Tools & Wizards About Us
themaxchallenge.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 13

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    25% of other websites

  • 91

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 76% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 86

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    60% of websites

themaxchallenge.com

Physical Fitness Centers New Jersey, New York | Fitness Program for Mind, Body, Spirit

Page Load Speed

4.8 sec in total

First Response

77 ms

Resources Loaded

1.7 sec

Page Rendered

2.9 sec

themaxchallenge.com screenshot

About Website

Visit themaxchallenge.com now to see the best up-to-date Themaxchallenge content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about themaxchallenge.com

THE MAX Challenge is a 10-week body transformation system designed to make fast and lasting changes to your appearance and overall well-being. We combine Nutritional Counseling, Fitness Classes, and M...

Visit themaxchallenge.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Themaxchallenge.com page load time and found that the first response time was 77 ms and then it took 4.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

themaxchallenge.com performance score

13

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.8 s

27/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value17.0 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value13.0 s

2/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value5,880 ms

0/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.173

69/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value29.3 s

0/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

themaxchallenge.com

77 ms

www.themaxchallenge.com

83 ms

www.themaxchallenge.com

184 ms

js

56 ms

gtm.js

110 ms

Our browser made a total of 77 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 74% of them (57 requests) were addressed to the original Themaxchallenge.com, 12% (9 requests) were made to I.ytimg.com and 3% (2 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (867 ms) belongs to the original domain Themaxchallenge.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 1.5 MB (12%)

Content Size

12.6 MB

After Optimization

11.1 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript

In fact, the total size of Themaxchallenge.com main page is 12.6 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 11.6 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-79%

Potential reduce by 235.5 kB

  • Original 299.0 kB
  • After minification 291.0 kB
  • After compression 63.6 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 235.5 kB or 79% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-11%

Potential reduce by 1.3 MB

  • Original 11.6 MB
  • After minification 10.4 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Themaxchallenge needs image optimization as it can save up to 1.3 MB or 11% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 7.7 kB

  • Original 672.5 kB
  • After minification 672.5 kB
  • After compression 664.8 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 40 (60%)

Requests Now

67

After Optimization

27

  • Images
  • JavaScript

The browser has sent 67 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Themaxchallenge. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 41 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

themaxchallenge.com

themaxchallenge.com

77 ms

www.themaxchallenge.com

www.themaxchallenge.com

83 ms

www.themaxchallenge.com

www.themaxchallenge.com

184 ms

js

js

56 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

110 ms

DOMPurify.min.js

DOMPurify.min.js

51 ms

jquery-1.12.4-wp.js

jquery-1.12.4-wp.js

94 ms

jquery-migrate-1.4.1-wp.js

jquery-migrate-1.4.1-wp.js

88 ms

svgs-inline-min.js

svgs-inline-min.js

94 ms

modernizr.custom.46504.js

modernizr.custom.46504.js

113 ms

loader.js

loader.js

68 ms

lazyload-shared.js

lazyload-shared.js

146 ms

lazyload-youtube.js

lazyload-youtube.js

140 ms

lazyload-vimeo.js

lazyload-vimeo.js

148 ms

combined.min.js

combined.min.js

156 ms

mediaelement-and-player.min.js

mediaelement-and-player.min.js

173 ms

mediaelement-migrate.min.js

mediaelement-migrate.min.js

169 ms

app.min.js

app.min.js

191 ms

app.min.1714396704.js

app.min.1714396704.js

364 ms

js_composer_front.min.js

js_composer_front.min.js

169 ms

js

js

98 ms

gmw.core.min.js

gmw.core.min.js

358 ms

waypoints.min.js

waypoints.min.js

333 ms

sb-youtube.min.js

sb-youtube.min.js

359 ms

wp-polyfill-inert.min.js

wp-polyfill-inert.min.js

358 ms

regenerator-runtime.min.js

regenerator-runtime.min.js

360 ms

wp-polyfill.min.js

wp-polyfill.min.js

364 ms

dom-ready.min.js

dom-ready.min.js

361 ms

hooks.min.js

hooks.min.js

362 ms

i18n.min.js

i18n.min.js

364 ms

a11y.min.js

a11y.min.js

365 ms

jquery.json.min.js

jquery.json.min.js

364 ms

gravityforms.min.js

gravityforms.min.js

366 ms

api.js

api.js

63 ms

jquery.maskedinput.min.js

jquery.maskedinput.min.js

366 ms

placeholders.jquery.min.js

placeholders.jquery.min.js

365 ms

utils.min.js

utils.min.js

367 ms

vendor-theme.min.js

vendor-theme.min.js

369 ms

scripts-theme.min.js

scripts-theme.min.js

367 ms

sdk.js

sdk.js

55 ms

sprite-compiled.svg

sprite-compiled.svg

256 ms

halftone-bg--tall--top.svg

halftone-bg--tall--top.svg

237 ms

logo.svg

logo.svg

239 ms

Angela-Before-and-After.png

Angela-Before-and-After.png

289 ms

Duane-Before-and-After_1.png

Duane-Before-and-After_1.png

288 ms

Kims-Before-and-After-pic.png

Kims-Before-and-After-pic.png

714 ms

Dolores-Before-and-After-edited.png

Dolores-Before-and-After-edited.png

312 ms

Gary-Before-and-After-edited-1.png

Gary-Before-and-After-edited-1.png

713 ms

Vicky-Before-and-After-final.png

Vicky-Before-and-After-final.png

748 ms

Jamie-Before-and-After-Final.png

Jamie-Before-and-After-Final.png

823 ms

34C804_0_0.woff

34C804_0_0.woff

706 ms

34C804_3_0.woff

34C804_3_0.woff

705 ms

34C804_2_0.woff

34C804_2_0.woff

818 ms

Katie-Before-and-after.png

Katie-Before-and-after.png

850 ms

Kristyn-Before-and-After.png

Kristyn-Before-and-After.png

867 ms

Melissa-Before-and-After-2.png

Melissa-Before-and-After-2.png

850 ms

sdk.js

sdk.js

19 ms

Juraj-Before-and-After.png

Juraj-Before-and-After.png

833 ms

placeholder.png

placeholder.png

684 ms

496 ms

fontello.woff

fontello.woff

707 ms

34C804_5_0.woff

34C804_5_0.woff

747 ms

34C804_1_0.woff

34C804_1_0.woff

754 ms

34C804_4_0.woff

34C804_4_0.woff

783 ms

money-back-gurantee-logo.svg

money-back-gurantee-logo.svg

747 ms

recaptcha__en.js

recaptcha__en.js

432 ms

iframe_api

iframe_api

187 ms

sddefault.jpg

sddefault.jpg

364 ms

sddefault.jpg

sddefault.jpg

335 ms

sddefault.jpg

sddefault.jpg

332 ms

sddefault.jpg

sddefault.jpg

387 ms

sddefault.jpg

sddefault.jpg

262 ms

sddefault.jpg

sddefault.jpg

426 ms

sddefault.jpg

sddefault.jpg

437 ms

sddefault.jpg

sddefault.jpg

378 ms

sddefault.jpg

sddefault.jpg

532 ms

www-widgetapi.js

www-widgetapi.js

49 ms

Accessibility Review

themaxchallenge.com accessibility score

91

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

High

Some elements have a [tabindex] value greater than 0

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

High

<object> elements do not have alternate text

Best Practices

themaxchallenge.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

themaxchallenge.com SEO score

86

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Themaxchallenge.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Themaxchallenge.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

themaxchallenge.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Themaxchallenge. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: