2.7 sec in total
241 ms
1.6 sec
863 ms
Visit thomasurfing.nl now to see the best up-to-date ThomaSurfing content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about thomasurfing.nl
Visit thomasurfing.nlWe analyzed Thomasurfing.nl page load time and found that the first response time was 241 ms and then it took 2.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.
thomasurfing.nl performance score
241 ms
27 ms
40 ms
36 ms
36 ms
Our browser made a total of 47 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 0% of them (0 request) were addressed to the original Thomasurfing.nl, 15% (7 requests) were made to Youtube.com and 13% (6 requests) were made to 33.media.tumblr.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (535 ms) relates to the external source 38.media.tumblr.com.
Page size can be reduced by 767.1 kB (46%)
1.7 MB
913.7 kB
In fact, the total size of Thomasurfing.nl main page is 1.7 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Javascripts take 786.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 42.6 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 13.2 kB, which is 25% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 42.6 kB or 80% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 23.9 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. ThomaSurfing images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 495.4 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 495.4 kB or 63% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 205.1 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Thomasurfing.nl needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 205.1 kB or 83% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 13 (33%)
40
27
The browser has sent 40 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of ThomaSurfing. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 14 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
thomasurfing.tumblr.com
241 ms
pre_tumblelog.js
27 ms
jquery-1.9.1.min.js
40 ms
infinitescrolling.js
36 ms
tumblelog_post_message_queue.js
36 ms
stylesheet.css
35 ms
stylesheet.css
35 ms
index.js
35 ms
ga.js
98 ms
tumblr_inline_mvehw3j3871r1yol3.jpg
105 ms
tumblr_inline_mvehylZ4td1r1yol3.png
142 ms
tumblr_inline_mvehy3hdYK1r1yol3.jpg
244 ms
impixu
127 ms
tumblr_inline_mqp8k44ncB1qz4rgp.jpg
534 ms
tumblr_inline_mo6we4wPQG1qz4rgp.jpg
535 ms
tumblr_inline_mvehyu2rTl1r1yol3.jpg
155 ms
tumblr_inline_mp3tvwR1Ad1qz4rgp.jpg
63 ms
tumblr_inline_modvncyssF1qz4rgp.jpg
168 ms
tumblr_inline_modw35gmQP1qz4rgp.jpg
218 ms
impixu
54 ms
analytics.html
291 ms
Calluna-Regular-webfont.woff
48 ms
Calluna-Black-webfont.woff
46 ms
Gibson-SemiBold-webfont.woff
46 ms
Gibson-Regular-webfont.woff
45 ms
login_check.html
63 ms
4EcZiSyhizw
152 ms
TEe7WTwP4YQ
164 ms
eAqPXxCRcLw
240 ms
5wuKev5V6X0
240 ms
iTjxJTiTmSg
282 ms
rdpONKAmkz4
282 ms
-mKRud0KNcE
236 ms
__utm.gif
28 ms
avatar_0a125cbf960d_40.png
68 ms
iframe_logo.png
364 ms
www-embed-player-vflfNyN_r.css
36 ms
www-embed-player.js
90 ms
base.js
138 ms
rapid-3.36.js
269 ms
rapidworker-1.2.js
289 ms
Tqng9ngJVK4Gqvh3e602hP-HqlN49KFEUSDtmrOPmWo.js
165 ms
ad_status.js
173 ms
zN7GBFwfMP4uA6AR0HCoLQ.ttf
39 ms
RxZJdnzeo3R5zSexge8UUaCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
40 ms
ga.js
255 ms
analytics.js
160 ms
thomasurfing.nl SEO score
EN
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Thomasurfing.nl can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Thomasurfing.nl main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
thomasurfing.nl
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of ThomaSurfing. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: