879 ms in total
51 ms
828 ms
0 ms
Click here to check amazing Thought content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about thought.digital
We’ve been helping our clients make thoughtful use of technology for over 20 years, creating web and mobile applications.
Visit thought.digitalWe analyzed Thought.digital page load time and found that the first response time was 51 ms and then it took 828 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 15% of websites can load faster.
thought.digital performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.1 s
46/100
10%
Value3.4 s
66/100
25%
Value5.5 s
54/100
10%
Value870 ms
33/100
30%
Value0.002
100/100
15%
Value10.4 s
24/100
10%
51 ms
48 ms
580 ms
46 ms
28 ms
Our browser made a total of 40 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 5% of them (2 requests) were addressed to the original Thought.digital, 60% (24 requests) were made to Thought.co.uk and 23% (9 requests) were made to Cdn.thought.co.uk. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (580 ms) relates to the external source Thought.co.uk.
Page size can be reduced by 15.6 kB (10%)
154.5 kB
138.9 kB
In fact, the total size of Thought.digital main page is 154.5 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 76.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 15.5 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 15.5 kB or 68% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 17 B
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 0 B
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Thought.digital has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 5 (14%)
37
32
The browser has sent 37 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Thought. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 6 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
thought.digital
51 ms
thought.digital
48 ms
www.thought.co.uk
580 ms
bootstrap-icons.css
46 ms
thought-front-end.css
28 ms
css2
38 ms
gtm.js
110 ms
hotjar-3884617.js
156 ms
logo-white.svg
141 ms
building-011.webp
105 ms
icon-arrows.svg
139 ms
icon-people.svg
124 ms
icon-bars.svg
135 ms
icon-heart.svg
133 ms
ai.2.min.js
154 ms
email-decode.min.js
23 ms
enterprise.js
109 ms
thought-front-end.js
54 ms
bathroom-brands.webp
107 ms
pattinson-card.webp
109 ms
elliotts.webp
113 ms
get-in-touch-bg.72b8557c.webp
53 ms
logo-vw.svg
51 ms
logo-amonline.svg
69 ms
logo-mcn.svg
68 ms
logo-paypal.svg
66 ms
logo-mercedes-benz.svg
105 ms
logo-baskeys.svg
103 ms
logo-bauer.svg
106 ms
logo-allendale.svg
100 ms
logo-faac.svg
107 ms
logo-pattinson.svg
97 ms
logo-burlington.svg
109 ms
logo-your-house.svg
110 ms
logo-elliots.svg
108 ms
logo-rail.svg
114 ms
logo-qvs.svg
112 ms
logo-fleetnews.svg
111 ms
logo-crosswater.svg
116 ms
logo-ryness.svg
117 ms
thought.digital accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
thought.digital best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
thought.digital SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
N/A
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Thought.digital can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Thought.digital main page’s claimed encoding is . Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.
thought.digital
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Thought. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: