8 sec in total
129 ms
6.3 sec
1.5 sec
Click here to check amazing ThreatSHIELD Security content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about threatshieldsecurity.com
IT Managed Cybersecurity Services Manage Tampa and International | Pentest | Ransomware Remediation | Ethical Hacking | Pentesting
Visit threatshieldsecurity.comWe analyzed Threatshieldsecurity.com page load time and found that the first response time was 129 ms and then it took 7.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 85% of websites can load faster.
threatshieldsecurity.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.4 s
36/100
10%
Value8.1 s
2/100
25%
Value10.3 s
8/100
10%
Value2,200 ms
6/100
30%
Value0.005
100/100
15%
Value22.0 s
1/100
10%
129 ms
387 ms
80 ms
74 ms
63 ms
Our browser made a total of 121 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 40% of them (48 requests) were addressed to the original Threatshieldsecurity.com, 27% (33 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 18% (22 requests) were made to I0.wp.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (998 ms) relates to the external source I0.wp.com.
Page size can be reduced by 759.3 kB (31%)
2.4 MB
1.7 MB
In fact, the total size of Threatshieldsecurity.com main page is 2.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. Only a small number of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 1.5 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 290.8 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 290.8 kB or 85% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 14.1 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. ThreatSHIELD Security images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 445.2 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 445.2 kB or 29% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 9.3 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Threatshieldsecurity.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 9.3 kB or 27% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 56 (67%)
83
27
The browser has sent 83 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of ThreatSHIELD Security. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 35 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 23 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
threatshieldsecurity.com
129 ms
threatshieldsecurity.com
387 ms
js
80 ms
utilities.css
74 ms
css
63 ms
front.js
115 ms
utilities.css
63 ms
frontend-gtag.min.js
134 ms
utilities.js
8 ms
et-core-unified-906.min.css
136 ms
css
27 ms
utilities.js
26 ms
chunk-vendors.js
607 ms
chunk-common.js
438 ms
frontend.js
203 ms
hooks.min.js
203 ms
i18n.min.js
250 ms
index.js
474 ms
index.js
491 ms
jquery.min.js
363 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
312 ms
scripts.min.js
456 ms
scripts.js
435 ms
jquery.fitvids.js
492 ms
jquery.mobile.js
494 ms
frontend-bundle.min.js
510 ms
common.js
523 ms
api.js
49 ms
wp-polyfill.min.js
596 ms
index.js
551 ms
protection.js
556 ms
e-202445.js
24 ms
motion-effects.js
578 ms
sticky-elements.js
784 ms
cyber-security-08-1.png
320 ms
logoTSS.png
618 ms
t-DNS-Firewall-Cybersecurity-Services-Tampa.gif
380 ms
t-EDR-Cybersecurity-Services-Tampa.gif
325 ms
t-Intelligence-Cybersecurity-Tampa.gif
659 ms
Tampa-Pentesting-Cybersecurity.gif
812 ms
Website-gif-t-SIEM-1.gif
998 ms
cyber-security-02.png
433 ms
cyber-security-icon-18.png
511 ms
cyber-security-icon-28.png
392 ms
cyber-security-icon-16.png
413 ms
cyber-security-icon-36.png
431 ms
cyber-security-icon-6.png
448 ms
cyber-security-04-1.png
812 ms
cyber-security-14-1.jpg
469 ms
7.png
510 ms
cyber-security-icon-14.png
531 ms
cyber-security-icon-20.png
528 ms
cyber-security-icon-7.png
549 ms
cyber-security-icon-13.png
558 ms
cyber-security-11-1.png
904 ms
cyber-security-16.png
902 ms
phones-vcard.png
658 ms
cyber-security-18.png
509 ms
phones-vcard.png
654 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4uaVc.ttf
137 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0B4uaVc.ttf
153 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1x4uaVc.ttf
152 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4uaVc.ttf
155 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgshZ1x4uaVc.ttf
155 ms
modules.woff
488 ms
S6u9w4BMUTPHh6UVSwaPHA.ttf
153 ms
S6u9w4BMUTPHh50XSwaPHA.ttf
152 ms
S6uyw4BMUTPHjxAwWw.ttf
179 ms
S6u9w4BMUTPHh7USSwaPHA.ttf
181 ms
S6u8w4BMUTPHh30AUi-v.ttf
180 ms
memQYaGs126MiZpBA-UFUIcVXSCEkx2cmqvXlWq8tWZ0Pw86hd0RkyFjWV4exQ.ttf
182 ms
memQYaGs126MiZpBA-UFUIcVXSCEkx2cmqvXlWq8tWZ0Pw86hd0Rk0ZjWV4exQ.ttf
181 ms
memQYaGs126MiZpBA-UFUIcVXSCEkx2cmqvXlWq8tWZ0Pw86hd0RkxhjWV4exQ.ttf
179 ms
memQYaGs126MiZpBA-UFUIcVXSCEkx2cmqvXlWq8tWZ0Pw86hd0Rk8ZkWV4exQ.ttf
201 ms
memQYaGs126MiZpBA-UFUIcVXSCEkx2cmqvXlWq8tWZ0Pw86hd0Rk5hkWV4exQ.ttf
200 ms
qFda35WCmI96Ajtm83upeyoaX6QPnlo6zvPbMJqP.ttf
156 ms
qFda35WCmI96Ajtm83upeyoaX6QPnlo6_PPbMJqP.ttf
136 ms
qFda35WCmI96Ajtm83upeyoaX6QPnlo6ovPbMJqP.ttf
136 ms
qFda35WCmI96Ajtm83upeyoaX6QPnlo6fPPbMJqP.ttf
157 ms
qFda35WCmI96Ajtm83upeyoaX6QPnlo6_PLbMJqP.ttf
157 ms
qFda35WCmI96Ajtm83upeyoaX6QPnlo6IvTbMJqP.ttf
135 ms
qFda35WCmI96Ajtm83upeyoaX6QPnlo6G_TbMJqP.ttf
136 ms
qFda35WCmI96Ajtm83upeyoaX6QPnlo6fPTbMJqP.ttf
156 ms
qFda35WCmI96Ajtm83upeyoaX6QPnlo6VfTbMJqP.ttf
158 ms
qFdU35WCmI96Ajtm81GgSdXCNs-VMF0vNLDkfaqGncY.ttf
182 ms
qFdU35WCmI96Ajtm81GgSdXCNs-VMF0vNLCDfaqGncY.ttf
185 ms
qFdU35WCmI96Ajtm81GgSdXCNs-VMF0vNLCqfaqGncY.ttf
184 ms
qFdU35WCmI96Ajtm81GgSdXCNs-VMF0vNLDdfaqGncY.ttf
184 ms
qFdU35WCmI96Ajtm81GgSdXCNs-VMF0vNLAxeqqGncY.ttf
185 ms
qFdU35WCmI96Ajtm81GgSdXCNs-VMF0vNLADeqqGncY.ttf
205 ms
qFdU35WCmI96Ajtm81GgSdXCNs-VMF0vNLBdeqqGncY.ttf
207 ms
qFdU35WCmI96Ajtm81GgSdXCNs-VMF0vNLCDeqqGncY.ttf
223 ms
qFdU35WCmI96Ajtm81GgSdXCNs-VMF0vNLADe6qGncY.ttf
221 ms
default
183 ms
et-divi-dynamic-tb-239160-tb-136-906-late.css
393 ms
recaptcha__en.js
181 ms
divi-amelia.css
64 ms
divi-amelia.css
63 ms
mediaelementplayer-legacy.min.css
65 ms
mediaelementplayer-legacy.min.css
64 ms
wp-mediaelement.min.css
63 ms
wp-mediaelement.min.css
63 ms
frontend.css
65 ms
frontend.css
65 ms
styles.css
63 ms
styles.css
64 ms
style.css
64 ms
style.css
64 ms
choices.min.css
65 ms
choices.min.css
65 ms
style.css
64 ms
style.css
64 ms
frontend.css
65 ms
frontend.css
123 ms
twk-event-polyfill.js
122 ms
twk-main.js
193 ms
twk-vendor.js
235 ms
twk-chunk-vendors.js
194 ms
twk-chunk-common.js
250 ms
twk-runtime.js
205 ms
twk-app.js
191 ms
threatshieldsecurity.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
[id] attributes on active, focusable elements are not unique
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
threatshieldsecurity.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools
threatshieldsecurity.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Threatshieldsecurity.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Threatshieldsecurity.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
threatshieldsecurity.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of ThreatSHIELD Security. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: