Tools & Wizards About Us
thevideoeditor.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 29

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    49% of other websites

  • 75

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 42% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 86

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    60% of websites

thevideoeditor.com

Photo Scanning Service | Video Transfer Service - The Video Editor

Page Load Speed

4.4 sec in total

First Response

146 ms

Resources Loaded

4 sec

Page Rendered

203 ms

thevideoeditor.com screenshot

About Website

Visit thevideoeditor.com now to see the best up-to-date The Video Editor content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about thevideoeditor.com

Our photo scanning & video transfer services allow you to digitally protect photo, & film memories forever. All work digitized by hand with care in the U.S.A. Simple, Safe, and Secure since 1993.

Visit thevideoeditor.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Thevideoeditor.com page load time and found that the first response time was 146 ms and then it took 4.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

thevideoeditor.com performance score

29

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.0 s

50/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value4.9 s

28/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value7.6 s

26/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value3,990 ms

1/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.094

91/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value18.7 s

3/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

thevideoeditor.com

146 ms

main.css

43 ms

drop-menu.js

81 ms

jquery.js

154 ms

easySlider1.7.js

179 ms

Our browser made a total of 44 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 95% of them (42 requests) were addressed to the original Thevideoeditor.com, 5% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (3.3 sec) belongs to the original domain Thevideoeditor.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 238.4 kB (24%)

Content Size

1.0 MB

After Optimization

769.2 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Thevideoeditor.com main page is 1.0 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 666.1 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-80%

Potential reduce by 17.5 kB

  • Original 22.0 kB
  • After minification 17.6 kB
  • After compression 4.4 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 4.4 kB, which is 20% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 17.5 kB or 80% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 3.7 kB

  • Original 666.1 kB
  • After minification 662.3 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. The Video Editor images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-67%

Potential reduce by 206.6 kB

  • Original 306.6 kB
  • After minification 302.7 kB
  • After compression 100.0 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 206.6 kB or 67% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-81%

Potential reduce by 10.5 kB

  • Original 12.9 kB
  • After minification 9.4 kB
  • After compression 2.4 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Thevideoeditor.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 10.5 kB or 81% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 13 (30%)

Requests Now

43

After Optimization

30

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 43 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of The Video Editor. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 7 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

thevideoeditor.com

thevideoeditor.com

146 ms

main.css

main.css

43 ms

drop-menu.js

drop-menu.js

81 ms

jquery.js

jquery.js

154 ms

easySlider1.7.js

easySlider1.7.js

179 ms

cufon-yui.js

cufon-yui.js

313 ms

Humanst521_BT.js

Humanst521_BT.js

490 ms

swfobject.js

swfobject.js

476 ms

body-wave-bg.png

body-wave-bg.png

80 ms

top-bar-bg.png

top-bar-bg.png

179 ms

top-phone.png

top-phone.png

278 ms

logo.png

logo.png

379 ms

nav-round-right.png

nav-round-right.png

480 ms

nav-round-left.png

nav-round-left.png

578 ms

nav-bg.png

nav-bg.png

678 ms

video-production.png

video-production.png

853 ms

video-editing.png

video-editing.png

883 ms

corporate-video-production.png

corporate-video-production.png

1052 ms

website-video-production.png

website-video-production.png

1115 ms

results.png

results.png

1177 ms

h1-img.png

h1-img.png

1277 ms

quote-button-1.png

quote-button-1.png

1377 ms

featured-services-hdr.png

featured-services-hdr.png

1476 ms

whychoose-hdr.png

whychoose-hdr.png

1576 ms

whychoose-img1.jpg

whychoose-img1.jpg

1675 ms

whychoose-img2.jpg

whychoose-img2.jpg

1775 ms

whychoose-img3.jpg

whychoose-img3.jpg

1876 ms

acclaim-hdr.png

acclaim-hdr.png

1977 ms

feature-box-bottom.png

feature-box-bottom.png

2074 ms

testimonial-box-bottom.png

testimonial-box-bottom.png

2176 ms

twitter-icon.png

twitter-icon.png

2276 ms

facebook-icon.png

facebook-icon.png

2375 ms

linkedin-icon.png

linkedin-icon.png

2475 ms

youtube-icon.png

youtube-icon.png

2573 ms

blogger-icon.png

blogger-icon.png

2673 ms

hbar-divider.png

hbar-divider.png

2763 ms

digital-transfer-box.png

digital-transfer-box.png

2863 ms

video-prod-box.png

video-prod-box.png

2963 ms

video-editing-box.png

video-editing-box.png

3102 ms

whychoose-box.png

whychoose-box.png

3163 ms

ga.js

ga.js

4 ms

__utm.gif

__utm.gif

11 ms

btn_prev.png

btn_prev.png

3222 ms

btn_next.png

btn_next.png

3323 ms

Accessibility Review

thevideoeditor.com accessibility score

75

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<dl>'s do not contain only properly-ordered <dt> and <dd> groups, <script>, <template> or <div> elements.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best Practices

thevideoeditor.com best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

thevideoeditor.com SEO score

86

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Thevideoeditor.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Thevideoeditor.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

thevideoeditor.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of The Video Editor. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: