Report Summary

  • 26

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    45% of other websites

  • 93

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 80% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 90

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    68% of websites

thomasmurray.com

Global Risk Intelligence | Thomas Murray

Page Load Speed

4.6 sec in total

First Response

447 ms

Resources Loaded

2.4 sec

Page Rendered

1.7 sec

thomasmurray.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to thomasmurray.com homepage info - get ready to check Thomas Murray best content for United Kingdom right away, or after learning these important things about thomasmurray.com

The leader in global risk, due diligence & cyber security solutions, protecting data, assets and reputations, supporting 80% of the world's largest banks.

Visit thomasmurray.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Thomasmurray.com page load time and found that the first response time was 447 ms and then it took 4.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

thomasmurray.com performance score

26

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.5 s

33/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value8.6 s

1/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value11.0 s

6/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,140 ms

22/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value25.5 s

0/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

thomasmurray.com

447 ms

sharethis.js

17 ms

gtm.js

71 ms

css_nuoHwF5YSESVYg88nP9zkbuyElhiH6we0e0ZyrknBiw.css

88 ms

css_JO693sfIsjRwd_2tUvVgZLkvYmezyulcSUZvRIVyRN8.css

259 ms

Our browser made a total of 73 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 88% of them (64 requests) were addressed to the original Thomasmurray.com, 5% (4 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 1% (1 request) were made to Platform-api.sharethis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (885 ms) belongs to the original domain Thomasmurray.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 2.0 MB (92%)

Content Size

2.2 MB

After Optimization

182.7 kB

In fact, the total size of Thomasmurray.com main page is 2.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.9 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-82%

Potential reduce by 69.1 kB

  • Original 84.7 kB
  • After minification 84.7 kB
  • After compression 15.6 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 69.1 kB or 82% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-98%

Potential reduce by 1.8 MB

  • Original 1.9 MB
  • After minification 41.9 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Thomas Murray needs image optimization as it can save up to 1.8 MB or 98% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-3%

Potential reduce by 3.9 kB

  • Original 124.9 kB
  • After minification 122.6 kB
  • After compression 120.9 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-95%

Potential reduce by 79.3 kB

  • Original 83.5 kB
  • After minification 4.4 kB
  • After compression 4.3 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Thomasmurray.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 79.3 kB or 95% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 7 (10%)

Requests Now

68

After Optimization

61

The browser has sent 68 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Thomas Murray. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 8 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

thomasmurray.com accessibility score

93

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best Practices

thomasmurray.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

thomasmurray.com SEO score

90

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Thomasmurray.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Thomasmurray.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Thomas Murray. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: