Tools & Wizards About Us
think.design screenshot

Report Summary

  • 14

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    26% of other websites

  • 87

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 66% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 80

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    42% of websites

think.design

Think Design | Pioneering Innovative Solutions Globally

Page Load Speed

1.2 sec in total

First Response

79 ms

Resources Loaded

792 ms

Page Rendered

352 ms

think.design screenshot

About Website

Welcome to think.design homepage info - get ready to check Think best content for India right away, or after learning these important things about think.design

Think Design, a UX Strategy firm, hosts CX experts in User Research, Data Design, UI UX Design. Learn more about our our award-winning approach here.

Visit think.design

Key Findings

We analyzed Think.design page load time and found that the first response time was 79 ms and then it took 1.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 25% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

think.design performance score

14

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.6 s

31/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value17.3 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value8.2 s

20/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,190 ms

21/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.499

16/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value17.1 s

4/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

think.design

79 ms

think.design

130 ms

jquery.min.js

46 ms

zhb3bja.css

66 ms

vendor.css

79 ms

Our browser made a total of 82 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 76% of them (62 requests) were addressed to the original Think.design, 12% (10 requests) were made to Use.typekit.net and 4% (3 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (329 ms) belongs to the original domain Think.design.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 72.4 kB (2%)

Content Size

3.7 MB

After Optimization

3.6 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Think.design main page is 3.7 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 3.3 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-78%

Potential reduce by 56.9 kB

  • Original 72.6 kB
  • After minification 72.5 kB
  • After compression 15.7 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 56.9 kB or 78% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 1.1 kB

  • Original 3.3 MB
  • After minification 3.3 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Think images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-4%

Potential reduce by 7.3 kB

  • Original 180.9 kB
  • After minification 180.9 kB
  • After compression 173.6 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-5%

Potential reduce by 7.1 kB

  • Original 130.5 kB
  • After minification 130.5 kB
  • After compression 123.4 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Think.design has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 19 (27%)

Requests Now

70

After Optimization

51

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 70 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Think. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 12 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

think.design

think.design

79 ms

think.design

think.design

130 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

46 ms

zhb3bja.css

zhb3bja.css

66 ms

vendor.css

vendor.css

79 ms

styles.css

styles.css

138 ms

shell.js

shell.js

39 ms

js

js

59 ms

js

js

120 ms

vendor.js

vendor.js

215 ms

core-api.js

core-api.js

121 ms

6546444.js

6546444.js

57 ms

p.css

p.css

28 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

214 ms

logo.svg

logo.svg

204 ms

logo2.svg

logo2.svg

186 ms

home-banner-latest.jpg

home-banner-latest.jpg

206 ms

service-design-banner-min.jpg

service-design-banner-min.jpg

210 ms

Data-Design.jpg

Data-Design.jpg

207 ms

user-research-banner-min.jpg

user-research-banner-min.jpg

212 ms

UI-UX-Design.jpg

UI-UX-Design.jpg

210 ms

narrow.svg

narrow.svg

207 ms

UIUX.jpg

UIUX.jpg

211 ms

nextss.png

nextss.png

209 ms

Enterprise.jpg

Enterprise.jpg

217 ms

Health.jpg

Health.jpg

213 ms

Research.jpg

Research.jpg

216 ms

BFSI.jpg

BFSI.jpg

212 ms

Data-Design.jpg

Data-Design.jpg

233 ms

Entertainment.jpg

Entertainment.jpg

214 ms

News.jpg

News.jpg

213 ms

Education.jpg

Education.jpg

234 ms

Transforming-Banking-scaled-435x274.jpg

Transforming-Banking-scaled-435x274.jpg

251 ms

MPW-news-435x274.jpg

MPW-news-435x274.jpg

250 ms

News-Artwork_Forecast-435x274.png

News-Artwork_Forecast-435x274.png

257 ms

AFAL-435x274.jpg

AFAL-435x274.jpg

250 ms

Hari_Jury-member-435x274.png

Hari_Jury-member-435x274.png

268 ms

NIIT-435x274.png

NIIT-435x274.png

272 ms

Salesken-435x274.png

Salesken-435x274.png

289 ms

thinking.jpg

thinking.jpg

288 ms

Godrej.png

Godrej.png

289 ms

Ge.png

Ge.png

306 ms

Malayala-Manorama.png

Malayala-Manorama.png

307 ms

AT-T.png

AT-T.png

307 ms

SBI.png

SBI.png

327 ms

Zoylo.png

Zoylo.png

328 ms

Airtel.png

Airtel.png

328 ms

Hindustan-Times.png

Hindustan-Times.png

329 ms

Trilogy.png

Trilogy.png

300 ms

Worldpay.png

Worldpay.png

146 ms

d

d

67 ms

d

d

103 ms

d

d

102 ms

d

d

102 ms

d

d

158 ms

d

d

89 ms

d

d

160 ms

d

d

122 ms

d

d

142 ms

d

d

123 ms

Medtronic.png

Medtronic.png

156 ms

app.js

app.js

117 ms

banner.js

banner.js

116 ms

6546444.js

6546444.js

189 ms

collectedforms.js

collectedforms.js

115 ms

Pidilite.png

Pidilite.png

140 ms

2019-indias-best-design-awards.png

2019-indias-best-design-awards.png

140 ms

2019-indias-best-design-awards-1.jpg

2019-indias-best-design-awards-1.jpg

139 ms

2019-cii-design-excellence-awards.png

2019-cii-design-excellence-awards.png

153 ms

2018-good-design-awards.png

2018-good-design-awards.png

153 ms

2018-if-design-award.png

2018-if-design-award.png

153 ms

2018-indias-best-design-awards.png

2018-indias-best-design-awards.png

168 ms

2018-indias-best-design-awards-1.jpg

2018-indias-best-design-awards-1.jpg

153 ms

2017-good-design-award.png

2017-good-design-award.png

152 ms

2017-creativepool-annual.jpg

2017-creativepool-annual.jpg

156 ms

2017-indias-best-design-awards.jpg

2017-indias-best-design-awards.jpg

162 ms

cross-icon.svg

cross-icon.svg

160 ms

facebook-icon.svg

facebook-icon.svg

172 ms

twitter-icon.svg

twitter-icon.svg

169 ms

insta-icon.svg

insta-icon.svg

162 ms

linkedin-icon.svg

linkedin-icon.svg

160 ms

vimeo-icon.svg

vimeo-icon.svg

163 ms

Accessibility Review

think.design accessibility score

87

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best Practices

think.design best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

think.design SEO score

80

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Think.design can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Think.design main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

think.design

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Think. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: