3.9 sec in total
488 ms
3.2 sec
206 ms
Welcome to thomaseggar.com homepage info - get ready to check Thomaseggar best content for United Kingdom right away, or after learning these important things about thomaseggar.com
If you or your business need legal advice, we’re here. Our solicitors and advisers will listen and give you all the support you need.
Visit thomaseggar.comWe analyzed Thomaseggar.com page load time and found that the first response time was 488 ms and then it took 3.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.
thomaseggar.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.3 s
75/100
10%
Value3.1 s
74/100
25%
Value4.6 s
71/100
10%
Value1,240 ms
19/100
30%
Value0.025
100/100
15%
Value11.4 s
19/100
10%
488 ms
1361 ms
7 ms
203 ms
304 ms
Our browser made a total of 55 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 69% of them (38 requests) were addressed to the original Thomaseggar.com, 7% (4 requests) were made to Google.com and 4% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.4 sec) belongs to the original domain Thomaseggar.com.
Page size can be reduced by 514.7 kB (56%)
926.3 kB
411.6 kB
In fact, the total size of Thomaseggar.com main page is 926.3 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 576.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 36.9 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 36.9 kB or 74% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 27.1 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Thomaseggar needs image optimization as it can save up to 27.1 kB or 12% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 389.0 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 389.0 kB or 68% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 61.7 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Thomaseggar.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 61.7 kB or 82% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 28 (60%)
47
19
The browser has sent 47 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Thomaseggar. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 17 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 5 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
thomaseggar.com
488 ms
www.thomaseggar.com
1361 ms
jquery.min.js
7 ms
editor.css
203 ms
normalize.css
304 ms
style.css
488 ms
Telerik.Web.UI.WebResource.axd
235 ms
WebResource.axd
203 ms
Telerik.Web.UI.WebResource.axd
829 ms
jquery.innerfade.js
126 ms
jquery.tools.min.js
7 ms
appius.twitmogrifier.js
166 ms
scripts.js
205 ms
jquery.cookiebar.js
222 ms
UK_leading_firm_2015.jpg
477 ms
wrapper-back.png
105 ms
TEIM-logo.png
118 ms
play-button-white.png
133 ms
refreshing.png
340 ms
stages-of-life.jpg
151 ms
8C42DEA88520.png
224 ms
merger-completion645B6BB6274F7EB8855B453F.jpg
609 ms
twitter-logo.jpg
338 ms
footer-web-address.png
338 ms
gtm.js
45 ms
analytics.js
5 ms
js
37 ms
keen.min.js
73 ms
tracker-1.3.0.min.js
72 ms
12564.png
53 ms
collect
12 ms
collect
57 ms
p001-v1.stats-limiter-api.agoraa.co.uk
839 ms
jsapi
40 ms
14 ms
in.php
163 ms
ui+en,table+en.css
5 ms
format+en,default+en,ui+en,table+en,corechart+en.I.js
26 ms
telephone-icon.png
144 ms
nav-bk.gif
145 ms
btn-search.png
150 ms
dots.png
136 ms
btn-arrow.png
149 ms
960-line.gif
191 ms
signupForm-btn.jpg
181 ms
linkedin-icon.png
170 ms
twitter-icon.png
171 ms
facebook-icon.png
169 ms
rss-icon.png
186 ms
contact-icon.png
270 ms
64a6ccf1-7001-4e8f-b3cb-7ff0d7610141.woff
298 ms
c769debe-a3c1-4f16-af1d-a32edef04847.woff
277 ms
e989b9d0-5de6-43ce-b474-1d6182f206cb.woff
374 ms
1e04760e-164e-4f1c-8c2c-ea48307124a4.woff
298 ms
30e369ef-7509-4924-be61-8ee7fbcacf3f.woff
426 ms
thomaseggar.com accessibility score
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
button, link, and menuitem elements do not have accessible names.
thomaseggar.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
thomaseggar.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Thomaseggar.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Thomaseggar.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
thomaseggar.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Thomaseggar. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: