing The Good Bed Company content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about thegoodbedcompany.co.uk

Discover Superb Quality & Affordable Single, Double, King or Super King Size Beds & Mattresses Online. Great Options to M&S, John Lewis or Debenhams Designer Beds, Frames & Mattresses...

Visit thegoodbedcompany.co.uk

Key Findings

We analyzed Thegoodbedcompany.co.uk page load time and found that the first response time was 289 ms and then it took 5.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 75% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

thegoodbedcompany.co.uk performance score

28

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value5.1 s

9/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value11.5 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value8.1 s

21/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value970 ms

28/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.065

97/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value11.2 s

20/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

thegoodbedcompany.co.uk

289 ms

www.thegoodbedcompany.co.uk

780 ms

bnrvh.css

190 ms

bnrvh.css

273 ms

bnrvh.css

452 ms

Our browser made a total of 98 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 95% of them (93 requests) were addressed to the original Thegoodbedcompany.co.uk, 2% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com and 2% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1 sec) belongs to the original domain Thegoodbedcompany.co.uk.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 315.8 kB (26%)

Content Size

1.2 MB

After Optimization

889.8 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Thegoodbedcompany.co.uk main page is 1.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 583.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-88%

Potential reduce by 312.9 kB

  • Original 357.3 kB
  • After minification 348.1 kB
  • After compression 44.4 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 312.9 kB or 88% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 156 B

  • Original 56.7 kB
  • After minification 56.5 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. The Good Bed Company images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 2.2 kB

  • Original 583.8 kB
  • After minification 583.6 kB
  • After compression 581.5 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 513 B

  • Original 207.8 kB
  • After minification 207.8 kB
  • After compression 207.3 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Thegoodbedcompany.co.uk has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 87 (92%)

Requests Now

95

After Optimization

8

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 95 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of The Good Bed Company. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 78 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 11 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

thegoodbedcompany.co.uk

thegoodbedcompany.co.uk

289 ms

www.thegoodbedcompany.co.uk

www.thegoodbedcompany.co.uk

780 ms

bnrvh.css

bnrvh.css

190 ms

bnrvh.css

bnrvh.css

273 ms

bnrvh.css

bnrvh.css

452 ms

bnrvh.css

bnrvh.css

279 ms

post-693.css

post-693.css

279 ms

bnrvh.css

bnrvh.css

280 ms

post-691.css

post-691.css

283 ms

css

css

39 ms

css

css

56 ms

bnrvh.js

bnrvh.js

470 ms

bnrvh.js

bnrvh.js

364 ms

bnrvh.js

bnrvh.js

369 ms

bnrvh.js

bnrvh.js

484 ms

js

js

71 ms

bnrvh.js

bnrvh.js

376 ms

bnrvh.js

bnrvh.js

549 ms

bnrvh.js

bnrvh.js

482 ms

bnrvh.css

bnrvh.css

600 ms

sourcebuster.min.js

sourcebuster.min.js

453 ms

order-attribution.min.js

order-attribution.min.js

473 ms

wp-polyfill-inert.min.js

wp-polyfill-inert.min.js

498 ms

regenerator-runtime.min.js

regenerator-runtime.min.js

511 ms

wp-polyfill.min.js

wp-polyfill.min.js

563 ms

react.min.js

react.min.js

564 ms

hooks.min.js

hooks.min.js

564 ms

deprecated.min.js

deprecated.min.js

565 ms

dom.min.js

dom.min.js

601 ms

react-dom.min.js

react-dom.min.js

681 ms

escape-html.min.js

escape-html.min.js

681 ms

element.min.js

element.min.js

680 ms

is-shallow-equal.min.js

is-shallow-equal.min.js

682 ms

i18n.min.js

i18n.min.js

715 ms

keycodes.min.js

keycodes.min.js

714 ms

priority-queue.min.js

priority-queue.min.js

731 ms

compose.min.js

compose.min.js

733 ms

private-apis.min.js

private-apis.min.js

734 ms

redux-routine.min.js

redux-routine.min.js

739 ms

data.min.js

data.min.js

776 ms

lodash.min.js

lodash.min.js

780 ms

wc-blocks-registry.js

wc-blocks-registry.js

728 ms

url.min.js

url.min.js

643 ms

api-fetch.min.js

api-fetch.min.js

642 ms

wc-settings.js

wc-settings.js

646 ms

data-controls.min.js

data-controls.min.js

684 ms

html-entities.min.js

html-entities.min.js

687 ms

notices.min.js

notices.min.js

643 ms

wc-blocks-middleware.js

wc-blocks-middleware.js

641 ms

wc-blocks-data.js

wc-blocks-data.js

637 ms

dom-ready.min.js

dom-ready.min.js

549 ms

a11y.min.js

a11y.min.js

574 ms

primitives.min.js

primitives.min.js

579 ms

warning.min.js

warning.min.js

586 ms

blocks-components.js

blocks-components.js

561 ms

blocks-checkout.js

blocks-checkout.js

545 ms

order-attribution-blocks.min.js

order-attribution-blocks.min.js

523 ms

general.min.js

general.min.js

561 ms

font

font

35 ms

font

font

36 ms

eael-691.js

eael-691.js

558 ms

smush-lazy-load.min.js

smush-lazy-load.min.js

533 ms

underscore.min.js

underscore.min.js

541 ms

shortcode.min.js

shortcode.min.js

543 ms

backbone.min.js

backbone.min.js

535 ms

wp-util.min.js

wp-util.min.js

549 ms

wp-backbone.min.js

wp-backbone.min.js

484 ms

media-models.min.js

media-models.min.js

506 ms

wp-plupload.min.js

wp-plupload.min.js

514 ms

core.min.js

core.min.js

517 ms

mouse.min.js

mouse.min.js

490 ms

sortable.min.js

sortable.min.js

527 ms

mediaelement-and-player.min.js

mediaelement-and-player.min.js

547 ms

mediaelement-migrate.min.js

mediaelement-migrate.min.js

545 ms

wp-mediaelement.min.js

wp-mediaelement.min.js

551 ms

api-request.min.js

api-request.min.js

555 ms

clipboard.min.js

clipboard.min.js

557 ms

media-views.min.js

media-views.min.js

560 ms

media-editor.min.js

media-editor.min.js

566 ms

media-audiovideo.min.js

media-audiovideo.min.js

546 ms

v4-shims.min.js

v4-shims.min.js

551 ms

selectWoo.full.min.js

selectWoo.full.min.js

557 ms

webpack.runtime.min.js

webpack.runtime.min.js

557 ms

frontend-modules.min.js

frontend-modules.min.js

562 ms

waypoints.min.js

waypoints.min.js

576 ms

frontend.min.js

frontend.min.js

546 ms

jquery.zoom.min.js

jquery.zoom.min.js

553 ms

jquery.flexslider.min.js

jquery.flexslider.min.js

557 ms

photoswipe.min.js

photoswipe.min.js

559 ms

photoswipe-ui-default.min.js

photoswipe-ui-default.min.js

563 ms

add-to-cart-variation.min.js

add-to-cart-variation.min.js

577 ms

single-product.min.js

single-product.min.js

548 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

638 ms

admin-ajax.php

admin-ajax.php

1040 ms

Solid-Wood-White-Bed-Frame-Single-to-Super-King-Sizes-300x240.webp

Solid-Wood-White-Bed-Frame-Single-to-Super-King-Sizes-300x240.webp

544 ms

mattress-online-300.jpg

mattress-online-300.jpg

612 ms

Caine-Fabric-Ottoman-Bed-300x225.webp

Caine-Fabric-Ottoman-Bed-300x225.webp

279 ms

bnrvh.css

bnrvh.css

97 ms

Accessibility Review

thegoodbedcompany.co.uk accessibility score

93

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

ARIA input fields do not have accessible names

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

thegoodbedcompany.co.uk best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

thegoodbedcompany.co.uk SEO score

99

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Thegoodbedcompany.co.uk can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Thegoodbedcompany.co.uk main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

thegoodbedcompany.co.uk

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of The Good Bed Company. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: