Report Summary

  • 34

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    54% of other websites

  • 87

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 66% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 98

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    92% of websites

tikal.de

E-Commerce Agentur aus Hamburg | TIKAL Communication

Page Load Speed

9.8 sec in total

First Response

356 ms

Resources Loaded

9 sec

Page Rendered

443 ms

tikal.de screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing TIKAL content for Germany. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about tikal.de

TIKAL ist die strategische E-Commerce Agentur mit Full-Service Ansatz und Sitz im Herzen von Hamburg. Bei uns finden Sie konkrete Leistungen und Preise!

Visit tikal.de

Key Findings

We analyzed Tikal.de page load time and found that the first response time was 356 ms and then it took 9.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 90% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

tikal.de performance score

34

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.7 s

12/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value8.3 s

2/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value7.9 s

23/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value710 ms

41/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.029

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value9.7 s

29/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

tikal.de

356 ms

www.tikal.de

2730 ms

css

61 ms

frontend.css

96 ms

woocommerce-mod.css

191 ms

Our browser made a total of 126 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 77% of them (97 requests) were addressed to the original Tikal.de, 10% (12 requests) were made to Provenexpert.com and 6% (7 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.7 sec) belongs to the original domain Tikal.de.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 973.4 kB (39%)

Content Size

2.5 MB

After Optimization

1.5 MB

In fact, the total size of Tikal.de main page is 2.5 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.2 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-86%

Potential reduce by 121.7 kB

  • Original 141.7 kB
  • After minification 139.3 kB
  • After compression 20.0 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 121.7 kB or 86% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 7.2 kB

  • Original 1.2 MB
  • After minification 1.2 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. TIKAL images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-59%

Potential reduce by 295.6 kB

  • Original 499.4 kB
  • After minification 492.9 kB
  • After compression 203.8 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 295.6 kB or 59% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-85%

Potential reduce by 548.9 kB

  • Original 644.7 kB
  • After minification 546.1 kB
  • After compression 95.8 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Tikal.de needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 548.9 kB or 85% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 53 (49%)

Requests Now

108

After Optimization

55

The browser has sent 108 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of TIKAL. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 32 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 23 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

tikal.de accessibility score

87

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

tikal.de best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

tikal.de SEO score

98

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    DE

  • Language Claimed

    DE

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Tikal.de can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that German is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Tikal.de main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of TIKAL. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: