Report Summary

  • 31

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    51% of other websites

  • 81

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 52% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 86

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    60% of websites

tigerlady.com

Women's Self Defense - Natural scratching tool for women's safety

Page Load Speed

4.1 sec in total

First Response

362 ms

Resources Loaded

3.2 sec

Page Rendered

528 ms

tigerlady.com screenshot

About Website

Visit tigerlady.com now to see the best up-to-date Tigerlady content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about tigerlady.com

Self-defense for women in a small, lightweight device. Runners love to use TigerLady as Running Safety Grips. Walk or run with a sense of quiet confidence.

Visit tigerlady.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Tigerlady.com page load time and found that the first response time was 362 ms and then it took 3.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

tigerlady.com performance score

31

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.2 s

43/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value4.7 s

32/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value6.8 s

35/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value2,020 ms

7/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.102

89/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value25.6 s

0/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

www.tigerlady.com

362 ms

styles.scss.css

137 ms

css

125 ms

jquery.min.js

129 ms

app.js

164 ms

Our browser made a total of 106 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 2% of them (2 requests) were addressed to the original Tigerlady.com, 34% (36 requests) were made to Cdn.shopify.com and 12% (13 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (794 ms) relates to the external source Surveymonkey.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 1.0 MB (36%)

Content Size

2.8 MB

After Optimization

1.8 MB

In fact, the total size of Tigerlady.com main page is 2.8 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 1.4 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-78%

Potential reduce by 43.6 kB

  • Original 55.7 kB
  • After minification 49.0 kB
  • After compression 12.1 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 6.7 kB, which is 12% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 43.6 kB or 78% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-3%

Potential reduce by 48.9 kB

  • Original 1.4 MB
  • After minification 1.4 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Tigerlady images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-62%

Potential reduce by 537.8 kB

  • Original 865.5 kB
  • After minification 848.5 kB
  • After compression 327.7 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 537.8 kB or 62% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-82%

Potential reduce by 387.8 kB

  • Original 470.3 kB
  • After minification 469.3 kB
  • After compression 82.5 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Tigerlady.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 387.8 kB or 82% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 57 (65%)

Requests Now

88

After Optimization

31

The browser has sent 88 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Tigerlady. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 33 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 14 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

tigerlady.com accessibility score

81

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

ARIA IDs are not unique

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

High

Some elements have a [tabindex] value greater than 0

Best Practices

tigerlady.com best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

tigerlady.com SEO score

86

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Tigerlady.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Tigerlady.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Tigerlady. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: