2.2 sec in total
114 ms
1.5 sec
588 ms
Click here to check amazing Thomasdigital content for India. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about thomasdigital.com
Thomas Digital is a web design company located in San Francisco, California. We are one of the top Bay Area web design agencies. Free Custom Mockup!
Visit thomasdigital.comWe analyzed Thomasdigital.com page load time and found that the first response time was 114 ms and then it took 2.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 40% of websites can load faster.
thomasdigital.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.1 s
79/100
10%
Value15.5 s
0/100
25%
Value7.1 s
32/100
10%
Value1,910 ms
8/100
30%
Value0.01
100/100
15%
Value14.9 s
8/100
10%
114 ms
356 ms
158 ms
199 ms
156 ms
Our browser made a total of 34 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 68% of them (23 requests) were addressed to the original Thomasdigital.com, 9% (3 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com and 6% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (825 ms) relates to the external source App.simplebotinstall.com.
Page size can be reduced by 97.0 kB (15%)
652.2 kB
555.1 kB
In fact, the total size of Thomasdigital.com main page is 652.2 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 462.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 93.3 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 93.3 kB or 83% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 3.8 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 0 B
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Thomasdigital.com has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 25 (78%)
32
7
The browser has sent 32 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Thomasdigital. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 19 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
thomasdigital.com
114 ms
thomasdigital.com
356 ms
js
158 ms
gtm.js
199 ms
optimize.js
156 ms
analytics.js
41 ms
js
206 ms
autoptimize_e1944f96babe1148af1acb55a69805d0.css
56 ms
jquery.min.js
79 ms
chat_plugin.js
825 ms
wp-polyfill-inert.min.js
193 ms
regenerator-runtime.min.js
152 ms
wp-polyfill.min.js
127 ms
dom-ready.min.js
150 ms
hooks.min.js
151 ms
i18n.min.js
152 ms
a11y.min.js
187 ms
autoptimize_19e4205fd1de159bc95593ef2b893d13.js
189 ms
collect
145 ms
hotjar-872722.js
170 ms
logo.svg
75 ms
play-btn-1.svg
74 ms
r-arrow.svg
73 ms
r-arrow-1.svg
206 ms
ls-right.svg
73 ms
q1.svg
88 ms
star-5.svg
230 ms
logo-float.svg
91 ms
soc1.svg
109 ms
soc3.svg
88 ms
soc2.svg
106 ms
modules.e4b2dc39f985f11fb1e4.js
19 ms
widget.js
186 ms
23425478.js
74 ms
thomasdigital.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
thomasdigital.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
thomasdigital.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Thomasdigital.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Thomasdigital.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
thomasdigital.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Thomasdigital. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: