Report Summary

  • 30

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    50% of other websites

  • 84

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 56% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 74

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    31% of websites

thinkingsystems.com

Thinking Systems PACS Cloud: Healthcare’s Cloud PACS System

Page Load Speed

2.5 sec in total

First Response

70 ms

Resources Loaded

1.9 sec

Page Rendered

514 ms

thinkingsystems.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to thinkingsystems.com homepage info - get ready to check Thinking Systems best content right away, or after learning these important things about thinkingsystems.com

Thinking Systems PACSCloud offers the most user-friendly medical imaging workflows for nuclear medicine, molecular imaging, oncology, cardiology, and radiology PACS. Click here to see why leading heal...

Visit thinkingsystems.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Thinkingsystems.com page load time and found that the first response time was 70 ms and then it took 2.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

thinkingsystems.com performance score

30

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.3 s

41/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value13.6 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value9.2 s

13/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value480 ms

60/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.342

33/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value12.6 s

14/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

thinkingsystems.com

70 ms

thinkingsystems.com

838 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

36 ms

style.min.css

102 ms

frontend.css

58 ms

Our browser made a total of 113 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 79% of them (89 requests) were addressed to the original Thinkingsystems.com, 16% (18 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 4% (4 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (838 ms) belongs to the original domain Thinkingsystems.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 185.4 kB (9%)

Content Size

2.1 MB

After Optimization

2.0 MB

In fact, the total size of Thinkingsystems.com main page is 2.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 2.0 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 146.1 kB

  • Original 175.2 kB
  • After minification 173.2 kB
  • After compression 29.1 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 146.1 kB or 83% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 39.3 kB

  • Original 2.0 MB
  • After minification 1.9 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Thinking Systems images are well optimized though.

CSS Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 12.6 kB
  • After minification 12.6 kB
  • After compression 12.6 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Thinkingsystems.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 56 (64%)

Requests Now

88

After Optimization

32

The browser has sent 88 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Thinking Systems. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 31 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 27 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

thinkingsystems.com accessibility score

84

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

ARIA input fields do not have accessible names

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

High

Some elements have a [tabindex] value greater than 0

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

thinkingsystems.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

thinkingsystems.com SEO score

74

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

High

Page is blocked from indexing

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Thinkingsystems.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Thinkingsystems.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Thinking Systems. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: