Tools & Wizards About Us
thelifeplushospital.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 5

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    21% of other websites

  • 75

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 41% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 81

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    42% of websites

thelifeplushospital.com

Life Plus

Page Load Speed

2.8 sec in total

First Response

389 ms

Resources Loaded

2.3 sec

Page Rendered

71 ms

thelifeplushospital.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to thelifeplushospital.com homepage info - get ready to check The Life Plus Hospital best content for India right away, or after learning these important things about thelifeplushospital.com

Visit thelifeplushospital.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Thelifeplushospital.com page load time and found that the first response time was 389 ms and then it took 2.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

thelifeplushospital.com performance score

5

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value5.2 s

8/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value22.3 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value11.9 s

4/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,760 ms

10/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.917

3/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value25.9 s

0/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

thelifeplushospital.com

389 ms

thelifeplushospital.com

775 ms

bootstrap.min.css

24 ms

bootstrap.min.css

30 ms

main.58ceec1e.js

764 ms

Our browser made a total of 11 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 36% of them (4 requests) were addressed to the original Thelifeplushospital.com, 27% (3 requests) were made to Cdn.jsdelivr.net and 9% (1 request) were made to Checkout.razorpay.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.1 sec) relates to the external source Checkout.razorpay.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 1.2 kB (2%)

Content Size

55.4 kB

After Optimization

54.2 kB

  • HTML
  • JavaScript

In fact, the total size of Thelifeplushospital.com main page is 55.4 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. Only 10% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 52.9 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-48%

Potential reduce by 1.2 kB

  • Original 2.4 kB
  • After minification 2.4 kB
  • After compression 1.3 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 1.2 kB or 48% of the original size.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 52.9 kB
  • After minification 52.9 kB
  • After compression 52.9 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 7 (78%)

Requests Now

9

After Optimization

2

  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 9 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of The Life Plus Hospital. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 5 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

thelifeplushospital.com

thelifeplushospital.com

389 ms

thelifeplushospital.com

thelifeplushospital.com

775 ms

bootstrap.min.css

bootstrap.min.css

24 ms

bootstrap.min.css

bootstrap.min.css

30 ms

main.58ceec1e.js

main.58ceec1e.js

764 ms

main.d59148e3.css

main.d59148e3.css

558 ms

bootstrap.bundle.min.js

bootstrap.bundle.min.js

21 ms

checkout.js

checkout.js

1133 ms

js

js

70 ms

css2

css2

29 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

34 ms

Accessibility Review

thelifeplushospital.com accessibility score

75

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

ARIA IDs are not unique

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).

High

List items (<li>) are not contained within <ul> or <ol> parent elements.

Best Practices

thelifeplushospital.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

thelifeplushospital.com SEO score

81

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    N/A

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Thelifeplushospital.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is English. Our system also found out that Thelifeplushospital.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

thelifeplushospital.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of The Life Plus Hospital. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: