2.4 sec in total
751 ms
1.4 sec
232 ms
Visit thomaspark.co now to see the best up-to-date Thomas Park content for India and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about thomaspark.co
On web development, interface design, user research, and all the rest, from Philadelphia.
Visit thomaspark.coWe analyzed Thomaspark.co page load time and found that the first response time was 751 ms and then it took 1.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 30% of websites can load faster.
thomaspark.co performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.0 s
84/100
10%
Value2.9 s
80/100
25%
Value2.2 s
99/100
10%
Value120 ms
97/100
30%
Value0.103
89/100
15%
Value3.1 s
95/100
10%
751 ms
88 ms
142 ms
23 ms
229 ms
Our browser made a total of 25 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 72% of them (18 requests) were addressed to the original Thomaspark.co, 16% (4 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 8% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (751 ms) belongs to the original domain Thomaspark.co.
Page size can be reduced by 212.6 kB (67%)
316.1 kB
103.5 kB
In fact, the total size of Thomaspark.co main page is 316.1 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 30% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 165.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 15.4 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 15.4 kB or 77% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 459 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Thomas Park images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 100.2 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 100.2 kB or 61% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 96.5 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Thomaspark.co needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 96.5 kB or 86% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 12 (60%)
20
8
The browser has sent 20 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Thomas Park. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 9 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 5 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
thomaspark.co
751 ms
style.css
88 ms
codecolorer.css
142 ms
css
23 ms
jquery.js
229 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
146 ms
fdfootnotes.js
165 ms
jquery.fitvids.js
229 ms
jquery.placeholder.min.js
250 ms
custom.js
215 ms
most-shared-posts.css
238 ms
wp-embed.min.js
241 ms
style.css
276 ms
ga.js
114 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
93 ms
thomaspark.png
161 ms
menuicon.png
163 ms
border-long.png
165 ms
socialicons.png
161 ms
top.png
165 ms
cJZKeOuBrn4kERxqtaUH3T8E0i7KZn-EPnyo3HZu7kw.woff
111 ms
DXI1ORHCpsQm3Vp6mXoaTXhCUOGz7vYGh680lGh-uXM.woff
113 ms
k3k702ZOKiLJc3WVjuplzHhCUOGz7vYGh680lGh-uXM.woff
115 ms
EInbV5DfGHOiMmvb1Xr-hnhCUOGz7vYGh680lGh-uXM.woff
115 ms
__utm.gif
85 ms
thomaspark.co accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Form elements do not have associated labels
thomaspark.co best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
thomaspark.co SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Thomaspark.co can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Thomaspark.co main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
thomaspark.co
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Thomas Park. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: