2.8 sec in total
516 ms
2 sec
348 ms
Welcome to thought.co.uk homepage info - get ready to check Thought best content right away, or after learning these important things about thought.co.uk
We’ve been helping our clients make thoughtful use of technology for over 20 years, creating web and mobile applications.
Visit thought.co.ukWe analyzed Thought.co.uk page load time and found that the first response time was 516 ms and then it took 2.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.
thought.co.uk performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.9 s
24/100
10%
Value4.1 s
47/100
25%
Value8.2 s
20/100
10%
Value700 ms
42/100
30%
Value0.002
100/100
15%
Value11.0 s
21/100
10%
516 ms
23 ms
30 ms
33 ms
106 ms
Our browser made a total of 39 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 64% of them (25 requests) were addressed to the original Thought.co.uk, 23% (9 requests) were made to Cdn.thought.co.uk and 3% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (644 ms) belongs to the original domain Thought.co.uk.
Page size can be reduced by 15.6 kB (10%)
154.5 kB
138.9 kB
In fact, the total size of Thought.co.uk main page is 154.5 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 76.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 15.5 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 15.5 kB or 67% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 17 B
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 0 B
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Thought.co.uk has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 5 (14%)
37
32
The browser has sent 37 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Thought. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 6 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.thought.co.uk
516 ms
bootstrap-icons.css
23 ms
thought-front-end.css
30 ms
css2
33 ms
gtm.js
106 ms
hotjar-3884617.js
154 ms
logo-white.svg
78 ms
building-011.webp
97 ms
icon-arrows.svg
137 ms
icon-people.svg
133 ms
icon-bars.svg
95 ms
icon-heart.svg
130 ms
ai.2.min.js
130 ms
bathroom-brands.webp
117 ms
pattinson-card.webp
104 ms
elliotts.webp
115 ms
get-in-touch-bg.72b8557c.webp
67 ms
email-decode.min.js
37 ms
enterprise.js
116 ms
thought-front-end.js
54 ms
logo-vw.svg
63 ms
logo-amonline.svg
68 ms
logo-mcn.svg
70 ms
logo-paypal.svg
68 ms
logo-mercedes-benz.svg
107 ms
logo-baskeys.svg
96 ms
logo-bauer.svg
102 ms
logo-allendale.svg
113 ms
logo-faac.svg
109 ms
logo-pattinson.svg
101 ms
logo-burlington.svg
116 ms
logo-your-house.svg
119 ms
logo-elliots.svg
122 ms
logo-rail.svg
120 ms
logo-qvs.svg
122 ms
logo-fleetnews.svg
124 ms
logo-crosswater.svg
197 ms
logo-ryness.svg
199 ms
bootstrap-icons.woff
644 ms
thought.co.uk accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
thought.co.uk best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
thought.co.uk SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Thought.co.uk can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Thought.co.uk main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
thought.co.uk
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Thought. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: