5.1 sec in total
361 ms
4.2 sec
465 ms
Welcome to theresia.es homepage info - get ready to check Theresia best content right away, or after learning these important things about theresia.es
Fabricantes de uniformes escolares con imagen y estilo propio. Última tecnología y máxima calidad al mejor precio. ¡100% personalizables!
Visit theresia.esWe analyzed Theresia.es page load time and found that the first response time was 361 ms and then it took 4.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.
theresia.es performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value6.5 s
2/100
10%
Value10.2 s
0/100
25%
Value8.7 s
16/100
10%
Value330 ms
75/100
30%
Value0.672
8/100
15%
Value9.4 s
30/100
10%
361 ms
444 ms
992 ms
380 ms
445 ms
Our browser made a total of 111 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 92% of them (102 requests) were addressed to the original Theresia.es, 3% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 2% (2 requests) were made to Pdcc.gdpr.es. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (992 ms) belongs to the original domain Theresia.es.
Page size can be reduced by 207.4 kB (34%)
614.1 kB
406.7 kB
In fact, the total size of Theresia.es main page is 614.1 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 289.9 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 103.6 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 103.6 kB or 79% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 951 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Theresia images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 60.8 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 60.8 kB or 21% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 42.1 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Theresia.es needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 42.1 kB or 23% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 99 (95%)
104
5
The browser has sent 104 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Theresia. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 48 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 53 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
theresia.es
361 ms
theresia.es
444 ms
www.theresia.es
992 ms
pdcc.min.css
380 ms
pdcc.min.js
445 ms
grid.css
229 ms
base.css
364 ms
layout.css
380 ms
blog.css
359 ms
postslider.css
337 ms
buttons.css
350 ms
comments.css
347 ms
contact.css
456 ms
gallery.css
461 ms
google_maps.css
464 ms
grid_row.css
472 ms
heading.css
479 ms
hr.css
494 ms
icon.css
572 ms
iconbox.css
576 ms
iconlist.css
577 ms
image.css
586 ms
slideshow.css
601 ms
contentslider.css
608 ms
masonry_entries.css
693 ms
avia-snippet-site-preloader.css
691 ms
menu.css
692 ms
numbers.css
700 ms
portfolio.css
715 ms
slideshow_fullsize.css
722 ms
social_share.css
806 ms
tab_section.css
805 ms
table.css
812 ms
tabs.css
812 ms
team.css
829 ms
testimonials.css
833 ms
video.css
917 ms
sbi-styles.min.css
937 ms
style.min.css
966 ms
shortcodes.css
942 ms
magnific-popup.css
835 ms
avia-snippet-lightbox.css
722 ms
avia-snippet-widget.css
708 ms
mediaelementplayer-legacy.min.css
715 ms
wp-mediaelement.min.css
711 ms
enfold.css
743 ms
custom.css
699 ms
gravity-mod.css
703 ms
css
36 ms
bootstrap.css
764 ms
bootstrap-theme.css
723 ms
client.css
717 ms
calendar.css
713 ms
premium-marine.css
719 ms
search-form.css
723 ms
timeline_v2.css
730 ms
timeline_skin_v2.css
720 ms
jquery.min.js
801 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
732 ms
avia-compat.js
728 ms
wpbc_vars.js
726 ms
bootstrap.js
761 ms
wpbc-migrate.js
725 ms
jquery.datepick.js
806 ms
jquery.datepick-es.js
743 ms
client.js
771 ms
wpbc_times.js
796 ms
jquery.meio.mask.min.js
728 ms
personal.js
771 ms
biz_s.js
768 ms
biz_m.js
803 ms
form-conditions.js
782 ms
biz_l.js
806 ms
iDEAL.js
732 ms
timeline_v2.js
761 ms
avia.js
943 ms
shortcodes.js
947 ms
contact.js
943 ms
gallery.js
922 ms
iconlist.js
849 ms
slideshow.js
834 ms
isotope.js
968 ms
masonry_entries.js
947 ms
menu.js
919 ms
numbers.js
901 ms
portfolio.js
828 ms
slideshow-video.js
834 ms
tab_section.js
932 ms
tabs.js
921 ms
testimonials.js
910 ms
video.js
900 ms
jquery.magnific-popup.min.js
851 ms
avia-snippet-lightbox.js
836 ms
avia-snippet-megamenu.js
910 ms
avia-snippet-sticky-header.js
904 ms
avia-snippet-widget.js
906 ms
mediaelement-and-player.min.js
927 ms
mediaelement-migrate.min.js
841 ms
wp-mediaelement.min.js
818 ms
avia_blocks_front.js
884 ms
smush-lazy-load.min.js
867 ms
gtm.js
241 ms
sbi-sprite.png
654 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4gaVc.ttf
18 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1x4gaVc.ttf
25 ms
entypo-fontello.woff
603 ms
0QInMXVJ-o-oRn_7dron8YW-9JzW.ttf
44 ms
js
125 ms
theresia-school-logo-color-margen-superior-retina.png
176 ms
theresia-school-logo-blanco.png
125 ms
hotjar-1254268.js
167 ms
theresia.es accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
theresia.es best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
theresia.es SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
robots.txt is not valid
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
ES
ES
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Theresia.es can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Spanish is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Theresia.es main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
theresia.es
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Theresia. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: