3.2 sec in total
691 ms
2.3 sec
203 ms
Visit tigerprocess.com now to see the best up-to-date TIGER PROCESS content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about tigerprocess.com
Tiger Process spécialiste du matériel de soudage manuel et robotique en TIG et MIG. Intégration de cellule robotique.
Visit tigerprocess.comWe analyzed Tigerprocess.com page load time and found that the first response time was 691 ms and then it took 2.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.
tigerprocess.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value1.6 s
94/100
10%
Value2.1 s
96/100
25%
Value1.6 s
100/100
10%
Value0 ms
100/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value1.6 s
100/100
10%
691 ms
215 ms
191 ms
378 ms
269 ms
Our browser made a total of 38 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 95% of them (36 requests) were addressed to the original Tigerprocess.com, 5% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (910 ms) belongs to the original domain Tigerprocess.com.
Page size can be reduced by 546.1 kB (51%)
1.1 MB
531.9 kB
In fact, the total size of Tigerprocess.com main page is 1.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 30% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 570.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 40.4 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 40.4 kB or 84% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 42.7 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, TIGER PROCESS needs image optimization as it can save up to 42.7 kB or 11% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 390.9 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 390.9 kB or 69% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 72.0 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Tigerprocess.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 72.0 kB or 86% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 14 (38%)
37
23
The browser has sent 37 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of TIGER PROCESS. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 9 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 7 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
tigerprocess.com
691 ms
jcemediabox.css
215 ms
style.css
191 ms
mootools-core.js
378 ms
core.js
269 ms
caption.js
372 ms
mootools-more.js
465 ms
jcemediabox.js
402 ms
system.css
254 ms
general.css
312 ms
template.css
370 ms
template.responsive.css
456 ms
jquery.js
596 ms
script.js
457 ms
script.responsive.js
458 ms
system.css
102 ms
analytics.js
71 ms
popup.html
98 ms
tooltip.html
93 ms
object1075667918.png
110 ms
header.png
104 ms
menuseparator.png
102 ms
spacer.gif
109 ms
telephone.png
177 ms
logo_mail2.png
208 ms
tmp5C90.png
201 ms
tmp51E7.png
202 ms
shadow-1-left.png
218 ms
shadow-1-right.png
287 ms
1.jpg
512 ms
2.jpg
910 ms
4.jpg
549 ms
3.jpg
466 ms
footerbullets.png
343 ms
facebook.png
631 ms
Youtube_bouton.png
723 ms
twitter_bouton.png
563 ms
collect
13 ms
tigerprocess.com accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
tigerprocess.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
tigerprocess.com SEO score
FR
FR
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Tigerprocess.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that French is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Tigerprocess.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
tigerprocess.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of TIGER PROCESS. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: