Tools & Wizards About Us
thegrahamgeorgetown.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 74

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    83% of other websites

  • 95

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 86% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 92

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    74% of websites

thegrahamgeorgetown.com

The Graham - Luxury Boutique Hotel in Georgetown D.C.

Page Load Speed

1.3 sec in total

First Response

32 ms

Resources Loaded

548 ms

Page Rendered

687 ms

thegrahamgeorgetown.com screenshot

About Website

Visit thegrahamgeorgetown.com now to see the best up-to-date The Graham Georgetown content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about thegrahamgeorgetown.com

Welcome to The Graham Hotel, where cultured sophistication meets modern luxury in one of the most refined boutique hotels in Georgetown D.C.

Visit thegrahamgeorgetown.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Thegrahamgeorgetown.com page load time and found that the first response time was 32 ms and then it took 1.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 25% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

thegrahamgeorgetown.com performance score

74

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.2 s

79/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value5.7 s

16/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value2.2 s

99/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value30 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.007

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value5.8 s

67/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

thegrahamgeorgetown.com

32 ms

thegrahamgeorgetown.com

36 ms

dynamik-min.css

11 ms

style.min.css

20 ms

main.css

38 ms

Our browser made a total of 50 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 80% of them (40 requests) were addressed to the original Thegrahamgeorgetown.com, 12% (6 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 2% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (375 ms) relates to the external source Google.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 183.6 kB (12%)

Content Size

1.5 MB

After Optimization

1.3 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Thegrahamgeorgetown.com main page is 1.5 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.2 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 104.8 kB

  • Original 125.8 kB
  • After minification 121.9 kB
  • After compression 21.0 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 104.8 kB or 83% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 2.1 kB

  • Original 1.2 MB
  • After minification 1.2 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. The Graham Georgetown images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-67%

Potential reduce by 11.1 kB

  • Original 16.7 kB
  • After minification 16.5 kB
  • After compression 5.6 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 11.1 kB or 67% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-55%

Potential reduce by 65.6 kB

  • Original 119.1 kB
  • After minification 116.4 kB
  • After compression 53.6 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Thegrahamgeorgetown.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 65.6 kB or 55% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 12 (29%)

Requests Now

41

After Optimization

29

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 41 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of The Graham Georgetown. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 13 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

thegrahamgeorgetown.com

thegrahamgeorgetown.com

32 ms

thegrahamgeorgetown.com

thegrahamgeorgetown.com

36 ms

dynamik-min.css

dynamik-min.css

11 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

20 ms

main.css

main.css

38 ms

fancybox.css

fancybox.css

32 ms

style.css

style.css

33 ms

widget-options.css

widget-options.css

31 ms

wpfront-notification-bar.min.css

wpfront-notification-bar.min.css

38 ms

style.css

style.css

31 ms

owl.carousel.min.css

owl.carousel.min.css

42 ms

owl.theme.default.min.css

owl.theme.default.min.css

39 ms

font-awesome.css

font-awesome.css

40 ms

aos.css

aos.css

39 ms

css

css

76 ms

lazyload.min.js

lazyload.min.js

46 ms

symbol-defs.svg

symbol-defs.svg

45 ms

arrow_down.png

arrow_down.png

15 ms

logo.png

logo.png

14 ms

watermark.jpg

watermark.jpg

15 ms

pattern.jpg

pattern.jpg

20 ms

darkbg.jpg

darkbg.jpg

15 ms

Tripadvisor_lockup_horizontal_secondary_registered.svg

Tripadvisor_lockup_horizontal_secondary_registered.svg

35 ms

Graham-Georgetown.jpeg

Graham-Georgetown.jpeg

22 ms

Graham-Hotel-Lobby-1024x814.jpg

Graham-Hotel-Lobby-1024x814.jpg

14 ms

buzzfeed-300x150.png

buzzfeed-300x150.png

54 ms

usa-today-300x150.png

usa-today-300x150.png

135 ms

cn-traveler-300x150.png

cn-traveler-300x150.png

14 ms

businesswire-300x150.png

businesswire-300x150.png

19 ms

thrillist-300x150.png

thrillist-300x150.png

20 ms

forbes-300x150.png

forbes-300x150.png

20 ms

eater-300x150.png

eater-300x150.png

70 ms

graham-georgetown-hotel-dining_42-1.jpg

graham-georgetown-hotel-dining_42-1.jpg

35 ms

800x530_Shopping-1.jpg

800x530_Shopping-1.jpg

35 ms

graham-georgetown-hotel-muse_11.jpg

graham-georgetown-hotel-muse_11.jpg

35 ms

graham-georgetown-hotel-sights_5-1.jpg

graham-georgetown-hotel-sights_5-1.jpg

37 ms

graham06-550x510-2.jpg

graham06-550x510-2.jpg

79 ms

graham11-1.jpg

graham11-1.jpg

36 ms

DSC_4160-1-1-1024x684.jpg

DSC_4160-1-1-1024x684.jpg

39 ms

DSC_4153-1-1-1024x684.jpg

DSC_4153-1-1-1024x684.jpg

39 ms

graham07-luxury-kind-suite-1.jpg

graham07-luxury-kind-suite-1.jpg

42 ms

embed

embed

375 ms

rP2tp2ywxg089UriI5-g4vlH9VoD8CmcqZG40F9JadbnoEwAopxRSW3z.ttf

rP2tp2ywxg089UriI5-g4vlH9VoD8CmcqZG40F9JadbnoEwAopxRSW3z.ttf

22 ms

rP2tp2ywxg089UriI5-g4vlH9VoD8CmcqZG40F9JadbnoEwAkJxRSW3z.ttf

rP2tp2ywxg089UriI5-g4vlH9VoD8CmcqZG40F9JadbnoEwAkJxRSW3z.ttf

29 ms

rP2tp2ywxg089UriI5-g4vlH9VoD8CmcqZG40F9JadbnoEwARZtRSW3z.ttf

rP2tp2ywxg089UriI5-g4vlH9VoD8CmcqZG40F9JadbnoEwARZtRSW3z.ttf

42 ms

TK3_WkUHHAIjg75cFRf3bXL8LICs1_FvsUZiYA.ttf

TK3_WkUHHAIjg75cFRf3bXL8LICs1_FvsUZiYA.ttf

61 ms

t5tmIRoYMoaYG0WEOh7HwMeR3T7Pqg.ttf

t5tmIRoYMoaYG0WEOh7HwMeR3T7Pqg.ttf

48 ms

rP2rp2ywxg089UriCZaSExd86J3t9jz86Mvy4qCRAL19DksVat-JDV30TGI.ttf

rP2rp2ywxg089UriCZaSExd86J3t9jz86Mvy4qCRAL19DksVat-JDV30TGI.ttf

61 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

9 ms

js

js

35 ms

Accessibility Review

thegrahamgeorgetown.com accessibility score

95

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

Best Practices

thegrahamgeorgetown.com best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

thegrahamgeorgetown.com SEO score

92

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Thegrahamgeorgetown.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Thegrahamgeorgetown.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

thegrahamgeorgetown.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of The Graham Georgetown. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: