2.4 sec in total
66 ms
2.3 sec
59 ms
Visit thomsonite.com now to see the best up-to-date Thomsonite content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about thomsonite.com
Explore and Experience Minnesota's North Shore at Thomsonite Inn. Enjoy the North Shore of Lutsen and Grand Marais regardless of the season. Then "come home" and relax in the comforts of your own room...
Visit thomsonite.comWe analyzed Thomsonite.com page load time and found that the first response time was 66 ms and then it took 2.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.
thomsonite.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.8 s
55/100
10%
Value6.8 s
7/100
25%
Value4.6 s
70/100
10%
Value590 ms
50/100
30%
Value0.027
100/100
15%
Value11.2 s
20/100
10%
66 ms
35 ms
32 ms
852 ms
72 ms
Our browser made a total of 42 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 2% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Thomsonite.com, 36% (15 requests) were made to Static.parastorage.com and 29% (12 requests) were made to Sentry-next.wixpress.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (852 ms) relates to the external source Polyfill-fastly.io.
Page size can be reduced by 560.7 kB (57%)
979.5 kB
418.8 kB
In fact, the total size of Thomsonite.com main page is 979.5 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 469.9 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 372.5 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 372.5 kB or 79% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 5.9 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Thomsonite images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 182.3 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 182.3 kB or 41% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 13 (50%)
26
13
The browser has sent 26 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Thomsonite. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 14 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.thomsonite.com
66 ms
minified.js
35 ms
focus-within-polyfill.js
32 ms
polyfill.min.js
852 ms
thunderbolt-commons.09398ec1.bundle.min.js
72 ms
main.e5a43201.bundle.min.js
72 ms
main.renderer.1d21f023.bundle.min.js
25 ms
lodash.min.js
73 ms
react.production.min.js
75 ms
react-dom.production.min.js
74 ms
siteTags.bundle.min.js
72 ms
fbevents.js
113 ms
gtm.js
154 ms
Thomsonite%20Inn_edited.png
292 ms
edb03b_191088d4ead543d084436639f13df342~mv2.jpg
420 ms
thomson-white.png
444 ms
edb03b_d8312534b3cf4b5883e53f09be8642b6~mv2.jpg
467 ms
edb03b_e7a1edb7a5394cff86f2b0a87645c18e~mv2.jpg
426 ms
bf0543_114b09771cb74624ac855fb7a3178c91~mv2.jpg
408 ms
starspng_edited.png
449 ms
thomson-grey.png
551 ms
bundle.min.js
120 ms
908c4810-64db-4b46-bb8e-823eb41f68c0.woff
34 ms
61bd362e-7162-46bd-b67e-28f366c4afbe.woff
35 ms
AvenirLTW05-35Light.woff
35 ms
406022031700170
125 ms
139 ms
136 ms
129 ms
132 ms
127 ms
125 ms
167 ms
162 ms
159 ms
160 ms
158 ms
158 ms
deprecation-en.v5.html
5 ms
bolt-performance
26 ms
deprecation-style.v5.css
9 ms
right-arrow.svg
4 ms
thomsonite.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
thomsonite.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
thomsonite.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Thomsonite.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Thomsonite.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
thomsonite.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Thomsonite. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: