5 sec in total
273 ms
3.7 sec
1.1 sec
Click here to check amazing Thomas Potter content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about thomaspotter.com
Welcome to Thomas Potter Ltd where we supply nuts, bolts and tools from our Cramlington office and have done for over 80 years!
Visit thomaspotter.comWe analyzed Thomaspotter.com page load time and found that the first response time was 273 ms and then it took 4.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.
thomaspotter.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value6.7 s
2/100
10%
Value9.6 s
0/100
25%
Value8.2 s
20/100
10%
Value870 ms
33/100
30%
Value0.107
88/100
15%
Value7.6 s
46/100
10%
273 ms
454 ms
18 ms
164 ms
391 ms
Our browser made a total of 26 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 81% of them (21 requests) were addressed to the original Thomaspotter.com, 8% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com and 8% (2 requests) were made to Ajax.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.5 sec) belongs to the original domain Thomaspotter.com.
Page size can be reduced by 241.7 kB (20%)
1.2 MB
980.4 kB
In fact, the total size of Thomaspotter.com main page is 1.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 820.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 12.5 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 12.5 kB or 76% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 8.9 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Thomas Potter images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 145.6 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 145.6 kB or 49% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 74.7 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Thomaspotter.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 74.7 kB or 87% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 10 (42%)
24
14
The browser has sent 24 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Thomas Potter. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 8 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
thomaspotter.com
273 ms
www.thomaspotter.com
454 ms
analytics.js
18 ms
style.css
164 ms
style_cms.css
391 ms
css
115 ms
jquery.min.js
16 ms
jquery-ui.min.js
107 ms
camera.css
159 ms
jquery.min.js
535 ms
jquery.mobile.customized.min.js
159 ms
jquery.easing.1.3.js
171 ms
camera.min.js
600 ms
settings.js
314 ms
collect
71 ms
logo.png
159 ms
logo-right.png
161 ms
nav-bg.png
160 ms
paslode.png
161 ms
locite.png
163 ms
rawl.png
163 ms
rocol.png
211 ms
camera_skins.png
321 ms
camera-loader.gif
320 ms
home-image4.png
1499 ms
home-image6.png
709 ms
thomaspotter.com accessibility score
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
thomaspotter.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Thomaspotter.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Thomaspotter.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
thomaspotter.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Thomas Potter. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: