5.1 sec in total
229 ms
4.5 sec
404 ms
Click here to check amazing Thomas Drafting content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about thomasdrafting.ca
Architectural drafting & design services for architects, engineers, designers, homeowners and more. Specializing in residential and commercial projects.
Visit thomasdrafting.caWe analyzed Thomasdrafting.ca page load time and found that the first response time was 229 ms and then it took 4.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.
thomasdrafting.ca performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value5.9 s
4/100
10%
Value14.8 s
0/100
25%
Value14.9 s
1/100
10%
Value1,710 ms
11/100
30%
Value0.021
100/100
15%
Value14.8 s
8/100
10%
229 ms
678 ms
118 ms
155 ms
166 ms
Our browser made a total of 99 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 76% of them (75 requests) were addressed to the original Thomasdrafting.ca, 13% (13 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 5% (5 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.8 sec) belongs to the original domain Thomasdrafting.ca.
Page size can be reduced by 125.1 kB (39%)
317.5 kB
192.4 kB
In fact, the total size of Thomasdrafting.ca main page is 317.5 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 151.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 125.0 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 125.0 kB or 83% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 19 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Thomas Drafting images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 50 B
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Number of requests can be reduced by 62 (82%)
76
14
The browser has sent 76 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Thomas Drafting. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 42 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 22 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
thomasdrafting.ca
229 ms
www.thomasdrafting.ca
678 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
118 ms
jquery.min.js
155 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
166 ms
popper.min.js
1780 ms
fotorama.js
320 ms
jquery.magnific-popup.min.js
239 ms
jquery.sticky.js
241 ms
jquery.inview.min.js
242 ms
jquery.bxslider.min.js
242 ms
jquery.mixitup.min.js
318 ms
threesixty.js
318 ms
custom.js
321 ms
js
61 ms
js
106 ms
rbtools.min.js
461 ms
rs6.min.js
527 ms
child-theme.js
394 ms
front-end--inputmask.min.js
393 ms
front-end--helptext.min.js
400 ms
underscore.min.js
436 ms
backbone.min.js
436 ms
front-end-deps.js
476 ms
front-end.js
572 ms
jquery.fitvids.js
494 ms
jquery.bxslider.min.js
505 ms
jquery.cookie.min.js
547 ms
jquery.raty.min.js
570 ms
webpack-pro.runtime.min.js
576 ms
webpack.runtime.min.js
595 ms
frontend-modules.min.js
623 ms
regenerator-runtime.min.js
629 ms
wp-polyfill.min.js
642 ms
hooks.min.js
649 ms
i18n.min.js
661 ms
frontend.min.js
698 ms
waypoints.min.js
698 ms
core.min.js
712 ms
frontend.min.js
717 ms
elements-handlers.min.js
661 ms
icon-social-bbb.png
592 ms
jquery.bxslider.css
547 ms
css
94 ms
testimonials-widget.css
552 ms
testimonials-widget-premium.css
566 ms
testimonials-widget-premium-form.css
580 ms
js
96 ms
analytics.js
69 ms
js
171 ms
js
125 ms
style.min.css
566 ms
magnific-popup.css
528 ms
fotorama.css
591 ms
child-theme.css
566 ms
threesixty.css
620 ms
collect
52 ms
collect
84 ms
elementor-icons.min.css
555 ms
frontend-lite.min.css
564 ms
post-7904.css
622 ms
collect
54 ms
frontend-lite.min.css
592 ms
global.css
579 ms
post-9.css
570 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
651 ms
opensans-regular-webfont.woff
556 ms
opensans-bold-webfont.woff
544 ms
montserrat-regular-webfont.woff
589 ms
montserrat-semibold-webfont.woff
578 ms
opensans-italic-webfont.woff
555 ms
opensans-bolditalic-webfont.woff
552 ms
logo.png
551 ms
nav-border.png
533 ms
dummy.png
504 ms
bg-services1.jpg
622 ms
bg-services2.jpg
605 ms
triangle.png
535 ms
css
15 ms
widget-icon-list.min.css
568 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCvr73w5aX8.ttf
21 ms
dashicons.min.css
547 ms
display-structure.css
590 ms
jBox.css
580 ms
rs6.css
586 ms
logo2.png
448 ms
icon-social-bbb2.png
449 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9.ttf
4 ms
KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf
16 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmSU5fBBc9.ttf
22 ms
KFOkCnqEu92Fr1MmgVxIIzc.ttf
23 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfBBc9.ttf
35 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmYUtfBBc9.ttf
34 ms
KFOkCnqEu92Fr1Mu51xIIzc.ttf
36 ms
KFOjCnqEu92Fr1Mu51S7ACc6CsE.ttf
22 ms
KFOjCnqEu92Fr1Mu51TjASc6CsE.ttf
36 ms
KFOiCnqEu92Fr1Mu51QrEzAdKg.ttf
36 ms
KFOjCnqEu92Fr1Mu51TzBic6CsE.ttf
37 ms
KFOjCnqEu92Fr1Mu51TLBCc6CsE.ttf
37 ms
thomasdrafting.ca accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
thomasdrafting.ca best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
thomasdrafting.ca SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Thomasdrafting.ca can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Thomasdrafting.ca main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
thomasdrafting.ca
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Thomas Drafting. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: