Tools & Wizards About Us
theworstdm.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 36

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    55% of other websites

  • 89

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 71% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 92

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    74% of websites

theworstdm.com

theworstdm.com - theworstdm Resources and Information.

Page Load Speed

5.3 sec in total

First Response

233 ms

Resources Loaded

4.6 sec

Page Rendered

523 ms

theworstdm.com screenshot

About Website

Visit theworstdm.com now to see the best up-to-date Theworstdm content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about theworstdm.com

theworstdm.com is your first and best source for all of the information you’re looking for. From general topics to more of what you would expect to find here, theworstdm.com has it all. We hope you fi...

Visit theworstdm.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Theworstdm.com page load time and found that the first response time was 233 ms and then it took 5.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 75% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

theworstdm.com performance score

36

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.2 s

20/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value6.2 s

11/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value4.2 s

78/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,240 ms

19/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.078

95/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value8.6 s

37/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

domain_profile.cfm

233 ms

jquery.fancybox.min.css

427 ms

reboot.min.css

551 ms

style.css

565 ms

responsive.css

742 ms

Our browser made a total of 58 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 0% of them (0 request) were addressed to the original Theworstdm.com, 10% (6 requests) were made to Youtube.com and 9% (5 requests) were made to Hugedomains.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.4 sec) relates to the external source Hugedomains.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 383.1 kB (63%)

Content Size

610.5 kB

After Optimization

227.4 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Theworstdm.com main page is 610.5 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. CSS take 421.9 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-79%

Potential reduce by 33.9 kB

  • Original 43.1 kB
  • After minification 43.1 kB
  • After compression 9.2 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 33.9 kB or 79% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-6%

Potential reduce by 1.0 kB

  • Original 16.2 kB
  • After minification 15.2 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Theworstdm images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-22%

Potential reduce by 28.8 kB

  • Original 129.3 kB
  • After minification 129.3 kB
  • After compression 100.5 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 28.8 kB or 22% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-76%

Potential reduce by 319.3 kB

  • Original 421.9 kB
  • After minification 420.1 kB
  • After compression 102.6 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Theworstdm.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 319.3 kB or 76% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 33 (63%)

Requests Now

52

After Optimization

19

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 52 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Theworstdm. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 15 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 9 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

domain_profile.cfm

domain_profile.cfm

233 ms

jquery.fancybox.min.css

jquery.fancybox.min.css

427 ms

reboot.min.css

reboot.min.css

551 ms

style.css

style.css

565 ms

responsive.css

responsive.css

742 ms

hd-style.css

hd-style.css

754 ms

css

css

440 ms

zyw6mds.css

zyw6mds.css

715 ms

js

js

462 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

808 ms

intlTelInput.js

intlTelInput.js

811 ms

script.js

script.js

812 ms

common.js

common.js

811 ms

hd-js.js

hd-js.js

810 ms

p.css

p.css

114 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

426 ms

hugedomains_logo.svg

hugedomains_logo.svg

397 ms

phone-icon.png

phone-icon.png

268 ms

search-icon.png

search-icon.png

300 ms

favorite-header.png

favorite-header.png

301 ms

cart.png

cart.png

302 ms

30daysmallico.png

30daysmallico.png

299 ms

roket-side-ico.png

roket-side-ico.png

545 ms

safesmallico.png

safesmallico.png

533 ms

zero-side-ico.png

zero-side-ico.png

544 ms

mail-icon.png

mail-icon.png

532 ms

footer-logo-1.png

footer-logo-1.png

500 ms

footer-logo-2.png

footer-logo-2.png

543 ms

footer-logo-3.png

footer-logo-3.png

548 ms

footer-logo-4.png

footer-logo-4.png

547 ms

footer-logo-5.png

footer-logo-5.png

547 ms

o-0IIpQlx3QUlC5A4PNr5TRF.ttf

o-0IIpQlx3QUlC5A4PNr5TRF.ttf

365 ms

o-0NIpQlx3QUlC5A4PNjXhFVZNyE.ttf

o-0NIpQlx3QUlC5A4PNjXhFVZNyE.ttf

381 ms

d

d

265 ms

collect

collect

166 ms

collect

collect

132 ms

collect

collect

163 ms

test-content-img-left.png

test-content-img-left.png

99 ms

bqLUp7GuUTg

bqLUp7GuUTg

396 ms

test-content-img-right.png

test-content-img-right.png

39 ms

qs-item-bg.png

qs-item-bg.png

63 ms

ec.js

ec.js

43 ms

ga-audiences

ga-audiences

347 ms

favorite-domain.cfm

favorite-domain.cfm

1394 ms

favorite-domain.cfm

favorite-domain.cfm

949 ms

invisible.js

invisible.js

153 ms

collect

collect

121 ms

www-player.css

www-player.css

100 ms

www-embed-player.js

www-embed-player.js

186 ms

base.js

base.js

835 ms

fetch-polyfill.js

fetch-polyfill.js

93 ms

756de80f39fc8214

756de80f39fc8214

849 ms

ad_status.js

ad_status.js

381 ms

T7RR7T3eD2Mknuht0zvCjq8QpPtuwIS4RR0IBPt1mq4.js

T7RR7T3eD2Mknuht0zvCjq8QpPtuwIS4RR0IBPt1mq4.js

101 ms

embed.js

embed.js

35 ms

id

id

63 ms

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf

221 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9.ttf

223 ms

Accessibility Review

theworstdm.com accessibility score

89

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

theworstdm.com best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

theworstdm.com SEO score

92

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Theworstdm.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Theworstdm.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

theworstdm.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Theworstdm. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: