Tools & Wizards About Us
tigersheet.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 32

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    52% of other websites

  • 97

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 92% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 96

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    90% of websites

tigersheet.com

TigerSheet - No Code CRM Platforms - Spreadsheet Alternative

Page Load Speed

1.5 sec in total

First Response

92 ms

Resources Loaded

1.1 sec

Page Rendered

227 ms

tigersheet.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to tigersheet.com homepage info - get ready to check Tiger Sheet best content for India right away, or after learning these important things about tigersheet.com

Use TigerSheet, a powerful Airtable alternative and Spreadsheet based no code platform to track and automate your business. Create your Free account today!

Visit tigersheet.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Tigersheet.com page load time and found that the first response time was 92 ms and then it took 1.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 30% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

tigersheet.com performance score

32

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.9 s

11/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value12.9 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value8.8 s

15/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value600 ms

49/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.058

98/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value18.8 s

3/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

tigersheet.com

92 ms

tigersheet.com

582 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

24 ms

bootstrap.min.css

23 ms

style.css

49 ms

Our browser made a total of 61 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 93% of them (57 requests) were addressed to the original Tigersheet.com, 2% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com and 2% (1 request) were made to Code.jquery.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (582 ms) belongs to the original domain Tigersheet.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 112.2 kB (20%)

Content Size

573.4 kB

After Optimization

461.2 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Tigersheet.com main page is 573.4 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 222.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-81%

Potential reduce by 69.5 kB

  • Original 85.6 kB
  • After minification 81.3 kB
  • After compression 16.2 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 69.5 kB or 81% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-11%

Potential reduce by 23.9 kB

  • Original 222.3 kB
  • After minification 198.5 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Tiger Sheet needs image optimization as it can save up to 23.9 kB or 11% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-6%

Potential reduce by 8.6 kB

  • Original 134.6 kB
  • After minification 134.6 kB
  • After compression 125.9 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-8%

Potential reduce by 10.2 kB

  • Original 130.8 kB
  • After minification 130.5 kB
  • After compression 120.6 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Tigersheet.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 42 (78%)

Requests Now

54

After Optimization

12

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 54 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Tiger Sheet. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 31 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 13 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

tigersheet.com

tigersheet.com

92 ms

tigersheet.com

tigersheet.com

582 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

wp-emoji-release.min.js

24 ms

bootstrap.min.css

bootstrap.min.css

23 ms

style.css

style.css

49 ms

style.css

style.css

44 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

44 ms

styles.css

styles.css

47 ms

kd_vc_front.css

kd_vc_front.css

82 ms

general.css

general.css

64 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

64 ms

js_composer.min.css

js_composer.min.css

88 ms

woocommerce.css

woocommerce.css

57 ms

photoswipe.css

photoswipe.css

62 ms

photoswipe-default-skin.css

photoswipe-default-skin.css

144 ms

css

css

158 ms

jquery.js

jquery.js

171 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

146 ms

jquery.easing.min.js

jquery.easing.min.js

146 ms

owl.carousel.min.js

owl.carousel.min.js

153 ms

jquery.easytabs.min.js

jquery.easytabs.min.js

167 ms

jquery.appear.js

jquery.appear.js

147 ms

kd_addon_script.js

kd_addon_script.js

146 ms

jquery.blockUI.min.js

jquery.blockUI.min.js

149 ms

add-to-cart.min.js

add-to-cart.min.js

148 ms

woocommerce-add-to-cart.js

woocommerce-add-to-cart.js

149 ms

woocommerce-keydesign.js

woocommerce-keydesign.js

150 ms

photoswipe.min.js

photoswipe.min.js

150 ms

photoswipe-ui-default.min.js

photoswipe-ui-default.min.js

151 ms

signup.js

signup.js

150 ms

login.js

login.js

153 ms

global.js

global.js

152 ms

jquery-3.3.1.min.js

jquery-3.3.1.min.js

150 ms

scripts.js

scripts.js

152 ms

main.js

main.js

163 ms

js.cookie.min.js

js.cookie.min.js

162 ms

woocommerce.min.js

woocommerce.min.js

150 ms

cart-fragments.min.js

cart-fragments.min.js

162 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

162 ms

imagesloaded.min.js

imagesloaded.min.js

162 ms

masonry.min.js

masonry.min.js

158 ms

SmoothScroll.js

SmoothScroll.js

204 ms

scripts.js

scripts.js

133 ms

wp-embed.min.js

wp-embed.min.js

131 ms

js_composer_front.min.js

js_composer_front.min.js

180 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

211 ms

background_img.png

background_img.png

89 ms

TigerSheet-gradient-main-files-02-2.png

TigerSheet-gradient-main-files-02-2.png

88 ms

pc2-586x437.png

pc2-586x437.png

98 ms

line_chart.png

line_chart.png

90 ms

dollar_symbol-50x50.png

dollar_symbol-50x50.png

90 ms

text_document-50x50.png

text_document-50x50.png

91 ms

laptop-50x50.png

laptop-50x50.png

99 ms

white_tiger_logo.png

white_tiger_logo.png

97 ms

or.png

or.png

98 ms

SF-Pro-Display-Medium.otf

SF-Pro-Display-Medium.otf

100 ms

font

font

95 ms

SF-Pro-Display-Bold.otf

SF-Pro-Display-Bold.otf

98 ms

SF-Pro-Display-Heavy.otf

SF-Pro-Display-Heavy.otf

99 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

96 ms

SF-Pro-Display-Regular.otf

SF-Pro-Display-Regular.otf

95 ms

Accessibility Review

tigersheet.com accessibility score

97

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Best Practices

tigersheet.com best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

tigersheet.com SEO score

96

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Tigersheet.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Tigersheet.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

tigersheet.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Tiger Sheet. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: