Tools & Wizards About Us
tilesview.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 17

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    32% of other websites

  • 88

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 68% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 86

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    60% of websites

tilesview.com

Best 3D Tile Visualizer for Wall and Floor - Tile Visualizer Software & App | Tiles View

Page Load Speed

5 sec in total

First Response

385 ms

Resources Loaded

3.7 sec

Page Rendered

937 ms

tilesview.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to tilesview.com homepage info - get ready to check Tiles View best content for India right away, or after learning these important things about tilesview.com

Elevate your design dreams with our online 3D tiles visualizer. Perfect for every room, kitchen, bathroom, and beyond. Plus, explore the power of our paint visualizer and rug visualizer - your ultimat...

Visit tilesview.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Tilesview.com page load time and found that the first response time was 385 ms and then it took 4.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

tilesview.com performance score

17

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.4 s

37/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value9.9 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value13.9 s

1/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value3,220 ms

2/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.146

77/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value15.9 s

6/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

tilesview.com

385 ms

tilesview.ai

1507 ms

uicons-regular-rounded.css

43 ms

block-library.style.css

32 ms

bootstrap.5.3.0.min.css

812 ms

Our browser made a total of 71 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 1% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Tilesview.com, 82% (58 requests) were made to Tilesview.ai and 7% (5 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.5 sec) relates to the external source Tilesview.ai.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 107.9 kB (39%)

Content Size

276.5 kB

After Optimization

168.6 kB

  • HTML
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Tilesview.com main page is 276.5 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. CSS take 101.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 78.6 kB

  • Original 94.4 kB
  • After minification 94.4 kB
  • After compression 15.8 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 78.6 kB or 83% of the original size.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 126 B

  • Original 81.0 kB
  • After minification 81.0 kB
  • After compression 80.9 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-29%

Potential reduce by 29.2 kB

  • Original 101.0 kB
  • After minification 74.6 kB
  • After compression 71.8 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Tilesview.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 29.2 kB or 29% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 22 (37%)

Requests Now

59

After Optimization

37

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 59 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Tiles View. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 13 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 11 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

tilesview.com

tilesview.com

385 ms

tilesview.ai

tilesview.ai

1507 ms

uicons-regular-rounded.css

uicons-regular-rounded.css

43 ms

block-library.style.css

block-library.style.css

32 ms

bootstrap.5.3.0.min.css

bootstrap.5.3.0.min.css

812 ms

slick.min.css

slick.min.css

56 ms

slick-theme.min.css

slick-theme.min.css

55 ms

document360-min5448.css

document360-min5448.css

49 ms

all.min.css

all.min.css

56 ms

tvcustom.css

tvcustom.css

35 ms

js

js

81 ms

js

js

118 ms

js

js

155 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

34 ms

popper.min.js

popper.min.js

78 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

54 ms

lazysizes.min6dbf.js

lazysizes.min6dbf.js

59 ms

document360-min5448.js

document360-min5448.js

59 ms

doc360ref.min5448.js

doc360ref.min5448.js

72 ms

slick.min.js

slick.min.js

62 ms

tvcustom.js

tvcustom.js

76 ms

fbevents.js

fbevents.js

130 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

128 ms

menu_arrow_down.svg

menu_arrow_down.svg

115 ms

bg5.webp

bg5.webp

164 ms

50x50-loader.gif

50x50-loader.gif

116 ms

1.webp

1.webp

113 ms

2.webp

2.webp

112 ms

3.webp

3.webp

114 ms

4.webp

4.webp

117 ms

5.webp

5.webp

161 ms

6.webp

6.webp

117 ms

7.webp

7.webp

162 ms

8.webp

8.webp

161 ms

9.webp

9.webp

162 ms

10.webp

10.webp

160 ms

11.webp

11.webp

168 ms

12.webp

12.webp

164 ms

13.webp

13.webp

164 ms

14.webp

14.webp

165 ms

15.webp

15.webp

168 ms

16.webp

16.webp

166 ms

17.webp

17.webp

166 ms

18.webp

18.webp

168 ms

19.webp

19.webp

169 ms

20.webp

20.webp

168 ms

shape-1.svg

shape-1.svg

184 ms

bg1.svg

bg1.svg

186 ms

manufacturing1.webp

manufacturing1.webp

187 ms

supply-chain.webp

supply-chain.webp

196 ms

offline-retailer.webp

offline-retailer.webp

187 ms

e-commerce.webp

e-commerce.webp

187 ms

arrow01.svg

arrow01.svg

737 ms

Tilesview-White.svg

Tilesview-White.svg

193 ms

normal.woff2

normal.woff2

127 ms

normal.woff2

normal.woff2

137 ms

normal.woff2

normal.woff2

227 ms

normal.woff2

normal.woff2

237 ms

normal.woff2

normal.woff2

143 ms

fa-brands-400.ttf

fa-brands-400.ttf

89 ms

uicons-regular-rounded.woff

uicons-regular-rounded.woff

859 ms

api.ipify.org

api.ipify.org

80 ms

normal.woff2

normal.woff2

103 ms

normal.woff2

normal.woff2

129 ms

normal.woff2

normal.woff2

121 ms

ns.html

ns.html

44 ms

star3.svg

star3.svg

611 ms

star4.svg

star4.svg

67 ms

bootstrap.5.3.0.min.css

bootstrap.5.3.0.min.css

24 ms

slick.min.css

slick.min.css

24 ms

slick-theme.min.css

slick-theme.min.css

16 ms

Accessibility Review

tilesview.com accessibility score

88

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

ARIA IDs are not unique

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).

Best Practices

tilesview.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

tilesview.com SEO score

86

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Document doesn't have a valid hreflang

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Tilesview.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Tilesview.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

tilesview.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Tiles View. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: