Tools & Wizards About Us
tigerpak.co.uk screenshot

Report Summary

  • 15

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    27% of other websites

  • 86

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 61% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 83

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    46% of websites

tigerpak.co.uk

Bespoke Polystyrene | Polystyrene Packaging | Tigerpak

Page Load Speed

10.6 sec in total

First Response

1.9 sec

Resources Loaded

8.4 sec

Page Rendered

313 ms

tigerpak.co.uk screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Tigerpak content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about tigerpak.co.uk

Providing polystyrene and foam packaging solutions, general packaging supplies and polystyrene construction materials. Call for a free quote.

Visit tigerpak.co.uk

Key Findings

We analyzed Tigerpak.co.uk page load time and found that the first response time was 1.9 sec and then it took 8.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 85% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

tigerpak.co.uk performance score

15

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value8.4 s

0/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value16.7 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value20.4 s

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,300 ms

18/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.199

62/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value15.5 s

7/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

www.tigerpak.co.uk

1856 ms

cleantalk-public.min.css

315 ms

styles.css

326 ms

lightbox.min.css

332 ms

rs6.css

409 ms

Our browser made a total of 56 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 71% of them (40 requests) were addressed to the original Tigerpak.co.uk, 14% (8 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 5% (3 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.9 sec) belongs to the original domain Tigerpak.co.uk.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 247.4 kB (16%)

Content Size

1.6 MB

After Optimization

1.3 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Tigerpak.co.uk main page is 1.6 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 908.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 160.2 kB

  • Original 194.1 kB
  • After minification 190.5 kB
  • After compression 34.0 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 160.2 kB or 83% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 4.4 kB

  • Original 908.0 kB
  • After minification 903.6 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Tigerpak images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-16%

Potential reduce by 67.4 kB

  • Original 419.9 kB
  • After minification 419.9 kB
  • After compression 352.4 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 67.4 kB or 16% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-29%

Potential reduce by 15.4 kB

  • Original 52.5 kB
  • After minification 52.3 kB
  • After compression 37.1 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Tigerpak.co.uk needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 15.4 kB or 29% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 30 (65%)

Requests Now

46

After Optimization

16

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 46 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Tigerpak. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 19 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 13 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

www.tigerpak.co.uk

www.tigerpak.co.uk

1856 ms

cleantalk-public.min.css

cleantalk-public.min.css

315 ms

styles.css

styles.css

326 ms

lightbox.min.css

lightbox.min.css

332 ms

rs6.css

rs6.css

409 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

433 ms

css

css

46 ms

style.css

style.css

332 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

714 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

654 ms

apbct-public-bundle.min.js

apbct-public-bundle.min.js

732 ms

rbtools.min.js

rbtools.min.js

826 ms

rs6.min.js

rs6.min.js

964 ms

js

js

149 ms

js

js

231 ms

et-core-unified-35391.min.css

et-core-unified-35391.min.css

750 ms

css

css

62 ms

font-awesome.css

font-awesome.css

34 ms

mediaelementplayer-legacy.min.css

mediaelementplayer-legacy.min.css

1045 ms

wp-mediaelement.min.css

wp-mediaelement.min.css

1047 ms

index.js

index.js

1047 ms

index.js

index.js

1122 ms

scripts.min.js

scripts.min.js

1361 ms

jquery.fitvids.js

jquery.fitvids.js

1316 ms

frontend-bundle.min.js

frontend-bundle.min.js

1330 ms

common.js

common.js

1355 ms

smush-lazy-load.min.js

smush-lazy-load.min.js

1352 ms

mediaelement-and-player.min.js

mediaelement-and-player.min.js

1542 ms

mediaelement-migrate.min.js

mediaelement-migrate.min.js

1633 ms

wp-mediaelement.min.js

wp-mediaelement.min.js

1657 ms

motion-effects.js

motion-effects.js

1828 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

100 ms

IMG_20171208_115245_001.jpg

IMG_20171208_115245_001.jpg

954 ms

5-1.jpg

5-1.jpg

1210 ms

6xK3dSBYKcSV-LCoeQqfX1RYOo3qNq7g.ttf

6xK3dSBYKcSV-LCoeQqfX1RYOo3qNq7g.ttf

75 ms

6xKydSBYKcSV-LCoeQqfX1RYOo3ik4zwmRdr.ttf

6xKydSBYKcSV-LCoeQqfX1RYOo3ik4zwmRdr.ttf

94 ms

6xKydSBYKcSV-LCoeQqfX1RYOo3i94_wmRdr.ttf

6xKydSBYKcSV-LCoeQqfX1RYOo3i94_wmRdr.ttf

113 ms

6xKydSBYKcSV-LCoeQqfX1RYOo3i54rwmRdr.ttf

6xKydSBYKcSV-LCoeQqfX1RYOo3i54rwmRdr.ttf

128 ms

6xKydSBYKcSV-LCoeQqfX1RYOo3ig4vwmRdr.ttf

6xKydSBYKcSV-LCoeQqfX1RYOo3ig4vwmRdr.ttf

128 ms

6xKydSBYKcSV-LCoeQqfX1RYOo3iu4nwmRdr.ttf

6xKydSBYKcSV-LCoeQqfX1RYOo3iu4nwmRdr.ttf

129 ms

modules.woff

modules.woff

800 ms

preloader.gif

preloader.gif

613 ms

et-divi-dynamic-tb-35597-tb-35802-35391-late.css

et-divi-dynamic-tb-35597-tb-35802-35391-late.css

761 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9.ttf

19 ms

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf

19 ms

tigerpak-logo-cut-out-Converted.svg

tigerpak-logo-cut-out-Converted.svg

315 ms

home-01.svg

home-01.svg

317 ms

mobile-01.svg

mobile-01.svg

318 ms

email-01.svg

email-01.svg

319 ms

shutterstock_604565636-resized.jpg

shutterstock_604565636-resized.jpg

474 ms

boxes-card.jpg

boxes-card.jpg

470 ms

shutterstock_1434007208-resized.jpg

shutterstock_1434007208-resized.jpg

869 ms

prev.png

prev.png

562 ms

next.png

next.png

569 ms

loading.gif

loading.gif

567 ms

close.png

close.png

718 ms

Accessibility Review

tigerpak.co.uk accessibility score

86

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

tigerpak.co.uk best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

tigerpak.co.uk SEO score

83

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Tigerpak.co.uk can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Tigerpak.co.uk main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

tigerpak.co.uk

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Tigerpak. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: