1.5 sec in total
81 ms
1.4 sec
80 ms
Click here to check amazing The RATT Pack content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about therattpack.com
Official site with band information, tour dates, news, audio and videos, photos and more.
Visit therattpack.comWe analyzed Therattpack.com page load time and found that the first response time was 81 ms and then it took 1.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 30% of websites can load faster.
therattpack.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.1 s
82/100
10%
Value4.1 s
48/100
25%
Value6.4 s
40/100
10%
Value990 ms
27/100
30%
Value0.002
100/100
15%
Value16.1 s
6/100
10%
81 ms
48 ms
92 ms
857 ms
68 ms
Our browser made a total of 37 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 3% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Therattpack.com, 35% (13 requests) were made to Static.parastorage.com and 32% (12 requests) were made to Sentry-next.wixpress.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (857 ms) relates to the external source Polyfill-fastly.io.
Page size can be reduced by 611.1 kB (51%)
1.2 MB
588.3 kB
In fact, the total size of Therattpack.com main page is 1.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 30% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 683.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 547.3 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 547.3 kB or 80% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 15.6 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. The RATT Pack images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 48.1 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 48.1 kB or 17% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 11 (46%)
24
13
The browser has sent 24 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of The RATT Pack. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 12 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.therattpack.com
81 ms
minified.js
48 ms
focus-within-polyfill.js
92 ms
polyfill.min.js
857 ms
thunderbolt-commons.f07ad842.bundle.min.js
68 ms
main.aba140a9.bundle.min.js
73 ms
main.renderer.1d21f023.bundle.min.js
68 ms
lodash.min.js
71 ms
react.production.min.js
69 ms
react-dom.production.min.js
73 ms
siteTags.bundle.min.js
71 ms
wix-perf-measure.umd.min.js
72 ms
875dbd_7122ae84abd341a696372335d670b9db~mv2.png
321 ms
022ac7_63a57ccc6a3646a9af9c5d45101786b6~mv2.png
331 ms
022ac7_3d813f3b80084419b95a28301a60d9e6~mv2.jpg
329 ms
022ac7_3d813f3b80084419b95a28301a60d9e6~mv2.jpg
331 ms
022ac7_2ab1311ca7cd4223923972c37c15fa6b~mv2.jpg
329 ms
022ac7_2ab1311ca7cd4223923972c37c15fa6b~mv2.jpg
328 ms
022ac7_37b8f7d4aa8f43d18530ce6649001d9a~mv2.jpg
331 ms
022ac7_37b8f7d4aa8f43d18530ce6649001d9a~mv2.jpg
334 ms
bundle.min.js
63 ms
134 ms
132 ms
128 ms
127 ms
121 ms
125 ms
159 ms
157 ms
155 ms
152 ms
157 ms
152 ms
deprecation-en.v5.html
8 ms
bolt-performance
33 ms
deprecation-style.v5.css
11 ms
right-arrow.svg
11 ms
therattpack.com accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
therattpack.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
therattpack.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Therattpack.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Therattpack.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
therattpack.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of The RATT Pack. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: