Tools & Wizards About Us
thinkipm.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 71

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    81% of other websites

  • 71

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 36% of websites

  • 50

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    19% of websites

  • 99

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    93% of websites

thinkipm.com

IP Media - Public Relations, Marketing and Advertising for the Public Safety Market

Page Load Speed

1.8 sec in total

First Response

183 ms

Resources Loaded

1.5 sec

Page Rendered

165 ms

thinkipm.com screenshot

About Website

Visit thinkipm.com now to see the best up-to-date Think IP M content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about thinkipm.com

law enforcement marketing. law enforcement advertising law enforcement consulting, tactical and law enforcement marketing, police marketing, police public relations, fire marketing, EMS marketing, pub...

Visit thinkipm.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Thinkipm.com page load time and found that the first response time was 183 ms and then it took 1.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 35% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

thinkipm.com performance score

71

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.4 s

70/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value11.0 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value2.8 s

96/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value100 ms

98/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.007

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value2.6 s

98/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

thinkipm.com

183 ms

thinkipm.com

257 ms

style.css

65 ms

css

23 ms

css

40 ms

Our browser made a total of 47 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 85% of them (40 requests) were addressed to the original Thinkipm.com, 11% (5 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 4% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (742 ms) belongs to the original domain Thinkipm.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 5.4 MB (89%)

Content Size

6.1 MB

After Optimization

699.7 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Thinkipm.com main page is 6.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 6.0 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-75%

Potential reduce by 8.9 kB

  • Original 12.0 kB
  • After minification 10.6 kB
  • After compression 3.0 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 1.4 kB, which is 11% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 8.9 kB or 75% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-89%

Potential reduce by 5.4 MB

  • Original 6.0 MB
  • After minification 646.6 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Think IP M needs image optimization as it can save up to 5.4 MB or 89% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-27%

Potential reduce by 17.5 kB

  • Original 64.2 kB
  • After minification 61.5 kB
  • After compression 46.8 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 17.5 kB or 27% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-41%

Potential reduce by 2.3 kB

  • Original 5.6 kB
  • After minification 5.6 kB
  • After compression 3.3 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Thinkipm.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 2.3 kB or 41% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 3 (8%)

Requests Now

38

After Optimization

35

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 38 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Think IP M. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 4 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

thinkipm.com

thinkipm.com

183 ms

thinkipm.com

thinkipm.com

257 ms

style.css

style.css

65 ms

css

css

23 ms

css

css

40 ms

jquery-1.8.0.min.js

jquery-1.8.0.min.js

192 ms

jquery.touchwipe.1.1.1.js

jquery.touchwipe.1.1.1.js

181 ms

jquery.carouFredSel-5.5.0-packed.js

jquery.carouFredSel-5.5.0-packed.js

243 ms

functions.js

functions.js

200 ms

body.png

body.png

66 ms

header.png

header.png

64 ms

header-shell.png

header-shell.png

425 ms

logo.png

logo.png

67 ms

slider-h3-border.png

slider-h3-border.png

64 ms

green-btn.png

green-btn.png

183 ms

front-img.png

front-img.png

473 ms

img-mid.png

img-mid.png

300 ms

img-back.png

img-back.png

367 ms

front-img2.png

front-img2.png

471 ms

img-mid2.png

img-mid2.png

482 ms

img-back2.png

img-back2.png

422 ms

front-img3.png

front-img3.png

489 ms

img-mid3.png

img-mid3.png

488 ms

img-back3.png

img-back3.png

551 ms

front-img4.png

front-img4.png

593 ms

img-mid4.png

img-mid4.png

554 ms

img-back4.png

img-back4.png

602 ms

direction-nav.png

direction-nav.png

550 ms

main.png

main.png

551 ms

section.png

section.png

618 ms

col-img1.png

col-img1.png

617 ms

green-arr.png

green-arr.png

613 ms

col-img2.png

col-img2.png

618 ms

col-img3.png

col-img3.png

656 ms

clientsone.png

clientsone.png

664 ms

socials-pattern.png

socials-pattern.png

679 ms

socials.png

socials.png

685 ms

footer.png

footer.png

680 ms

footer-shell.png

footer-shell.png

679 ms

footer-cols.png

footer-cols.png

721 ms

pagination.png

pagination.png

724 ms

SLXHc1jY5nQ8FUUGbg.ttf

SLXHc1jY5nQ8FUUGbg.ttf

34 ms

ptc75f-webfont.woff

ptc75f-webfont.woff

742 ms

z7NOdRfiaC4Vd8hhoPzfb5vBTP2D6pumR_0.ttf

z7NOdRfiaC4Vd8hhoPzfb5vBTP2D6pumR_0.ttf

90 ms

z7NOdRfiaC4Vd8hhoPzfb5vBTP1v7ZumR_0.ttf

z7NOdRfiaC4Vd8hhoPzfb5vBTP1v7ZumR_0.ttf

68 ms

z7NOdRfiaC4Vd8hhoPzfb5vBTP1d7ZumR_0.ttf

z7NOdRfiaC4Vd8hhoPzfb5vBTP1d7ZumR_0.ttf

68 ms

z7NOdRfiaC4Vd8hhoPzfb5vBTP0D7ZumR_0.ttf

z7NOdRfiaC4Vd8hhoPzfb5vBTP0D7ZumR_0.ttf

66 ms

Accessibility Review

thinkipm.com accessibility score

71

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

thinkipm.com best practices score

50

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools

SEO Factors

thinkipm.com SEO score

99

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Thinkipm.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Thinkipm.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

thinkipm.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Think IP M. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: