Tools & Wizards About Us
tidelift.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 12

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    25% of other websites

  • 81

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 51% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 75

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    32% of websites

tidelift.com

Tidelift | Reduce security risk from bad open source packages

Page Load Speed

1.7 sec in total

First Response

37 ms

Resources Loaded

1.1 sec

Page Rendered

585 ms

tidelift.com screenshot

About Website

Visit tidelift.com now to see the best up-to-date Tidelift content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about tidelift.com

Reduce security risk from bad open source packages and ensure the packages you rely on keep getting better.

Visit tidelift.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Tidelift.com page load time and found that the first response time was 37 ms and then it took 1.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 35% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

tidelift.com performance score

12

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.1 s

46/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value32.3 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value6.5 s

39/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value2,580 ms

4/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.491

17/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value20.5 s

2/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

tidelift.com

37 ms

tidelift.com

134 ms

module_158739822895_Q1-2024_Typewriter_Preloaded_Module.min.css

99 ms

module_44722519191_Image_Only_Flex-boxes-multi-columns.min.css

121 ms

swiper-bundle.min.css

136 ms

Our browser made a total of 77 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 8% of them (6 requests) were addressed to the original Tidelift.com, 47% (36 requests) were made to 4008838.fs1.hubspotusercontent-na1.net and 13% (10 requests) were made to Cdn2.hubspot.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (566 ms) relates to the external source 4008838.fs1.hubspotusercontent-na1.net.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 241.8 kB (6%)

Content Size

4.3 MB

After Optimization

4.0 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Tidelift.com main page is 4.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 3.9 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-85%

Potential reduce by 110.4 kB

  • Original 129.6 kB
  • After minification 113.3 kB
  • After compression 19.2 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 16.3 kB, which is 13% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 110.4 kB or 85% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 46.5 kB

  • Original 3.9 MB
  • After minification 3.9 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Tidelift images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-39%

Potential reduce by 67.8 kB

  • Original 172.9 kB
  • After minification 172.9 kB
  • After compression 105.0 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 67.8 kB or 39% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-38%

Potential reduce by 17.1 kB

  • Original 44.4 kB
  • After minification 44.4 kB
  • After compression 27.4 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Tidelift.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 17.1 kB or 38% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 32 (46%)

Requests Now

70

After Optimization

38

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 70 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Tidelift. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 26 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 8 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

tidelift.com

tidelift.com

37 ms

tidelift.com

tidelift.com

134 ms

module_158739822895_Q1-2024_Typewriter_Preloaded_Module.min.css

module_158739822895_Q1-2024_Typewriter_Preloaded_Module.min.css

99 ms

module_44722519191_Image_Only_Flex-boxes-multi-columns.min.css

module_44722519191_Image_Only_Flex-boxes-multi-columns.min.css

121 ms

swiper-bundle.min.css

swiper-bundle.min.css

136 ms

module_156556956260_Maintainer_Advantage_Swiper_Slider.min.css

module_156556956260_Maintainer_Advantage_Swiper_Slider.min.css

134 ms

module_37402112797_Flex-boxes-multi-columns.min.css

module_37402112797_Flex-boxes-multi-columns.min.css

144 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

64 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

73 ms

uc.js

uc.js

63 ms

css2

css2

71 ms

4008838.js

4008838.js

71 ms

lozad.min.js

lozad.min.js

54 ms

layout.min.css

layout.min.css

132 ms

tidelift18.css

tidelift18.css

162 ms

94ab9ccac3.js

94ab9ccac3.js

108 ms

core.js

core.js

112 ms

tidelift.js

tidelift.js

138 ms

embed.js

embed.js

62 ms

project.js

project.js

78 ms

project.js

project.js

98 ms

swiper-bundle.min.js

swiper-bundle.min.js

210 ms

4008838.js

4008838.js

95 ms

index.js

index.js

102 ms

login.min.js

login.min.js

197 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

293 ms

6si.min.js

6si.min.js

224 ms

fbevents.js

fbevents.js

196 ms

sl.js

sl.js

242 ms

tracking.js

tracking.js

246 ms

collectedforms.js

collectedforms.js

245 ms

banner.js

banner.js

246 ms

fb.js

fb.js

240 ms

feedbackweb-new.js

feedbackweb-new.js

239 ms

conversations-embed.js

conversations-embed.js

239 ms

leadflows.js

leadflows.js

244 ms

4008838.js

4008838.js

307 ms

Arrow-right-white.png

Arrow-right-white.png

292 ms

Tidelift-logo-on-light.svg

Tidelift-logo-on-light.svg

285 ms

Home-banner-2023.png

Home-banner-2023.png

306 ms

wiggly%20background-v2.png

wiggly%20background-v2.png

295 ms

2560px-USGS_logo_green.png

2560px-USGS_logo_green.png

303 ms

AirForce-logowithwords.png

AirForce-logowithwords.png

315 ms

240px-Jet_Propulsion_Laboratory_logo.svg.png

240px-Jet_Propulsion_Laboratory_logo.svg.png

566 ms

fannie-mae-logo-dark-blue.png

fannie-mae-logo-dark-blue.png

311 ms

hughes-452x115.png

hughes-452x115.png

321 ms

DARPA_Logo_2010.png

DARPA_Logo_2010.png

345 ms

check%20in%20green%20gradient%20circle.png

check%20in%20green%20gradient%20circle.png

332 ms

jackson-databind.png

jackson-databind.png

344 ms

minimist.png

minimist.png

363 ms

urllib3.svg

urllib3.svg

345 ms

sockjs.png

sockjs.png

359 ms

Piillow.png

Piillow.png

371 ms

mongoose-1.png

mongoose-1.png

380 ms

-vpgLk4r_400x400.jpg

-vpgLk4r_400x400.jpg

377 ms

Tidelift_HomepageAssets_a01v01_BadPackages.gif

Tidelift_HomepageAssets_a01v01_BadPackages.gif

444 ms

Tidelift_HomepageAssets_a01v01_Proactive.gif

Tidelift_HomepageAssets_a01v01_Proactive.gif

446 ms

Reduce%20s.r..svg

Reduce%20s.r..svg

403 ms

Improve%20p..svg

Improve%20p..svg

429 ms

Improve%20a.q..svg

Improve%20a.q..svg

412 ms

Increase%20o.e..svg

Increase%20o.e..svg

426 ms

Home-Resources-waves-bg-tinified.png

Home-Resources-waves-bg-tinified.png

438 ms

1200x628%20(4).png

1200x628%20(4).png

459 ms

10-questions.png

10-questions.png

454 ms

The%20xz%20backdoor%20What%20you%20need%20to%20know.png

The%20xz%20backdoor%20What%20you%20need%20to%20know.png

467 ms

Tidelift_logo_for-dark.png

Tidelift_logo_for-dark.png

539 ms

map-marker-orange.png

map-marker-orange.png

483 ms

Upstream-WhiteLogo-NotFinal.svg

Upstream-WhiteLogo-NotFinal.svg

487 ms

YouTube_light_icon_(2017).svg

YouTube_light_icon_(2017).svg

488 ms

Aileron-Regular.woff

Aileron-Regular.woff

519 ms

Aileron-Light.woff

Aileron-Light.woff

372 ms

Aileron-SemiBold.woff

Aileron-SemiBold.woff

553 ms

Typold-Bold.woff

Typold-Bold.woff

400 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

66 ms

r

r

70 ms

i

i

5 ms

gif.gif

gif.gif

22 ms

Accessibility Review

tidelift.com accessibility score

81

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

[role]s are not contained by their required parent element

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

tidelift.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

tidelift.com SEO score

75

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Tidelift.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Tidelift.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

tidelift.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Tidelift. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: