9.1 sec in total
1.1 sec
7.2 sec
840 ms
Visit thomasmathew.net now to see the best up-to-date Thomasmathew content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about thomasmathew.net
I am a freelance UI/UX Designer and Social Media Manger having expertise as Graphic Designer, WordPress Web Designer, SEO and Digital Marketing Expert who handles multiple projects from USA, India, Qa...
Visit thomasmathew.netWe analyzed Thomasmathew.net page load time and found that the first response time was 1.1 sec and then it took 8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 85% of websites can load faster.
thomasmathew.net performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value5.9 s
4/100
10%
Value9.6 s
0/100
25%
Value10.5 s
7/100
10%
Value420 ms
65/100
30%
Value0.026
100/100
15%
Value11.7 s
17/100
10%
1097 ms
206 ms
412 ms
610 ms
610 ms
Our browser made a total of 97 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 88% of them (85 requests) were addressed to the original Thomasmathew.net, 4% (4 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 2% (2 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.4 sec) belongs to the original domain Thomasmathew.net.
Page size can be reduced by 271.8 kB (10%)
2.7 MB
2.4 MB
In fact, the total size of Thomasmathew.net main page is 2.7 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 2.1 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 148.7 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 148.7 kB or 84% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 107.1 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Thomasmathew images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 7.4 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 8.6 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Thomasmathew.net has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 64 (78%)
82
18
The browser has sent 82 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Thomasmathew. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 30 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 31 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
thomasmathew.net
1097 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
206 ms
style.min.css
412 ms
classic-themes.min.css
610 ms
cursor.css
610 ms
chaty-front.min.css
610 ms
page-visit-counter-public.css
617 ms
font-awesome.min.css
619 ms
thepostgrid.min.css
827 ms
plugins.css
811 ms
cdxn-ig.min.css
811 ms
header-footer-elementor.css
813 ms
elementor-icons.min.css
820 ms
frontend-legacy.min.css
821 ms
frontend.min.css
1218 ms
post-99.css
1016 ms
global.css
1016 ms
post-913.css
1028 ms
fluent-forms-elementor-widget.css
1037 ms
frontend.css
1039 ms
post-5742.css
1222 ms
post-5759.css
1222 ms
style.css
1231 ms
dashicons.min.css
1445 ms
style.css
1454 ms
general.min.css
1418 ms
css
34 ms
fontawesome.min.css
1419 ms
brands.min.css
1422 ms
solid.min.css
1434 ms
regular.min.css
1619 ms
jquery.min.js
1826 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
1626 ms
cht-front-script.min.js
1637 ms
page-visit-counter-public.js
1645 ms
js
90 ms
animations.min.css
1652 ms
app.js
1818 ms
typed.js
1953 ms
typed.fe.js
1764 ms
yydev-back-to-top.js
1556 ms
priority-menu.js
1361 ms
touch-keyboard-navigation.js
1459 ms
general.min.js
1460 ms
hoverIntent.min.js
1453 ms
maxmegamenu.js
1449 ms
frontend.js
1260 ms
webpack.runtime.min.js
1293 ms
frontend-modules.min.js
1453 ms
waypoints.min.js
1446 ms
core.min.js
1446 ms
swiper.min.js
1435 ms
share-link.min.js
1254 ms
dialog.min.js
1264 ms
frontend.min.js
1439 ms
preloaded-modules.min.js
1432 ms
underscore.min.js
1429 ms
wp-util.min.js
1252 ms
frontend.min.js
1250 ms
TM-logo.jpg
1220 ms
mackbook-1.png
990 ms
logos-design.jpg
1195 ms
logo-design_2-2.jpg
1401 ms
healthy-click-uiux-design-3.jpg
1607 ms
police-uiux_2-5.jpg
1202 ms
hoxton-web-3.jpg
1193 ms
grapic-design-4.jpg
2408 ms
Portfolio-2.png
1600 ms
Portfolio-3.png
1407 ms
Portfolio-4.png
1424 ms
Portfolio-1.png
1607 ms
seo_1-2.jpg
1615 ms
seo_2-2.jpg
1632 ms
seo_3-2.jpg
1928 ms
seo_4-3.jpg
1933 ms
Layer-4-1.png
1730 ms
analytics.js
40 ms
js
125 ms
ProximaNovaSoft-Regular.otf
1726 ms
Proxima-Nova-Soft-W03-Regular.ttf
1760 ms
8AD3jaY2BkYGDgAWIxIGZiYARCESBmAfMYAAR6AEMAAAABAAAAANXtRbgAAAAA2AhRFAAAAADYCNuG
1 ms
4iCv6KVjbNBYlgoC1CzjsGyI.ttf
54 ms
4iCs6KVjbNBYlgoKfw7z.ttf
85 ms
4iCv6KVjbNBYlgoCjC3jsGyI.ttf
89 ms
4iCv6KVjbNBYlgoCxCvjsGyI.ttf
90 ms
collect
70 ms
proxima-nova-soft.otf
1835 ms
fa-brands-400.woff
1850 ms
fa-brands-400.woff
1891 ms
fa-solid-900.woff
2029 ms
fa-solid-900.woff
2047 ms
collect
55 ms
fa-regular-400.woff
1983 ms
ga-audiences
75 ms
fa-regular-400.woff
1897 ms
Path-111042.svg
1628 ms
print.css
208 ms
thomasmathew.net accessibility score
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles
ARIA progressbar elements do not have accessible names.
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
thomasmathew.net best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
thomasmathew.net SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Thomasmathew.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Thomasmathew.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
thomasmathew.net
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Thomasmathew. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: