6.5 sec in total
2 sec
4.2 sec
280 ms
Click here to check amazing Thomaspogge content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about thomaspogge.com
Visit thomaspogge.comWe analyzed Thomaspogge.com page load time and found that the first response time was 2 sec and then it took 4.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.
thomaspogge.com performance score
2013 ms
90 ms
62 ms
65 ms
146 ms
Our browser made a total of 83 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 59% of them (49 requests) were addressed to the original Thomaspogge.com, 5% (4 requests) were made to Translate.googleapis.com and 4% (3 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2 sec) belongs to the original domain Thomaspogge.com.
Page size can be reduced by 1.7 MB (67%)
2.5 MB
801.5 kB
In fact, the total size of Thomaspogge.com main page is 2.5 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 1.4 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 67.3 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 67.3 kB or 76% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 6.1 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Thomaspogge images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 834.3 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 834.3 kB or 61% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 754.0 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Thomaspogge.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 754.0 kB or 81% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 62 (79%)
78
16
The browser has sent 78 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Thomaspogge. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 46 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 18 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
thomaspogge.com
2013 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
90 ms
cnss.css
62 ms
toolbar.css
65 ms
style.css
146 ms
plugin_styles.css
64 ms
color-picker.min.css
65 ms
style.css
114 ms
default-style.css
115 ms
settings.css
175 ms
style.css
117 ms
third-parties.css
167 ms
style.css
297 ms
jetpack.css
221 ms
addtoany.min.css
169 ms
jquery.js
282 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
220 ms
cnss.js
229 ms
flags.js
230 ms
toolbar.js
273 ms
load-toolbar.js
1127 ms
jquery.themepunch.tools.min.js
1218 ms
jquery.themepunch.revolution.min.js
1214 ms
js
100 ms
element.js
32 ms
core.min.js
1123 ms
widget.min.js
1123 ms
mouse.min.js
1121 ms
sortable.min.js
1201 ms
devicepx-jetpack.js
5 ms
gprofiles.js
56 ms
wpgroho.js
1186 ms
jquery.flexslider-min.js
1211 ms
jquery.isotope.min.js
1255 ms
underscore.min.js
1255 ms
wp-util.min.js
1269 ms
backbone.min.js
1290 ms
mediaelement-and-player.min.js
1361 ms
mejs-gw-playlist.min.js
1270 ms
jquery.fancybox.pack.js
1301 ms
e-201611.js
18 ms
plugins.min.js
1337 ms
scripts.min.js
1297 ms
mediaelement-and-player.min.js
1366 ms
comment-reply.min.js
1296 ms
wp-embed.min.js
1311 ms
thomas-logo.png
135 ms
1403317422_google%20plus.png
163 ms
1368459524_facebook.png
190 ms
1368459556_twitter.png
189 ms
1368459699_in.png
190 ms
Thomas-Pogge-300x235.jpg
277 ms
page.js
46 ms
Z9abhAvYmVc
98 ms
video_embed
75 ms
fontello.woff
259 ms
translateelement.css
79 ms
main.js
104 ms
sm13.html
118 ms
jquery.min.js
28 ms
jwplayer.js
49 ms
icons.15.svg.css
57 ms
www-embed-player-vflfNyN_r.css
126 ms
www-embed-player.js
172 ms
base.js
526 ms
sharing-3.js
105 ms
element_main.js
100 ms
analytics.js
28 ms
widgets.js
15 ms
ga.js
124 ms
collect
66 ms
collect
444 ms
flags.png
332 ms
hovercard.css
251 ms
services.css
296 ms
fBnyGA8Aionz5086-mElmoOSPUuyQ1M9Un647_EjucU.js
111 ms
ad_status.js
95 ms
g.gif
26 ms
CrYjSnGjrRCn0pd9VQsnFOvvDin1pK8aKteLpeZ5c0A.woff
75 ms
RxZJdnzeo3R5zSexge8UUbO3LdcAZYWl9Si6vvxL-qU.woff
80 ms
translate_24dp.png
45 ms
l
64 ms
googlelogo_color_42x16dp.png
30 ms
thomaspogge.com SEO score
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Thomaspogge.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Thomaspogge.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
thomaspogge.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Thomaspogge. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: