Tools & Wizards About Us
tileremoval.net screenshot

Report Summary

  • 28

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    47% of other websites

  • 92

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 79% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 83

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    46% of websites

tileremoval.net

Dust Free Ceramic Floor Tile Removal Tools and Companies

Page Load Speed

4.6 sec in total

First Response

46 ms

Resources Loaded

3.8 sec

Page Rendered

662 ms

tileremoval.net screenshot

About Website

Visit tileremoval.net now to see the best up-to-date Tile Removal content for India and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about tileremoval.net

Removing tile is no easy task. Without dustless system tools, you're at risk no matter if removing saltillo, travertine, bathroom or ceramic.

Visit tileremoval.net

Key Findings

We analyzed Tileremoval.net page load time and found that the first response time was 46 ms and then it took 4.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

tileremoval.net performance score

28

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.7 s

61/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value12.0 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value15.0 s

1/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,040 ms

25/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.102

89/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value16.8 s

5/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

tileremoval.net

46 ms

tileremoval.net

2516 ms

style.min.css

147 ms

font-awesome-legacy.min.css

67 ms

grid-system.css

53 ms

Our browser made a total of 85 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 66% of them (56 requests) were addressed to the original Tileremoval.net, 18% (15 requests) were made to Fast.wistia.com and 8% (7 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.5 sec) belongs to the original domain Tileremoval.net.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 399.5 kB (10%)

Content Size

4.0 MB

After Optimization

3.6 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Tileremoval.net main page is 4.0 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 3.0 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-81%

Potential reduce by 108.8 kB

  • Original 134.9 kB
  • After minification 132.9 kB
  • After compression 26.1 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 108.8 kB or 81% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 65.4 kB

  • Original 3.0 MB
  • After minification 2.9 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Tile Removal images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-21%

Potential reduce by 146.2 kB

  • Original 690.6 kB
  • After minification 690.6 kB
  • After compression 544.4 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 146.2 kB or 21% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-37%

Potential reduce by 79.1 kB

  • Original 214.8 kB
  • After minification 207.0 kB
  • After compression 135.7 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Tileremoval.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 79.1 kB or 37% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 56 (76%)

Requests Now

74

After Optimization

18

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 74 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Tile Removal. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 34 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 24 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

tileremoval.net

tileremoval.net

46 ms

tileremoval.net

tileremoval.net

2516 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

147 ms

font-awesome-legacy.min.css

font-awesome-legacy.min.css

67 ms

grid-system.css

grid-system.css

53 ms

style.css

style.css

59 ms

header-secondary-nav.css

header-secondary-nav.css

54 ms

element-fancy-unordered-list.css

element-fancy-unordered-list.css

131 ms

element-milestone.css

element-milestone.css

173 ms

element-icon-with-text.css

element-icon-with-text.css

171 ms

wpforms.css

wpforms.css

181 ms

css

css

46 ms

responsive.css

responsive.css

183 ms

skin-material.css

skin-material.css

250 ms

menu-dynamic.css

menu-dynamic.css

183 ms

js_composer.min.css

js_composer.min.css

290 ms

salient-dynamic-styles.css

salient-dynamic-styles.css

316 ms

style.css

style.css

220 ms

css

css

66 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

328 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

222 ms

js

js

71 ms

eipjuf9724.jsonp

eipjuf9724.jsonp

28 ms

E-v1.js

E-v1.js

33 ms

36eky0vuu9.jsonp

36eky0vuu9.jsonp

33 ms

566g3cushf.jsonp

566g3cushf.jsonp

34 ms

yfja3gobxo.jsonp

yfja3gobxo.jsonp

34 ms

animate.min.css

animate.min.css

261 ms

style-non-critical.css

style-non-critical.css

261 ms

jquery.fancybox.css

jquery.fancybox.css

288 ms

core.css

core.css

418 ms

slide-out-right-material.css

slide-out-right-material.css

418 ms

slide-out-right-hover.css

slide-out-right-hover.css

369 ms

wpforms-full.min.css

wpforms-full.min.css

368 ms

jquery.easing.min.js

jquery.easing.min.js

481 ms

jquery.mousewheel.min.js

jquery.mousewheel.min.js

480 ms

priority.js

priority.js

416 ms

transit.min.js

transit.min.js

416 ms

waypoints.js

waypoints.js

418 ms

imagesLoaded.min.js

imagesLoaded.min.js

469 ms

hoverintent.min.js

hoverintent.min.js

469 ms

jquery.fancybox.js

jquery.fancybox.js

578 ms

anime.min.js

anime.min.js

517 ms

stickkit.js

stickkit.js

478 ms

superfish.js

superfish.js

478 ms

init.js

init.js

617 ms

touchswipe.min.js

touchswipe.min.js

573 ms

js_composer_front.min.js

js_composer_front.min.js

471 ms

jquery.validate.min.js

jquery.validate.min.js

560 ms

mailcheck.min.js

mailcheck.min.js

555 ms

punycode.min.js

punycode.min.js

492 ms

utils.min.js

utils.min.js

475 ms

wpforms.min.js

wpforms.min.js

582 ms

wpforms-modern.min.js

wpforms-modern.min.js

495 ms

swatch

swatch

32 ms

dustram-logo.jpeg

dustram-logo.jpeg

407 ms

kitchen-subfloor.jpg

kitchen-subfloor.jpg

408 ms

dustless-tile-removal-1.jpg

dustless-tile-removal-1.jpg

406 ms

submit-spin.svg

submit-spin.svg

322 ms

swatch

swatch

30 ms

swatch

swatch

30 ms

swatch

swatch

29 ms

dustram-dust-free-tile-floor-removal-1024x830-1.png

dustram-dust-free-tile-floor-removal-1024x830-1.png

475 ms

1095036_110.jpg

1095036_110.jpg

475 ms

kitchen-tile-floor-removal-and-thinset.png

kitchen-tile-floor-removal-and-thinset.png

661 ms

pxiEyp8kv8JHgFVrJJfedA.woff

pxiEyp8kv8JHgFVrJJfedA.woff

62 ms

TK3_WkUHHAIjg75cFRf3bXL8LICs1y9osUZiYw.woff

TK3_WkUHHAIjg75cFRf3bXL8LICs1y9osUZiYw.woff

98 ms

TK3_WkUHHAIjg75cFRf3bXL8LICs18NvsUZiYw.woff

TK3_WkUHHAIjg75cFRf3bXL8LICs18NvsUZiYw.woff

97 ms

icomoon.woff

icomoon.woff

432 ms

fontawesome-webfont.svg

fontawesome-webfont.svg

340 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1x4uaVQ.woff

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1x4uaVQ.woff

89 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4uaVQ.woff

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4uaVQ.woff

53 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4uaVQ.woff

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4uaVQ.woff

91 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0B4uaVQ.woff

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0B4uaVQ.woff

92 ms

wistia-mux.js

wistia-mux.js

43 ms

externalPlayer.js

externalPlayer.js

54 ms

customerLogo.js

customerLogo.js

29 ms

share-v2.js

share-v2.js

84 ms

postRoll-v2.js

postRoll-v2.js

81 ms

midrollLink-v2.js

midrollLink-v2.js

79 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

233 ms

65c0c13fda2dcad12a1a36efbf1b1433966057de.jpg

65c0c13fda2dcad12a1a36efbf1b1433966057de.jpg

234 ms

c992273035b36dcfcac2389fbb79ce25.jpg

c992273035b36dcfcac2389fbb79ce25.jpg

182 ms

6139ea5a80dad6b85b2906faeaf784cb.jpg

6139ea5a80dad6b85b2906faeaf784cb.jpg

89 ms

c691bbff46167f1cb6057d4b643dd57d.jpg

c691bbff46167f1cb6057d4b643dd57d.jpg

207 ms

Accessibility Review

tileremoval.net accessibility score

92

Accessibility Issues

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

tileremoval.net best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

tileremoval.net SEO score

83

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Tileremoval.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Tileremoval.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

tileremoval.net

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Tile Removal. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: