2.4 sec in total
273 ms
1.7 sec
431 ms
Welcome to thomasmaxson.com homepage info - get ready to check Thomas Maxson best content right away, or after learning these important things about thomasmaxson.com
The blog and digital portfolio of Thomas Maxson. A center for useful WordPress techniques, best practices and valuable information.
Visit thomasmaxson.comWe analyzed Thomasmaxson.com page load time and found that the first response time was 273 ms and then it took 2.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 40% of websites can load faster.
thomasmaxson.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.6 s
62/100
10%
Value3.4 s
67/100
25%
Value5.6 s
54/100
10%
Value100 ms
98/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value7.4 s
48/100
10%
273 ms
123 ms
149 ms
174 ms
25 ms
Our browser made a total of 74 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 74% of them (55 requests) were addressed to the original Thomasmaxson.com, 5% (4 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 4% (3 requests) were made to S.ytimg.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (828 ms) belongs to the original domain Thomasmaxson.com.
Page size can be reduced by 455.8 kB (19%)
2.4 MB
1.9 MB
In fact, the total size of Thomasmaxson.com main page is 2.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 1.9 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 38.3 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 38.3 kB or 79% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 75.7 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Thomas Maxson images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 139.1 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 139.1 kB or 60% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 202.6 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Thomasmaxson.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 202.6 kB or 83% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 23 (33%)
69
46
The browser has sent 69 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Thomas Maxson. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 20 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 5 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
thomasmaxson.com
273 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
123 ms
styles.css
149 ms
maxson-projects.css
174 ms
css
25 ms
style.css
164 ms
jquery.js
235 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
171 ms
picturefill.min.js
199 ms
html5.js
20 ms
jquery-libraries.js
329 ms
jquery.form.min.js
274 ms
scripts.js
264 ms
maxson-projects-libraries.js
272 ms
maxson-projects.js
280 ms
jquery-custom.js
302 ms
ga.js
44 ms
logo-thomas-maxson.png
188 ms
Dxy4n0UT82o
103 ms
bg-project-teaser-zoom.png
166 ms
service-app-ios-screen-02-300x532.jpg
404 ms
xiphos-clothing-kettle-ball.png
174 ms
carolyn-randell-home.jpg
403 ms
ansarov-logo.jpg
370 ms
2014-world-cup-shields-algeria-600x268.jpg
397 ms
2014-world-cup-shields-argentina-600x268.jpg
396 ms
2014-world-cup-shields-australia-600x268.jpg
399 ms
2014-world-cup-shields-belgium-600x268.jpg
397 ms
2014-world-cup-shields-bosnia-and0herzegovina-600x268.jpg
438 ms
2014-world-cup-shields-brazil-600x268.jpg
436 ms
2014-world-cup-shields-cameroon.jpg
438 ms
2014-world-cup-shields-chile.jpg
437 ms
2014-world-cup-shields-colombia.jpg
478 ms
2014-world-cup-shields-costa-rica.jpg
470 ms
2014-world-cup-shields-croatia.jpg
562 ms
2014-world-cup-shields-ecuador.jpg
564 ms
2014-world-cup-shields-england.jpg
560 ms
2014-world-cup-shields-france.jpg
561 ms
2014-world-cup-shields-germany.jpg
547 ms
2014-world-cup-shields-ghana.jpg
601 ms
2014-world-cup-shields-greece.jpg
615 ms
2014-world-cup-shields-honduras.jpg
628 ms
2014-world-cup-shields-iran.jpg
700 ms
2014-world-cup-shields-italy.jpg
688 ms
2014-world-cup-shields-ivory-coast.jpg
703 ms
2014-world-cup-shields-japan.jpg
667 ms
2014-world-cup-shields-mexico.jpg
683 ms
2014-world-cup-shields-netherlands.jpg
754 ms
2014-world-cup-shields-nigeria.jpg
742 ms
2014-world-cup-shields-portugal.jpg
750 ms
2014-world-cup-shields-russia.jpg
815 ms
2014-world-cup-shields-south-korea.jpg
828 ms
2014-world-cup-shields-spain.jpg
768 ms
2014-world-cup-shields-switzerland.jpg
810 ms
__utm.gif
67 ms
zhcz-_WihjSQC0oHJ9TCYBsxEYwM7FgeyaSgU71cLG0.woff
60 ms
IQHow_FEYlDC4Gzy_m8fcgFhaRv2pGgT5Kf0An0s4MM.woff
61 ms
Dxy4n0UT82o
59 ms
2014-world-cup-shields-united-states.jpg
674 ms
2014-world-cup-shields-uruguay.jpg
676 ms
icon-social-media.png
682 ms
www-embed-player-vflfNyN_r.css
12 ms
www-embed-player.js
52 ms
base.js
82 ms
Tqng9ngJVK4Gqvh3e602hP-HqlN49KFEUSDtmrOPmWo.js
48 ms
ad_status.js
48 ms
btn-join-google-plus.png
501 ms
icon-menu.gif
505 ms
zN7GBFwfMP4uA6AR0HCoLQ.ttf
68 ms
RxZJdnzeo3R5zSexge8UUaCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
68 ms
all.js
72 ms
widgets.js
114 ms
plusone.js
51 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_0
6 ms
thomasmaxson.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
thomasmaxson.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
thomasmaxson.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Thomasmaxson.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Thomasmaxson.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
thomasmaxson.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Thomas Maxson. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: