3.4 sec in total
209 ms
2.9 sec
335 ms
Visit thinkgr.com now to see the best up-to-date Think GR content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about thinkgr.com
Think Global Recruitment has assisted accountancy & finance professionals to move around the globe since 2000.
Visit thinkgr.comWe analyzed Thinkgr.com page load time and found that the first response time was 209 ms and then it took 3.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.
thinkgr.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.9 s
11/100
10%
Value9.6 s
0/100
25%
Value11.3 s
5/100
10%
Value1,960 ms
8/100
30%
Value0.039
100/100
15%
Value22.1 s
1/100
10%
209 ms
1174 ms
60 ms
107 ms
68 ms
Our browser made a total of 92 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 61% of them (56 requests) were addressed to the original Thinkgr.com, 8% (7 requests) were made to Use.typekit.net and 8% (7 requests) were made to Cdnjs.cloudflare.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.2 sec) belongs to the original domain Thinkgr.com.
Page size can be reduced by 239.2 kB (21%)
1.1 MB
902.9 kB
In fact, the total size of Thinkgr.com main page is 1.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 693.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 169.7 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 169.7 kB or 83% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 16 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Think GR images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 66.4 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 3.0 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Thinkgr.com has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 73 (87%)
84
11
The browser has sent 84 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Think GR. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 51 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 16 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
thinkgr.com
209 ms
www.thinkgr.com
1174 ms
jquery-3.1.1.min.js
60 ms
eul7cgm.js
107 ms
sweetalert.css
68 ms
sweetalert.min.js
69 ms
style.min.css
113 ms
theme.min.css
224 ms
responsive.css
270 ms
slick.css
69 ms
select2.min.css
69 ms
animate.min.css
77 ms
public.css
275 ms
jquery.min.js
289 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
289 ms
jquery.validate.min.js
298 ms
ajax-auth-script.js
324 ms
ajax-register-script.js
361 ms
ajax-manualjob-script.js
370 ms
ajax-user-update-script.js
385 ms
operations-candidate.js
387 ms
slick.min.js
83 ms
select2.min.js
67 ms
wow.min.js
77 ms
jquery.matchHeight-min.js
81 ms
js
120 ms
smush-lazy-load-native.min.js
397 ms
vc-loader.min.js
70 ms
gravity-forms-theme-reset.min.css
434 ms
gravity-forms-theme-foundation.min.css
491 ms
gravity-forms-theme-framework.min.css
493 ms
formreset.min.css
499 ms
formsmain.min.css
502 ms
readyclass.min.css
518 ms
browsers.min.css
555 ms
wphb-lazy-load.min.js
574 ms
theme.min.js
584 ms
scripts.js
583 ms
map.js
594 ms
wp-polyfill-inert.min.js
614 ms
regenerator-runtime.min.js
647 ms
wp-polyfill.min.js
675 ms
dom-ready.min.js
684 ms
hooks.min.js
683 ms
i18n.min.js
698 ms
a11y.min.js
709 ms
jquery.json.min.js
737 ms
gravityforms.min.js
771 ms
placeholders.jquery.min.js
778 ms
addthis_widget.js
433 ms
in.js
70 ms
platform.js
70 ms
all.js
70 ms
utils.min.js
781 ms
gtm.js
57 ms
vendor-theme.min.js
687 ms
scripts-theme.min.js
580 ms
akismet-frontend.js
567 ms
conditional_logic.min.js
596 ms
moxie.min.js
595 ms
plupload.min.js
593 ms
analytics.js
38 ms
callback.png
633 ms
submit.png
633 ms
down-arrow-gold.png
615 ms
slider-bg.jpg
616 ms
fbevents.js
7 ms
top-line.png
603 ms
bottom-line.png
603 ms
awards-bg.jpg
603 ms
newsletter-bg.jpg
603 ms
collect
45 ms
collect
9 ms
logo.png
538 ms
smush-lazyloader-1.gif
811 ms
all.js
109 ms
sdk.js
110 ms
css2
273 ms
polyfills-legacy-f1b8a360.js
177 ms
d
184 ms
d
184 ms
d
220 ms
d
192 ms
d
192 ms
d
220 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_0
58 ms
prev-arrow.png
149 ms
next-arrow.png
148 ms
Copy-of-Abigail-Stevens-400-%C3%97-80-px-300x60.jpg
132 ms
iframe
134 ms
p.gif
28 ms
m=base
19 ms
thinkgr.com accessibility score
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
ARIA input fields do not have accessible names
ARIA toggle fields do not have accessible names
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
thinkgr.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
thinkgr.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Thinkgr.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Thinkgr.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
thinkgr.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Think GR. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: