Tools & Wizards About Us
theswaggink.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 41

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    60% of other websites

  • 48

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 20% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 92

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    74% of websites

theswaggink.com

The Swagg Ink | Creative Web Design & Development Agency |

Page Load Speed

4.2 sec in total

First Response

271 ms

Resources Loaded

2.8 sec

Page Rendered

1.1 sec

theswaggink.com screenshot

About Website

Visit theswaggink.com now to see the best up-to-date The Swagg Ink content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about theswaggink.com

The Swagg Ink specialises in website & graphic design, social media management, SEO & branding. We have been involved in many industry defining projects.

Visit theswaggink.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Theswaggink.com page load time and found that the first response time was 271 ms and then it took 3.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

theswaggink.com performance score

41

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.6 s

33/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value8.4 s

2/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value14.5 s

1/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value110 ms

98/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.262

47/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value20.2 s

2/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

theswaggink.com

271 ms

bootstrap.min.css

428 ms

style.css

370 ms

venobox.css

253 ms

custom.css

215 ms

Our browser made a total of 93 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 81% of them (75 requests) were addressed to the original Theswaggink.com, 9% (8 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 4% (4 requests) were made to Platform.twitter.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.3 sec) belongs to the original domain Theswaggink.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 405.7 kB (5%)

Content Size

8.5 MB

After Optimization

8.0 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Theswaggink.com main page is 8.5 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 7.9 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-91%

Potential reduce by 49.1 kB

  • Original 54.0 kB
  • After minification 35.5 kB
  • After compression 4.9 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 18.4 kB, which is 34% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 49.1 kB or 91% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 2.6 kB

  • Original 7.9 MB
  • After minification 7.9 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. The Swagg Ink images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-69%

Potential reduce by 138.9 kB

  • Original 200.2 kB
  • After minification 189.5 kB
  • After compression 61.3 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 138.9 kB or 69% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-85%

Potential reduce by 215.1 kB

  • Original 252.0 kB
  • After minification 235.6 kB
  • After compression 36.9 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Theswaggink.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 215.1 kB or 85% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 14 (17%)

Requests Now

83

After Optimization

69

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 83 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of The Swagg Ink. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 9 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 7 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

theswaggink.com

theswaggink.com

271 ms

bootstrap.min.css

bootstrap.min.css

428 ms

style.css

style.css

370 ms

venobox.css

venobox.css

253 ms

custom.css

custom.css

215 ms

modernizer.js

modernizer.js

350 ms

widgets.js

widgets.js

277 ms

all.js

all.js

724 ms

custom.js

custom.js

327 ms

venobox.min.js

venobox.min.js

382 ms

portfolio.js

portfolio.js

445 ms

hoverdir.js

hoverdir.js

459 ms

css

css

29 ms

animate.css

animate.css

243 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

210 ms

loader.gif

loader.gif

177 ms

instagram.png

instagram.png

178 ms

youtube.jpg

youtube.jpg

179 ms

facebook.jpg

facebook.jpg

207 ms

twitter.png

twitter.png

177 ms

silogo.png

silogo.png

224 ms

cover1.jpg

cover1.jpg

506 ms

cover2.jpg

cover2.jpg

635 ms

cover3.jpg

cover3.jpg

568 ms

cover4.jpg

cover4.jpg

604 ms

cover5.jpg

cover5.jpg

604 ms

cover6.jpg

cover6.jpg

586 ms

cover7.jpg

cover7.jpg

744 ms

cover88.jpg

cover88.jpg

737 ms

cover9.jpg

cover9.jpg

835 ms

cover11.jpg

cover11.jpg

832 ms

cover12.jpg

cover12.jpg

856 ms

cover13.jpg

cover13.jpg

922 ms

cover14.jpg

cover14.jpg

972 ms

cover15.jpg

cover15.jpg

1051 ms

cover16.jpg

cover16.jpg

985 ms

logo01.jpg

logo01.jpg

960 ms

logo02.jpg

logo02.jpg

958 ms

logo03.jpg

logo03.jpg

1031 ms

logo04.jpg

logo04.jpg

1103 ms

logo05.jpg

logo05.jpg

1084 ms

logo06.jpg

logo06.jpg

1145 ms

logo07.jpg

logo07.jpg

1116 ms

logo08.jpg

logo08.jpg

1168 ms

logo09.jpg

logo09.jpg

1167 ms

logo100.jpg

logo100.jpg

1215 ms

logo11.jpg

logo11.jpg

1234 ms

logo12.jpg

logo12.jpg

1235 ms

logo13.jpg

logo13.jpg

1290 ms

like.php

like.php

167 ms

logo14.jpg

logo14.jpg

1262 ms

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf

21 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9.ttf

27 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmSU5fBBc9.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmSU5fBBc9.ttf

38 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfBBc9.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfBBc9.ttf

78 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmYUtfBBc9.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmYUtfBBc9.ttf

127 ms

BngbUXZYTXPIvIBgJJSb6s3BzlRRfKOFbvjoa4Omb2Rm.ttf

BngbUXZYTXPIvIBgJJSb6s3BzlRRfKOFbvjoa4Omb2Rm.ttf

129 ms

BngbUXZYTXPIvIBgJJSb6s3BzlRRfKOFbvjojISmb2Rm.ttf

BngbUXZYTXPIvIBgJJSb6s3BzlRRfKOFbvjojISmb2Rm.ttf

128 ms

BngbUXZYTXPIvIBgJJSb6s3BzlRRfKOFbvjo0oSmb2Rm.ttf

BngbUXZYTXPIvIBgJJSb6s3BzlRRfKOFbvjo0oSmb2Rm.ttf

128 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

1216 ms

widget_iframe.2f70fb173b9000da126c79afe2098f02.html

widget_iframe.2f70fb173b9000da126c79afe2098f02.html

151 ms

logo15.jpg

logo15.jpg

1183 ms

logo16.jpg

logo16.jpg

1182 ms

logo17.jpg

logo17.jpg

1183 ms

logo18.jpg

logo18.jpg

1221 ms

iFHdqkg-hVK.js

iFHdqkg-hVK.js

36 ms

logo19.jpg

logo19.jpg

1252 ms

FEppCFCt76d.png

FEppCFCt76d.png

30 ms

logo20.jpg

logo20.jpg

1242 ms

settings

settings

72 ms

button.856debeac157d9669cf51e73a08fbc93.js

button.856debeac157d9669cf51e73a08fbc93.js

72 ms

embeds

embeds

22 ms

follow_button.2f70fb173b9000da126c79afe2098f02.en.html

follow_button.2f70fb173b9000da126c79afe2098f02.en.html

81 ms

logo21.jpg

logo21.jpg

957 ms

logo22.jpg

logo22.jpg

901 ms

logo23.jpg

logo23.jpg

897 ms

logo24.jpg

logo24.jpg

960 ms

ill02e.jpg

ill02e.jpg

1025 ms

ill03.jpg

ill03.jpg

1013 ms

ill01.jpg

ill01.jpg

864 ms

ill04.jpg

ill04.jpg

883 ms

merch01.jpg

merch01.jpg

790 ms

merch02.jpg

merch02.jpg

847 ms

merch03.jpg

merch03.jpg

870 ms

cover00.jpg

cover00.jpg

867 ms

html01.jpg

html01.jpg

823 ms

html03.jpg

html03.jpg

829 ms

html04.jpg

html04.jpg

828 ms

html05.jpg

html05.jpg

832 ms

html06.jpg

html06.jpg

832 ms

html07.jpg

html07.jpg

858 ms

html02.jpg

html02.jpg

844 ms

html08.jpg

html08.jpg

823 ms

Accessibility Review

theswaggink.com accessibility score

48

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

theswaggink.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

theswaggink.com SEO score

92

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Theswaggink.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Theswaggink.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

theswaggink.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of The Swagg Ink. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: