23.7 sec in total
761 ms
22.3 sec
571 ms
Visit tifr.us now to see the best up-to-date Tifr content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about tifr.us
Visit tifr.usWe analyzed Tifr.us page load time and found that the first response time was 761 ms and then it took 22.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 95% of websites can load faster. Unfortunately, there was 1 request timeout, which can generally increase the web page load time, as the browser stays idle while waiting for website response.
tifr.us performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.5 s
34/100
10%
Value3.9 s
54/100
25%
Value3.5 s
88/100
10%
Value210 ms
89/100
30%
Value0.105
89/100
15%
Value4.2 s
86/100
10%
761 ms
610 ms
879 ms
23 ms
22 ms
Our browser made a total of 46 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 28% of them (13 requests) were addressed to the original Tifr.us, 11% (5 requests) were made to Static.xx.fbcdn.net and 9% (4 requests) were made to Facebook.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (20.4 sec) relates to the external source Psdata.chitika.net.
Page size can be reduced by 1.6 MB (75%)
2.1 MB
528.8 kB
In fact, the total size of Tifr.us main page is 2.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 1.3 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 128.2 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 128.2 kB or 85% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 131.0 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Tifr needs image optimization as it can save up to 131.0 kB or 91% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 888.5 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 888.5 kB or 69% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 443.0 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Tifr.us needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 443.0 kB or 83% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 19 (44%)
43
24
The browser has sent 43 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Tifr. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 20 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
tifr.us
761 ms
application-02339186e0232d465f43ee597bc5e1a2.css
610 ms
application-46754f2381f578721f5616cdf4581895.js
879 ms
all.js
23 ms
getads.js
22 ms
pinit.js
19 ms
analytics.js
35 ms
logo_beta-8e78c24dc81bb97c1d2c6955bca9015f.png
97 ms
icon_tifr-bf3bf08d1792fcc1ec856e16c1ef69c9.png
72 ms
delete_icon-ca162e181aedc9649ff70fdf6f3dc008.png
69 ms
icon_face-8623e618506111667c999fccef809ad3.png
213 ms
PenisMug.jpg
224 ms
logo-c71b64302e649e9aad9e1e8fb8024152.png
214 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
191 ms
185 ms
collect
62 ms
xd_arbiter.php
64 ms
xd_arbiter.php
155 ms
bg-unsafe-59a4f9565e3c34ba1dca7ce7e451db59.png
151 ms
sharing-button-a-cd67afeea57cc8dc5f60cab1ed49305f.png
150 ms
other-buttons-ab3e1d4e0fd6314a3506d0b5e635ec86.png
152 ms
widgets.js
102 ms
minimall
145 ms
minimall
161 ms
pinit_main.js
129 ms
graph.facebook.com
266 ms
button.71000885400e222c3c0eec823f8f93f0.js
32 ms
linx.js
23 ms
highlight.js
25 ms
adhesion.js
26 ms
jquery.min.js
33 ms
xd_arbiter.php
15 ms
extract
20438 ms
minimall
159 ms
follow_button.fd774b599f565016d763dd860cb31c79.en.html
27 ms
like.php
136 ms
info.json
124 ms
like.php
123 ms
like.php
126 ms
Sh_BYjerrZ8.js
48 ms
LVx-xkvaJ0b.png
21 ms
Sh_BYjerrZ8.js
17 ms
Sh_BYjerrZ8.js
54 ms
Sh_BYjerrZ8.js
50 ms
jot.html
3 ms
close_white_on_black.gif
34 ms
tifr.us accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Document doesn't have a <title> element
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
tifr.us best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools
tifr.us SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Document doesn't have a <title> element
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Page is blocked from indexing
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document doesn't use legible font sizes
N/A
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Tifr.us can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else) and no language is claimed in <html> or <meta> tags either. Our system also found out that Tifr.us main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
tifr.us
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Tifr. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: