Tools & Wizards About Us
thepackagingportal.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 43

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    62% of other websites

  • 87

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 66% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 99

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    93% of websites

thepackagingportal.com

Homepage – ThePackagingPortal.com ThePackagingPortal.com

Page Load Speed

4.4 sec in total

First Response

204 ms

Resources Loaded

2.8 sec

Page Rendered

1.3 sec

thepackagingportal.com screenshot

About Website

Visit thepackagingportal.com now to see the best up-to-date The Packaging Portal content for United Kingdom and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about thepackagingportal.com

Welcome to www.thepackagingportal.com - The latest Corrugated, Folding Carton and Recycling Packaging Industry news and features, daily.

Visit thepackagingportal.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Thepackagingportal.com page load time and found that the first response time was 204 ms and then it took 4.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

thepackagingportal.com performance score

43

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.2 s

19/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value16.9 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value7.2 s

29/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value330 ms

75/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.007

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value13.7 s

11/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

thepackagingportal.com

204 ms

thepackagingportal.com

271 ms

www.thepackagingportal.com

221 ms

www.thepackagingportal.com

1122 ms

css

44 ms

Our browser made a total of 48 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 85% of them (41 requests) were addressed to the original Thepackagingportal.com, 4% (2 requests) were made to Fast.fonts.net and 4% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.1 sec) belongs to the original domain Thepackagingportal.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 385.6 kB (8%)

Content Size

5.0 MB

After Optimization

4.6 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript

In fact, the total size of Thepackagingportal.com main page is 5.0 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 4.9 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 35.2 kB

  • Original 42.3 kB
  • After minification 37.7 kB
  • After compression 7.2 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 4.7 kB, which is 11% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 35.2 kB or 83% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-7%

Potential reduce by 350.4 kB

  • Original 4.9 MB
  • After minification 4.6 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. The Packaging Portal images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 11 B

  • Original 4.9 kB
  • After minification 4.9 kB
  • After compression 4.9 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 5 (14%)

Requests Now

37

After Optimization

32

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 37 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of The Packaging Portal. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 6 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

thepackagingportal.com

thepackagingportal.com

204 ms

thepackagingportal.com

thepackagingportal.com

271 ms

www.thepackagingportal.com

www.thepackagingportal.com

221 ms

www.thepackagingportal.com

www.thepackagingportal.com

1122 ms

css

css

44 ms

29aed816-09e2-44ed-b050-a8777ac64117.js

29aed816-09e2-44ed-b050-a8777ac64117.js

78 ms

f37d9f5366.js

f37d9f5366.js

66 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

11 ms

style.css

style.css

26 ms

jquery.js

jquery.js

45 ms

iziModal.min.js

iziModal.min.js

51 ms

main.js

main.js

44 ms

wp-embed.min.js

wp-embed.min.js

35 ms

mt.js

mt.js

136 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

155 ms

TPP_Logo_2023.svg

TPP_Logo_2023.svg

256 ms

2024-IPBI-skyscraper-SuperCorrExpo.png

2024-IPBI-skyscraper-SuperCorrExpo.png

15 ms

EFI-Homepage-Skyscraper-1.gif

EFI-Homepage-Skyscraper-1.gif

19 ms

Palm-Print_Lead.jpg

Palm-Print_Lead.jpg

34 ms

EVOL2_WebBanner.gif

EVOL2_WebBanner.gif

27 ms

IPBIUK202203728x90px72dpi-1.jpg

IPBIUK202203728x90px72dpi-1.jpg

17 ms

Gopfert.gif

Gopfert.gif

72 ms

Palm-Print_Lead-860x658.jpg

Palm-Print_Lead-860x658.jpg

32 ms

Commencement_LEAD-860x658.jpg

Commencement_LEAD-860x658.jpg

34 ms

PW15_LEAD-860x658.jpg

PW15_LEAD-860x658.jpg

37 ms

Mitchell_LEAD-860x658.jpg

Mitchell_LEAD-860x658.jpg

70 ms

Alpha_LEAD-860x658.jpg

Alpha_LEAD-860x658.jpg

50 ms

Serra-Website-May-Dec.jpg

Serra-Website-May-Dec.jpg

48 ms

Screenshot-2024-05-24-at-09.48.08-1280x720.png

Screenshot-2024-05-24-at-09.48.08-1280x720.png

69 ms

icon-play.svg

icon-play.svg

303 ms

Screenshot-2024-05-19-at-08.35.55-1280x720.png

Screenshot-2024-05-19-at-08.35.55-1280x720.png

797 ms

TPP-26th-August-2024-Vol-38-Issue-16_Thumbnail-330x450.jpg

TPP-26th-August-2024-Vol-38-Issue-16_Thumbnail-330x450.jpg

71 ms

TPP-12th-August-2024-Vol-38-Issue-15_Thumb-330x450.jpg

TPP-12th-August-2024-Vol-38-Issue-15_Thumb-330x450.jpg

73 ms

RFN-August-2024_Thumb-330x450.jpg

RFN-August-2024_Thumb-330x450.jpg

72 ms

TPP-29th-July-2024-Vol-38-Issue-14_Thumb-330x450.jpg

TPP-29th-July-2024-Vol-38-Issue-14_Thumb-330x450.jpg

91 ms

TPP-15th-July-2024-Vol-38-Issue-13_Thumb-330x450.jpg

TPP-15th-July-2024-Vol-38-Issue-13_Thumb-330x450.jpg

82 ms

IPBI_JulyAug_Thumb-330x450.jpg

IPBI_JulyAug_Thumb-330x450.jpg

86 ms

att00001-5cfe5d34bd6fd.gif

att00001-5cfe5d34bd6fd.gif

93 ms

Suppliers-1200x675.jpg

Suppliers-1200x675.jpg

654 ms

Barberan-Website.gif

Barberan-Website.gif

108 ms

BP_Logo_2023.svg

BP_Logo_2023.svg

347 ms

fa-regular-400.woff

fa-regular-400.woff

603 ms

fa-light-300.woff

fa-light-300.woff

411 ms

fa-solid-900.woff

fa-solid-900.woff

799 ms

fa-brands-400.woff

fa-brands-400.woff

756 ms

icomoon.ttf

icomoon.ttf

666 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfBBc-AMP6lQ.woff

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfBBc-AMP6lQ.woff

17 ms

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxMKTU1Kg.woff

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxMKTU1Kg.woff

23 ms

Accessibility Review

thepackagingportal.com accessibility score

87

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

[aria-hidden="true"] elements contain focusable descendents

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

thepackagingportal.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

thepackagingportal.com SEO score

99

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Thepackagingportal.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Thepackagingportal.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

thepackagingportal.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of The Packaging Portal. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: