Tools & Wizards About Us
tigerstamping.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 20

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    37% of other websites

  • 96

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 88% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 93

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    83% of websites

tigerstamping.com

Metal Stamping & Metal Manufacturing | Tool & Die | Tiger Stamping

Page Load Speed

2.3 sec in total

First Response

79 ms

Resources Loaded

1.8 sec

Page Rendered

376 ms

tigerstamping.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to tigerstamping.com homepage info - get ready to check Tiger Stamping best content right away, or after learning these important things about tigerstamping.com

Tiger Stamping provides custom quality Metal Stamping & precise Tool & Die Manufacturing along with Custom Assembly engineered to meet client specifications.

Visit tigerstamping.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Tigerstamping.com page load time and found that the first response time was 79 ms and then it took 2.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

tigerstamping.com performance score

20

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.7 s

13/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value8.3 s

2/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value10.1 s

9/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value600 ms

50/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.879

3/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value11.8 s

17/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

tigerstamping.com

79 ms

www.tigerstamping.com

220 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

26 ms

style.min.css

68 ms

styles.css

85 ms

Our browser made a total of 75 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 79% of them (59 requests) were addressed to the original Tigerstamping.com, 7% (5 requests) were made to Gstatic.com and 5% (4 requests) were made to Google.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (355 ms) belongs to the original domain Tigerstamping.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 94.4 kB (11%)

Content Size

836.8 kB

After Optimization

742.4 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Tigerstamping.com main page is 836.8 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 346.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-79%

Potential reduce by 52.5 kB

  • Original 66.4 kB
  • After minification 65.0 kB
  • After compression 13.9 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 52.5 kB or 79% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 346.8 kB
  • After minification 346.8 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Tiger Stamping images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-7%

Potential reduce by 23.3 kB

  • Original 343.0 kB
  • After minification 343.0 kB
  • After compression 319.7 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-23%

Potential reduce by 18.6 kB

  • Original 80.6 kB
  • After minification 80.6 kB
  • After compression 62.0 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Tigerstamping.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 18.6 kB or 23% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 48 (76%)

Requests Now

63

After Optimization

15

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 63 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Tiger Stamping. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 29 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 21 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

tigerstamping.com

tigerstamping.com

79 ms

www.tigerstamping.com

www.tigerstamping.com

220 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

wp-emoji-release.min.js

26 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

68 ms

styles.css

styles.css

85 ms

front-flex.min.css

front-flex.min.css

87 ms

style.css

style.css

87 ms

sow-button-flat-83334171eda9.css

sow-button-flat-83334171eda9.css

88 ms

sow-button-wire-e0288dac2e58-5.css

sow-button-wire-e0288dac2e58-5.css

87 ms

sow-button-wire-de90956d40b7-5.css

sow-button-wire-de90956d40b7-5.css

88 ms

sow-button-flat-e64abad4944a-5.css

sow-button-flat-e64abad4944a-5.css

105 ms

sow-image-default-17bc2272b535-5.css

sow-image-default-17bc2272b535-5.css

106 ms

slider.css

slider.css

110 ms

sow-hero-default-d4dd07b6fa7f-5.css

sow-hero-default-d4dd07b6fa7f-5.css

108 ms

jquery.background-video.css

jquery.background-video.css

107 ms

so_video_background.css

so_video_background.css

107 ms

wpcf7-redirect-frontend.min.css

wpcf7-redirect-frontend.min.css

124 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

138 ms

style.css

style.css

166 ms

responsive.min.css

responsive.min.css

131 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

165 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

136 ms

jquery.cycle.min.js

jquery.cycle.min.js

146 ms

jquery.slider.min.js

jquery.slider.min.js

151 ms

sow-button-wire-78e7920868ac-5.css

sow-button-wire-78e7920868ac-5.css

154 ms

sow-hero-default-61cd5f48f49f-5.css

sow-hero-default-61cd5f48f49f-5.css

154 ms

sow-button-flat-d510a1675385.css

sow-button-flat-d510a1675385.css

198 ms

regenerator-runtime.min.js

regenerator-runtime.min.js

200 ms

wp-polyfill.min.js

wp-polyfill.min.js

201 ms

index.js

index.js

205 ms

jquery.background-video.js

jquery.background-video.js

207 ms

wpcf7-redirect-frontend-script.js

wpcf7-redirect-frontend-script.js

207 ms

jquery.sticky.min.js

jquery.sticky.min.js

210 ms

jquery.nav.min.js

jquery.nav.min.js

210 ms

flash.min.js

flash.min.js

273 ms

navigation.min.js

navigation.min.js

275 ms

skip-link-focus-fix.js

skip-link-focus-fix.js

274 ms

api.js

api.js

36 ms

waypoints.min.js

waypoints.min.js

274 ms

jquery.counterup.min.js

jquery.counterup.min.js

256 ms

index.js

index.js

214 ms

wp-embed.min.js

wp-embed.min.js

225 ms

styling.min.js

styling.min.js

223 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

194 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

104 ms

tiger-stripes-min.png

tiger-stripes-min.png

108 ms

logo-small.png

logo-small.png

109 ms

shot-show-logo-main-min.png

shot-show-logo-main-min.png

109 ms

capabilities2-min-300x225.jpg

capabilities2-min-300x225.jpg

109 ms

capabilities_ARparts-min-300x225.jpg

capabilities_ARparts-min-300x225.jpg

181 ms

service-tool-die-min-300x225.jpg

service-tool-die-min-300x225.jpg

180 ms

original_packaging-min-300x225.jpg

original_packaging-min-300x225.jpg

181 ms

original_prototypes-min-300x225.jpg

original_prototypes-min-300x225.jpg

182 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Hw5aXx-p7K4GLs.woff

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Hw5aXx-p7K4GLs.woff

106 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Hw3aXx-p7K4GLvztg.woff

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Hw3aXx-p7K4GLvztg.woff

355 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Hw2aXx-p7K4GLvztg.woff

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Hw2aXx-p7K4GLvztg.woff

105 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Hw9aXx-p7K4GLvztg.woff

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Hw9aXx-p7K4GLvztg.woff

105 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Hw0aXx-p7K4GLvztg.woff

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Hw0aXx-p7K4GLvztg.woff

105 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

227 ms

recaptcha__en.js

recaptcha__en.js

97 ms

collect

collect

14 ms

js

js

185 ms

animals-2358703-hdr-min.jpg

animals-2358703-hdr-min.jpg

125 ms

tigerstamping22-min.jpg

tigerstamping22-min.jpg

126 ms

anchor

anchor

53 ms

slider.woff

slider.woff

33 ms

styles__ltr.css

styles__ltr.css

14 ms

recaptcha__en.js

recaptcha__en.js

17 ms

w8jilI7vDbJvAiJQQk88k7rduamqHzPsdFolUJZhiKw.js

w8jilI7vDbJvAiJQQk88k7rduamqHzPsdFolUJZhiKw.js

46 ms

webworker.js

webworker.js

45 ms

logo_48.png

logo_48.png

33 ms

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf

43 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9.ttf

45 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmYUtfBBc9.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmYUtfBBc9.ttf

47 ms

recaptcha__en.js

recaptcha__en.js

37 ms

Accessibility Review

tigerstamping.com accessibility score

96

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best Practices

tigerstamping.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

tigerstamping.com SEO score

93

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Tigerstamping.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Tigerstamping.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

tigerstamping.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Tiger Stamping. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: