6.6 sec in total
1.9 sec
4.5 sec
229 ms
Visit thejmg.com now to see the best up-to-date Thejmg content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about thejmg.com
Visit thejmg.comWe analyzed Thejmg.com page load time and found that the first response time was 1.9 sec and then it took 4.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.
thejmg.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.6 s
65/100
10%
Value3.9 s
51/100
25%
Value4.1 s
79/100
10%
Value350 ms
73/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value5.2 s
74/100
10%
1865 ms
20 ms
24 ms
51 ms
67 ms
Our browser made a total of 95 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 94% of them (89 requests) were addressed to the original Thejmg.com, 4% (4 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com and 2% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.2 sec) belongs to the original domain Thejmg.com.
Page size can be reduced by 1.5 MB (62%)
2.4 MB
885.3 kB
In fact, the total size of Thejmg.com main page is 2.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. CSS take 922.7 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 102.9 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 26.9 kB, which is 23% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 102.9 kB or 89% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 53.3 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Thejmg images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 506.7 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 506.7 kB or 73% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 809.2 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Thejmg.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 809.2 kB or 88% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 56 (61%)
92
36
The browser has sent 92 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Thejmg. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 24 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 34 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
thejmg.com
1865 ms
styles.css
20 ms
settings.css
24 ms
css
51 ms
css
67 ms
css
68 ms
colorbox.css
18 ms
portfolio.css
20 ms
settings.css
24 ms
css
69 ms
admin-ajax.php
2164 ms
dynamic.css
31 ms
bootstrap.min.css
35 ms
font-awesome.min.css
27 ms
ionicons.min.css
51 ms
cs-animate-elements.css
46 ms
style.css
48 ms
jquery.fancybox.css
54 ms
widgets.css
54 ms
js_composer.css
74 ms
jquery.js
59 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
55 ms
lightbox.js
57 ms
jquery.themepunch.tools.min.js
61 ms
jquery.themepunch.essential.min.js
62 ms
jquery.themepunch.revolution.min.js
66 ms
bootstrap.min.js
64 ms
cs_parallax.js
64 ms
jquery_cookie.min.js
66 ms
megamenu.js
67 ms
jquery.mousewheel.min.js
66 ms
jquery.fancybox.js
67 ms
main.js
67 ms
sticky.js
67 ms
widgets.js
89 ms
portfoliocarousel.css
88 ms
portfoliocarousel.style-4.css
87 ms
postcarousel.css
88 ms
postcarousel.style-2.css
90 ms
jquery.form.min.js
88 ms
scripts.js
86 ms
post_favorite.js
86 ms
js_composer_front.js
86 ms
waypoints.min.js
78 ms
waypoints.min.js
76 ms
jquery.colorbox.min.js
73 ms
jquery.bxslider.js
64 ms
jquery.jm-bxslider.js
60 ms
fonts.css
58 ms
pe-icon-7-stroke.css
57 ms
helper.css
53 ms
buttons.css
53 ms
module.css
53 ms
menu.css
52 ms
shortcodes.css
63 ms
style.min.css
56 ms
style-rtl.css
49 ms
responsive.css
49 ms
extensions.css
49 ms
logo_site1.jpg
49 ms
2500x380_homepage_image.jpg
47 ms
home_image.jpg
10 ms
junglo.jpg
8 ms
manishma1.jpg
10 ms
jamtch.jpg
10 ms
ynet.jpg
10 ms
toy.jpg
300 ms
haaretz.jpg
301 ms
debka.jpg
299 ms
jdate.jpg
305 ms
jewishjournal.jpg
302 ms
no-image.jpg
303 ms
jewishworldrewiev.jpg
302 ms
clients-1_09.jpg
302 ms
clients-1_09-160x105_c.jpg
302 ms
clients-1_10_011-160x105_c.jpg
305 ms
clients-1_10_031-160x105_c.jpg
306 ms
clients-1_10_051-160x105_c.jpg
304 ms
clients-1_191-160x105_c.jpg
305 ms
clients-1_20_011-160x105_c.jpg
306 ms
clients-1_20_051-160x105_c.jpg
306 ms
clients-1_20_071-160x105_c.jpg
307 ms
clients-1_301-160x105_c.jpg
310 ms
clients-1_31_011-160x105_c.jpg
309 ms
clients-1_10_07-160x105_c.jpg
307 ms
maxresdefault-160x105_c.jpg
311 ms
clients-1_35-160x105_c.jpg
310 ms
clients-1_31_05-160x105_c.jpg
313 ms
clients-1_31_07-160x105_c.jpg
311 ms
clients-1_351-160x105_c.jpg
311 ms
4GwpJM7qx9X5Obd9KsnKxQ.ttf
306 ms
zpv3sOKAbMf4wff105oLjw.ttf
307 ms
loader.gif
91 ms
overlay.png
91 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
37 ms
thejmg.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
thejmg.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
thejmg.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Page is blocked from indexing
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Thejmg.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Thejmg.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
thejmg.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Thejmg. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: