Tools & Wizards About Us
thepearmac.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 81

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    86% of other websites

  • 63

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 28% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 92

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    74% of websites

thepearmac.com

thepearmac.com - thepearmac Resources and Information.

Page Load Speed

4.9 sec in total

First Response

198 ms

Resources Loaded

4.3 sec

Page Rendered

418 ms

thepearmac.com screenshot

About Website

Visit thepearmac.com now to see the best up-to-date Thepearmac content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about thepearmac.com

thepearmac.com is your first and best source for all of the information you’re looking for. From general topics to more of what you would expect to find here, thepearmac.com has it all. We hope you fi...

Visit thepearmac.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Thepearmac.com page load time and found that the first response time was 198 ms and then it took 4.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

thepearmac.com performance score

81

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value0.9 s

100/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value0.9 s

100/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value2.5 s

98/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value700 ms

43/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.068

96/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value3.6 s

92/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

domain_profile.cfm

198 ms

jquery.fancybox.min.css

111 ms

reboot.min.css

108 ms

style.css

168 ms

responsive.css

182 ms

Our browser made a total of 58 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 0% of them (0 request) were addressed to the original Thepearmac.com, 10% (6 requests) were made to Youtube.com and 9% (5 requests) were made to Hugedomains.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.7 sec) relates to the external source Youtube.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 382.0 kB (63%)

Content Size

609.1 kB

After Optimization

227.1 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Thepearmac.com main page is 609.1 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. CSS take 420.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-79%

Potential reduce by 33.7 kB

  • Original 42.8 kB
  • After minification 42.8 kB
  • After compression 9.1 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 33.7 kB or 79% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-6%

Potential reduce by 1.0 kB

  • Original 16.2 kB
  • After minification 15.2 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Thepearmac images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-22%

Potential reduce by 29.0 kB

  • Original 129.5 kB
  • After minification 129.5 kB
  • After compression 100.6 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 29.0 kB or 22% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-76%

Potential reduce by 318.3 kB

  • Original 420.5 kB
  • After minification 418.7 kB
  • After compression 102.2 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Thepearmac.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 318.3 kB or 76% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 33 (63%)

Requests Now

52

After Optimization

19

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 52 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Thepearmac. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 15 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 9 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

domain_profile.cfm

domain_profile.cfm

198 ms

jquery.fancybox.min.css

jquery.fancybox.min.css

111 ms

reboot.min.css

reboot.min.css

108 ms

style.css

style.css

168 ms

responsive.css

responsive.css

182 ms

hd-style.css

hd-style.css

260 ms

css

css

100 ms

zyw6mds.css

zyw6mds.css

80 ms

js

js

98 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

244 ms

intlTelInput.js

intlTelInput.js

289 ms

script.js

script.js

378 ms

common.js

common.js

405 ms

hd-js.js

hd-js.js

376 ms

p.css

p.css

212 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

117 ms

hugedomains_logo.svg

hugedomains_logo.svg

54 ms

phone-icon.png

phone-icon.png

52 ms

search-icon.png

search-icon.png

68 ms

favorite-header.png

favorite-header.png

168 ms

cart.png

cart.png

69 ms

30daysmallico.png

30daysmallico.png

66 ms

roket-side-ico.png

roket-side-ico.png

68 ms

safesmallico.png

safesmallico.png

67 ms

zero-side-ico.png

zero-side-ico.png

120 ms

mail-icon.png

mail-icon.png

120 ms

footer-logo-1.png

footer-logo-1.png

120 ms

footer-logo-2.png

footer-logo-2.png

118 ms

footer-logo-3.png

footer-logo-3.png

119 ms

footer-logo-4.png

footer-logo-4.png

247 ms

footer-logo-5.png

footer-logo-5.png

246 ms

o-0IIpQlx3QUlC5A4PNr5TRF.ttf

o-0IIpQlx3QUlC5A4PNr5TRF.ttf

133 ms

o-0NIpQlx3QUlC5A4PNjXhFVZNyE.ttf

o-0NIpQlx3QUlC5A4PNjXhFVZNyE.ttf

216 ms

d

d

65 ms

bqLUp7GuUTg

bqLUp7GuUTg

273 ms

test-content-img-left.png

test-content-img-left.png

183 ms

test-content-img-right.png

test-content-img-right.png

184 ms

qs-item-bg.png

qs-item-bg.png

183 ms

collect

collect

146 ms

collect

collect

58 ms

ec.js

ec.js

140 ms

favorite-domain.cfm

favorite-domain.cfm

2574 ms

favorite-domain.cfm

favorite-domain.cfm

2576 ms

invisible.js

invisible.js

96 ms

collect

collect

2648 ms

collect

collect

46 ms

www-player.css

www-player.css

2492 ms

www-embed-player.js

www-embed-player.js

2568 ms

base.js

base.js

2654 ms

fetch-polyfill.js

fetch-polyfill.js

2486 ms

75a2403dbcf357ae

75a2403dbcf357ae

186 ms

ga-audiences

ga-audiences

396 ms

ad_status.js

ad_status.js

207 ms

PJkulU-G08v7JckZMeNSZvqVIBPCjlLmLXUvorg-pEg.js

PJkulU-G08v7JckZMeNSZvqVIBPCjlLmLXUvorg-pEg.js

65 ms

embed.js

embed.js

13 ms

id

id

75 ms

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf

169 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9.ttf

171 ms

Accessibility Review

thepearmac.com accessibility score

63

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

thepearmac.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

High

Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools

SEO Factors

thepearmac.com SEO score

92

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Page is blocked from indexing

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Thepearmac.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Thepearmac.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

thepearmac.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Thepearmac. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: