15.8 sec in total
1 sec
5.7 sec
9.1 sec
Welcome to thomashawk.com homepage info - get ready to check Thomas Hawk best content for United States right away, or after learning these important things about thomashawk.com
Visit thomashawk.comWe analyzed Thomashawk.com page load time and found that the first response time was 1 sec and then it took 14.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 90% of websites can load faster. This domain responded with an error, which can significantly jeopardize Thomashawk.com rating and web reputation
thomashawk.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.4 s
70/100
10%
Value3.1 s
74/100
25%
Value2.6 s
97/100
10%
Value200 ms
90/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value3.1 s
95/100
10%
1042 ms
30 ms
309 ms
130 ms
132 ms
Our browser made a total of 99 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 2% of them (2 requests) were addressed to the original Thomashawk.com, 35% (35 requests) were made to Apis.google.com and 13% (13 requests) were made to Thomashawk.wpengine.netdna-cdn.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.7 sec) relates to the external source Farm1.staticflickr.com.
Page size can be reduced by 685.5 kB (50%)
1.4 MB
682.4 kB
In fact, the total size of Thomashawk.com main page is 1.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 85% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Javascripts take 577.1 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 96.4 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 96.4 kB or 74% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 2 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Thomas Hawk images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 381.3 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 381.3 kB or 66% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 207.8 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Thomashawk.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 207.8 kB or 83% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 55 (57%)
96
41
The browser has sent 96 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Thomas Hawk. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 51 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 6 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
thomashawk.com
1042 ms
style.css
30 ms
thomashawk.css
309 ms
jquery.js
130 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
132 ms
external-tracking.min.js
119 ms
buttons.js
307 ms
javascript-flickr-badge.min.js
131 ms
158
392 ms
client-code.js
391 ms
show_ads.js
113 ms
plugin.css
25 ms
core.min.js
127 ms
widget.min.js
128 ms
tabs.min.js
135 ms
plusone.js
389 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
221 ms
analytics.js
27 ms
border_h.png
25 ms
19021004924_66ec79fbe8_z.jpg
1660 ms
gplus-64.png
1328 ms
thomashawk.jpg
633 ms
simple-smile.png
472 ms
19758153198_72ef7a7d43.jpg
1322 ms
19655058401_bcc87c6bc1_z.jpg
1664 ms
collect
509 ms
rss.png
508 ms
jcX02RWJvb4
1317 ms
ca-pub-4821663437248389.js
1153 ms
zrt_lookup.html
754 ms
show_ads_impl.js
422 ms
photos_public.gne
910 ms
css
594 ms
ads
452 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_0
169 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_1
152 ms
fastbutton
152 ms
fastbutton
980 ms
fastbutton
972 ms
fastbutton
982 ms
fastbutton
984 ms
fastbutton
983 ms
fastbutton
978 ms
fastbutton
1332 ms
fastbutton
1333 ms
fastbutton
1391 ms
www-embed-player-vfltSWGRn.css
934 ms
www-embed-player.js
979 ms
base.js
1306 ms
osd.js
911 ms
25058093735_c36862d88b_s.jpg
914 ms
24690439049_82ac1be62f_s.jpg
881 ms
25031708056_876396dcd1_s.jpg
881 ms
24964749301_3e17509c6e_s.jpg
882 ms
25044179805_e4ef66743c_s.jpg
882 ms
24926128462_f97abec078_s.jpg
881 ms
24413549214_02040efe92_s.jpg
943 ms
25044173555_46bdbc770c_s.jpg
941 ms
24748632730_5efc49f261_s.jpg
1108 ms
css
871 ms
m_js_controller.js
1096 ms
abg.js
1140 ms
rs=AGLTcCPCJXWDMjELYySRBGVYpPEu9Hh-hA
909 ms
1f609.png
868 ms
getAllAppDefault.esi
462 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_0
371 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_1
359 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_0
358 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_1
345 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_0
340 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_1
340 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_0
328 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_1
303 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_0
301 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_1
296 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_0
277 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_1
268 ms
favicon
230 ms
googlelogo_color_112x36dp.png
228 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_0
172 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_1
155 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_0
137 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_1
135 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_0
108 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_1
96 ms
postmessageRelay
110 ms
getSegment.php
157 ms
checkOAuth.esi
13 ms
api.js
125 ms
core:rpc:shindig.random:shindig.sha1.js
154 ms
2536007149-postmessagerelay.js
9 ms
xZQOmYg4x3YaWkTJi1kErvesZW2xOQ-xsNqO47m55DA.woff
197 ms
t.dhj
87 ms
AUrdvhejKSJD2XN0WEoLkNJn8VW-ISfFFTHwdQR0Ws4.js
74 ms
ad_status.js
63 ms
x_button_blue2.png
41 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_0
17 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_1
17 ms
s
15 ms
thomashawk.com accessibility score
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
button, link, and menuitem elements do not have accessible names.
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Some elements have a [tabindex] value greater than 0
thomashawk.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
thomashawk.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Thomashawk.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Thomashawk.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
thomashawk.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Thomas Hawk. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: