Tools & Wizards About Us
think.studio screenshot

Report Summary

  • 19

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    36% of other websites

  • 79

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 47% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 93

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    83% of websites

think.studio

Think Studio - Creating Better Business

Page Load Speed

6.4 sec in total

First Response

1.4 sec

Resources Loaded

4.7 sec

Page Rendered

385 ms

think.studio screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Think content for United Kingdom. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about think.studio

One Agency, Four Teams. A brand and digital agency that thinks about the bigger picture. We partner with ambitious companies to design better businesses.

Visit think.studio

Key Findings

We analyzed Think.studio page load time and found that the first response time was 1.4 sec and then it took 5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 75% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

think.studio performance score

19

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.9 s

26/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value8.8 s

1/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value11.1 s

6/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value3,290 ms

2/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.071

96/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value17.3 s

4/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

think.studio

1384 ms

autoptimize_single_9248a3afba5d3537f309e10c5e9af9e0.js

159 ms

autoptimize_single_c197b106b056cb97ffeba892c1ca2b11.js

249 ms

autoptimize_single_380bab78cf358e9429cc478dee3067e4.js

328 ms

autoptimize_single_8583870cc7154e743f0e4278a7fba1cc.js

330 ms

Our browser made a total of 43 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 93% of them (40 requests) were addressed to the original Think.studio, 2% (1 request) were made to Google.com and 2% (1 request) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.4 sec) belongs to the original domain Think.studio.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 1.1 MB (9%)

Content Size

12.4 MB

After Optimization

11.2 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript

In fact, the total size of Think.studio main page is 12.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 11.6 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-85%

Potential reduce by 319.3 kB

  • Original 376.3 kB
  • After minification 376.2 kB
  • After compression 57.0 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 319.3 kB or 85% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-5%

Potential reduce by 631.0 kB

  • Original 11.6 MB
  • After minification 11.0 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Think images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-45%

Potential reduce by 185.6 kB

  • Original 410.2 kB
  • After minification 410.2 kB
  • After compression 224.7 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 185.6 kB or 45% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 19 (49%)

Requests Now

39

After Optimization

20

  • Images
  • JavaScript

The browser has sent 39 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Think. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 20 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

think.studio

think.studio

1384 ms

autoptimize_single_9248a3afba5d3537f309e10c5e9af9e0.js

autoptimize_single_9248a3afba5d3537f309e10c5e9af9e0.js

159 ms

autoptimize_single_c197b106b056cb97ffeba892c1ca2b11.js

autoptimize_single_c197b106b056cb97ffeba892c1ca2b11.js

249 ms

autoptimize_single_380bab78cf358e9429cc478dee3067e4.js

autoptimize_single_380bab78cf358e9429cc478dee3067e4.js

328 ms

autoptimize_single_8583870cc7154e743f0e4278a7fba1cc.js

autoptimize_single_8583870cc7154e743f0e4278a7fba1cc.js

330 ms

autoptimize_single_b727de110b4a6d72f42d76d73a4c843a.js

autoptimize_single_b727de110b4a6d72f42d76d73a4c843a.js

494 ms

autoptimize_single_6393a492233f25a41014eef1199debac.js

autoptimize_single_6393a492233f25a41014eef1199debac.js

414 ms

autoptimize_single_e6a21782fbbe0fe1bcb74449043dc167.js

autoptimize_single_e6a21782fbbe0fe1bcb74449043dc167.js

325 ms

wpforms-user-journey.min.js

wpforms-user-journey.min.js

325 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

563 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

404 ms

jquery.validate.min.js

jquery.validate.min.js

405 ms

jquery.inputmask.min.js

jquery.inputmask.min.js

581 ms

mailcheck.min.js

mailcheck.min.js

486 ms

punycode.min.js

punycode.min.js

485 ms

utils.min.js

utils.min.js

493 ms

wpforms.min.js

wpforms.min.js

590 ms

wpforms-modern.min.js

wpforms-modern.min.js

590 ms

api.js

api.js

151 ms

MicrosoftTeams-image-36.jpg

MicrosoftTeams-image-36.jpg

975 ms

haki-logo-small.svg

haki-logo-small.svg

591 ms

hilton-case.jpg

hilton-case.jpg

1042 ms

hilton_logo.svg

hilton_logo.svg

646 ms

MicrosoftTeams-image-38.jpg

MicrosoftTeams-image-38.jpg

729 ms

newsmast-logo-small.svg

newsmast-logo-small.svg

648 ms

brightnewthings.jpg

brightnewthings.jpg

1316 ms

haki.jpg

haki.jpg

1130 ms

health.jpg

health.jpg

1211 ms

wonder.png

wonder.png

813 ms

lyfe.jpg

lyfe.jpg

975 ms

finance.jpg

finance.jpg

1136 ms

technology.jpg

technology.jpg

1061 ms

cr_8.png

cr_8.png

1122 ms

arrow-green-right.4ef3f6.svg

arrow-green-right.4ef3f6.svg

1144 ms

submit-spin.svg

submit-spin.svg

1202 ms

logo_footer_yellow.svg

logo_footer_yellow.svg

1211 ms

Think-logo-grey.svg

Think-logo-grey.svg

1215 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

206 ms

hotjar-2696844.js

hotjar-2696844.js

230 ms

logo_partner_connect.svg

logo_partner_connect.svg

1172 ms

Inter-Regular.4d7d40.woff

Inter-Regular.4d7d40.woff

1136 ms

Inter-SemiBold.8709b7.woff

Inter-SemiBold.8709b7.woff

1076 ms

Inter-Bold.b921a9.woff

Inter-Bold.b921a9.woff

997 ms

Accessibility Review

think.studio accessibility score

79

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best Practices

think.studio best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

think.studio SEO score

93

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Think.studio can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Think.studio main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

think.studio

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Think. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: