6.6 sec in total
874 ms
5 sec
772 ms
Click here to check amazing TIDE Technology content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about tidetechnology.com
TIDE Technology offers unique outsources R&D services based on our approach of "Innovative Startup Mentality synthesized with Reliable Enterprise Mindset".
Visit tidetechnology.comWe analyzed Tidetechnology.com page load time and found that the first response time was 874 ms and then it took 5.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 75% of websites can load faster.
tidetechnology.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value5.3 s
7/100
10%
Value7.5 s
4/100
25%
Value9.8 s
10/100
10%
Value2,400 ms
5/100
30%
Value0.008
100/100
15%
Value14.5 s
9/100
10%
874 ms
148 ms
294 ms
427 ms
570 ms
Our browser made a total of 84 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 75% of them (63 requests) were addressed to the original Tidetechnology.com, 12% (10 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 8% (7 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.7 sec) belongs to the original domain Tidetechnology.com.
Page size can be reduced by 623.3 kB (17%)
3.6 MB
3.0 MB
In fact, the total size of Tidetechnology.com main page is 3.6 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 3.0 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 61.3 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 61.3 kB or 81% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 524.2 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, TIDE Technology needs image optimization as it can save up to 524.2 kB or 17% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 28.4 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 9.3 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Tidetechnology.com has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 50 (70%)
71
21
The browser has sent 71 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of TIDE Technology. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 31 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 21 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.tidetechnology.com
874 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
148 ms
style.min.css
294 ms
front_end_style.css
427 ms
dashicons.min.css
570 ms
desktop_style.css
431 ms
styles.css
436 ms
jquery-ui-1.10.3.custom.css
439 ms
jquery-ui-spinner.css
441 ms
calendar-jos.css
569 ms
intlTelInput.css
573 ms
form_maker_frontend.css
581 ms
css
49 ms
style.css
880 ms
shortcodes.css
591 ms
shortcodes_responsive.css
712 ms
magnific_popup.css
710 ms
jquery.js
859 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
727 ms
ga-scroll-events.js
737 ms
if_gmap_front_end.js
852 ms
intlTelInput.js
996 ms
calendar.js
873 ms
calendar_function.js
909 ms
css
47 ms
css
43 ms
css
45 ms
css
44 ms
css
45 ms
css
60 ms
frontend-builder-global-functions.js
1038 ms
scripts.js
1079 ms
widget.min.js
1080 ms
core.min.js
1084 ms
mouse.min.js
1090 ms
slider.min.js
1134 ms
button.min.js
1134 ms
spinner.min.js
1148 ms
effect.min.js
1180 ms
effect-shake.min.js
1230 ms
datepicker.min.js
1229 ms
api.js
46 ms
jquery.mobile.custom.min.js
1316 ms
custom.js
1317 ms
smoothscroll.js
1322 ms
new-tab.min.js
1183 ms
jquery.fitvids.js
1089 ms
waypoints.min.js
959 ms
jquery.magnific-popup.js
996 ms
frontend-builder-scripts.js
992 ms
wp-embed.min.js
995 ms
analytics.js
100 ms
Logo-site.png
445 ms
baner-3be.jpg
930 ms
0.png
490 ms
3-2.png
527 ms
2-2.png
529 ms
1-3.png
536 ms
tech1.jpg
566 ms
tech2.jpg
636 ms
tech3.jpg
670 ms
tech4.jpg
671 ms
tech5.jpg
679 ms
tech6.jpg
713 ms
iStock-638439346-3.jpg
1663 ms
Untitled-2.jpg
814 ms
cicrcle2-light.png
955 ms
IN.png
821 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4uaVQ.woff
34 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0B4uaVQ.woff
40 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1x4uaVQ.woff
54 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4uaVQ.woff
63 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgshZ1x4uaVQ.woff
64 ms
neotech-webfont.woff
814 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1y4k.woff
69 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgshZ1y4k.woff
65 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1y4k.woff
67 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0C4k.woff
64 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0C4k.woff
67 ms
modules.ttf
914 ms
collect
66 ms
recaptcha__en.js
24 ms
refill
1009 ms
ajax-loader.gif
564 ms
tidetechnology.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
tidetechnology.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
tidetechnology.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Tidetechnology.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Tidetechnology.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
tidetechnology.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of TIDE Technology. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: